Which is worse to bump on: 1986-1998 WWF ring, or lucha rings

stro

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
10,491
Reputation
1,279
Daps
30,799
Reppin
Indiana
Simple as. WWF rings had absolutely zero give in that span. Lucha rings are so bad people would rather bump on the floor but somehow seem to have a hollowness to them at least. Dudes in the 40s and 50s bumping in boxing rings seem to have had it easier.
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

Drink wolf cola
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
32,980
Reputation
9,969
Daps
109,751
Reppin
Brooklyn
I’m going with the 90’s WCW ring. Hurricane Helms said that thing felt like concrete. Less give than even the 90’s WWF ring which is really saying something.
 

The Intergalactic Koala

Reporting for Duty
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2017
Messages
66,395
Reputation
25,927
Daps
271,344
Reppin
Koalabama and the Cosmos
WWE rings made Hoegan hip bone and buttmeat go "aoo you got me brother".

Theres a reason why half of the 80s are either senile or dead. You gotta be doped up to take those bumps on that canvas coffin :whoa:
 
Top