Which is worse to bump on: 1986-1998 WWF ring, or lucha rings

stro

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
10,620
Reputation
1,399
Daps
31,359
Reppin
Indiana
Simple as. WWF rings had absolutely zero give in that span. Lucha rings are so bad people would rather bump on the floor but somehow seem to have a hollowness to them at least. Dudes in the 40s and 50s bumping in boxing rings seem to have had it easier.
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

I’m here for the scraps
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
33,415
Reputation
10,019
Daps
110,792
Reppin
Brooklyn
I’m going with the 90’s WCW ring. Hurricane Helms said that thing felt like concrete. Less give than even the 90’s WWF ring which is really saying something.
 

The Intergalactic Koala

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2017
Messages
67,579
Reputation
27,052
Daps
276,724
Reppin
Extinct
WWE rings made Hoegan hip bone and buttmeat go "aoo you got me brother".

Theres a reason why half of the 80s are either senile or dead. You gotta be doped up to take those bumps on that canvas coffin :whoa:
 
Top