When will the left throw min wage in the bushes, and focus on collective bargaining and stronger safety nets?

The numbers speak for themselves.

It's not mutually exclusive. But an increased minimum wage seems more tenable and probable right now than strengthening unions and collective bargaining. What you're ignoring however is that the arguments will be the same. The same businesses that are currently claiming they cannot afford to raise minimum and that it will cost jobs, will be required to do just that and provide superior benefits if unionization becomes the status quo. They make the same arguments right now when employees attempt to unionize. The arguments will frequently overlap.![]()
When will the left throw min wage in the bushes, and focus on collective bargaining and stronger safety nets?
The numbers speak for themselves.
More damaging as well according to the CBO report.It's not mutually exclusive. But an increased minimum wage seems more tenable and probable right now than strengthening unions and collective bargaining. What you're ignoring however is that the arguments will be the same. The same businesses that are currently claiming they cannot afford to raise minimum and that it will cost jobs, will be required to do just that and provide superior benefits if unionization becomes the status quo. They make the same arguments right now when employees attempt to unionize. The arguments will frequently overlap.


When you say focus on collective bargaining, do you mean where in the bushes to aim?
What do you mean by safety nets as well?
I don't particularly like raising minimum wage but that income is going to get subsidized somewhere...i rather the employer do it than the government.


what does america have, 300 million more ppl![]()
Could you expand on this? cause Im sure you know unemployment is measured in %...Could you expand on this? cause Im sure you know unemployment is measured in %...
there gets to a point where its harder to provide the same percentage for a larger amount of peoplethere gets to a point where its harder to provide the same percentage for a larger amount of people


Why do you guys engage with this poster? just neg until he understands
Except your missing one key detail, rich white people and their cac attitudes. The Walton family owns $100 billion estimated with Wal-Mart, and that store is utter shyt. With a bigger population, if there is not a minimum wage hike, legit peeps will use Medicaid and be a burden on taxpayers. By giving people $15 p/hr, you take them of social programs and be able to lower the tax bracket because the need for socialize programs goes down. Not to mention we have the huge jail infrastructure and military to support tax wise. Straight up America has financial diabetes, and we need insulin to keep it running properly.For a time, til inflation eats the wage and your looking at another wage increase.(I think we are on our 27th wage increase) Its not a solution nor a good band-aid IMHO.Except your missing one key detail, rich white people and their cac attitudes. The Walton family owns $100 billion estimated with Wal-Mart, and that store is utter shyt. With a bigger population, if there is not a minimum wage hike, legit peeps will use Medicaid and be a burden on taxpayers. By giving people $15 p/hr, you take them of social programs and be able to lower the tax bracket because the need for socialize programs goes down. Not to mention we have the huge jail infrastructure and military to support tax wise. Straight up America has financial diabetes, and we need insulin to keep it running properly.
This cant be the kind of progress we are looking for?
