When Should Cops Be Allowed To Take Control of Self-Driving Cars?

Truth200

Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
16,449
Reputation
2,589
Daps
32,394
The License Plate Surveillance Technology That Caught the Virginia Shooter

In a press conference Wednesday afternoon, Sheriff Bill Overton divulged that state police were able to find Vester Lee Flanagan when his rental car’s license plate number was picked up by a trooper’s license plate reader. Flanagan, who was wanted for the murder of a TV reporter and a cameraman shot while doing a live report, fled when police tried to pull him over and ultimately shot himself.

Automatic license plate readers are a little-known surveillance technology used by law enforcement to track America’s motorists.

You may not be able to describe a license plate reader, but you’ve likely seen them. They aren’t hiding; the gadget can be mounted on anything from bridges and overpasses to road signs and police cars. The readers are equipped with high-speed cameras to take pictures of thousands of license plates per minute and software to analyze the pictures for a license plate number. That information is checked against “hot lists,” including stolen vehicles or those subject to an Amber alert search, and law enforcement is notified if there is a match. The image and identified plate number, along with date, time and location, are sent to various regional law enforcement databases.

Try Newsweek for only $1.25 per week

In 2012, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Department of Homeland Security was pushing license plate readers, distributing $50 million in federal grants to law enforcement agencies over the preceding five years to purchase the technology. A 2011 survey found that almost three-quarters of police agencies polled used license plate readers, while 85 percent planned to increase their use over the next five years. Documents obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union through the Freedom of Information Act suggest that they’ve since proliferated.

As the Flanagan case proves, there are legitimate law enforcement purposes for such technology, like alerting police to a criminal’s location. But license plate readers have also come under fire in recent years by civil liberties advocates who say millions of innocent drivers have had their travels and activities tracked in the process. The ACLU adds that “a lack of regulation means that policies governing how long our location data is kept vary widely.” As of July 2013, the ACLU says Brookline, Massachusetts, police department retains drivers’ information for 14 days, while Jersey City, New Jersey, deletes data after five years.

Plate images, collected over time, can provide stunning detail of people’s lives. In 2012, the Journal reported that a man from San Leandro, California, named Michael Katz-Lacabe filed a public records request for copies of photographs taken by his local police department’s license plate scanners. He was handed more than 100 pictures of his car in various locations. One showed his daughters exiting his car, which was parked in their driveway.

But San Leandro Police Chief Sandra Spagnoli contends that the benefits outweigh the privacy concerns, telling the Journal that “it's irresponsible if you have something that could solve a crime in the future, and you've dumped it."


http://www.newsweek.com/license-plate-surveillance-technology-caught-virginia-shooter-366042
 

kevm3

follower of Jesus
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,321
Reputation
5,605
Daps
83,692
Not long until self driving cars with a camera with facial recognition technology on the dashboard required to start the car... being billed as a security feature to prevent thieves, but really attaching a face to a location, where every route is tracked via gps and sent to a database and if you're wanted, the car will lock you in and drive you to the station on it's own. Before that we'll need a huge media campaign of 'experts' of various sorts telling us how safe this technology is and how it's safer than driving your own car and how manual drivers are dangers to the rest of the population and should be shamed... and couple that with an influx of celebrities showing how 'cool' their self-driving car is.
 

Red Shield

Global Domination
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
21,579
Reputation
2,566
Daps
47,913
Reppin
.0001%
Not long until self driving cars with a camera with facial recognition technology on the dashboard required to start the car... being billed as a security feature to prevent thieves, but really attaching a face to a location, where every route is tracked via gps and sent to a database and if you're wanted, the car will lock you in and drive you to the station on it's own. Before that we'll need a huge media campaign of 'experts' of various sorts telling us how safe this technology is and how it's safer than driving your own car and how manual drivers are dangers to the rest of the population and should be shamed... and couple that with an influx of celebrities showing how 'cool' their self-driving car is.

shyt I wasn't even thinking about all of that. Wouldn't even take the media long to swing public opinion :merchant:


The potential nightmare totalitarian future of this country :banderas:
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,343
Daps
116,003
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
Not long until self driving cars with a camera with facial recognition technology on the dashboard required to start the car... being billed as a security feature to prevent thieves, but really attaching a face to a location, where every route is tracked via gps and sent to a database and if you're wanted, the car will lock you in and drive you to the station on it's own. Before that we'll need a huge media campaign of 'experts' of various sorts telling us how safe this technology is and how it's safer than driving your own car and how manual drivers are dangers to the rest of the population and should be shamed... and couple that with an influx of celebrities showing how 'cool' their self-driving car is.

Pretty much. Kind of like that Lupe video, put a pretty woman, a famous guy or any celebrity next to an "object" they give it that "cool" and "I as a common man want that" factor........

Matter fact there is a movie either in production or being discussed about a race across Europe, through Russia, to China about self driving cars. So this big budget cinematic production will be "the go to movie about self driving cars" giving it that pop culture "acceptance" Gore Verbinski is Making a Driverless Car Comedy

"Gore Verbinski, director of "Pirates of the Caribbean," and Steve Conrad, writer of "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty," are teaming up for a new movie about a driverless car race from Europe to China, according to Deadline.

In the untitled pitch, software companies are tasked with creating the driverless car of the future. But it turns into a competition and then a race, and passengers stuck inside the cars must figure out how to take control as the cars begin to go off-road and off-the-grid. The film is being written as an action-comedy.


"The driverless car is coming, It's right around the bend, and it represents an immediate and relevant opportunity to explore the classic 'Man against Machine' genre spliced into a large scale Automotive Rally. Stating the obvious – Things are going to get out of control," Verbinski hyperbolically told Deadline."

So when you see Beyonce singing in a driverless car, in a song called "No Driver" you already know :sas2:.
 
Last edited:
Top