So the NRO is going to forget the realignment of parties in the 50s and 60s and their racist founder
par for the course
par for the course
par for the courseOn a side note didn't some just expose the national review for being a racist rag?
@tmonster perhaps
It's racist but the only paper that calls out the pc liberals, who are the black mans biggest enemy
There are so many lies on this article... I thought about giving a rebuttal but it's like shooting fish in a barrel.
The GOP is in defense mode right now, trying to disassociate themselves from the confederate flag-waving Bubbas who make up their base (while counting on their votes nonetheless).
She's basically saying "yeah, we defend that flag now but we're not racist... The racists died before the GOP took over the South"
I especially love how she conveniently dismissed Goldwater's vote against the 1964 CRA, his subsequent campaign on that vote and win in the deep South (while losing the rest of the country).
The funniest thing is how some conservatives claim that "Martin Luther King Jr was a republican". A man they hated when he was alive and called a "race-hustling communist"
Here's what MLK had to say when the GOP welcomed racist white southerners into their party in 1964 (by nominating Barry Goldwater for president three months after he voted against the Civil Rights Act):
The GOP share of the black vote dropped from 34 percent for Nixon in 1960 to just 4 percent for Goldwater in 1964. That's when they lost the black vote for good.
King voted for JFK and LBJ too. He was also murdered while organizing a UNION protest (we all know how much republicans love unions)....![]()

You are delusional if you think political correctness is your enemyIt's racist but the only paper that calls out the pc liberals, who are the black mans biggest enemy
You damn right.Nixon's Southern Strategy cemented the modern GOP as the party for the racists in 1964. It's been the playbook for winning Republican elections ever since, Sarah Palin drew hard from it when she was running with McCain.
The problem for them now is that the demographics have changed and the GOP (especially post-Obama) can't tell which white people will respond to the racially divisive dog-whistle speech and which won't, so it's not as effective. They still use it all the time though - adapting it for Mexicans, women, gay people, ect - because their only other election strategy seems to be gerrymandering districts. That's why 2016 is going to be so much fun to watch.![]()
On a side note didn't some just expose the national review for being a racist rag?
@tmonster perhaps
It's racist but the only paper that calls out the pc liberals, who are the black mans biggest enemy
too latehe's the worst debater on here, don't bring him into this...
its worse than @napolean somehow...the line between the knowledge he's kicking and what he thinks he's kicking is very thick.

In honor of the OG conservative @KingpinOG I will post this article here today to combat the liberal brigade.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/420321/democratic-party-racist-history-mona-charen
oh no you dzin-ant....national review....
...........................
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com...e-supremacy-the-national-review-will-be-there
![]()
![]()
Free daps
I got ole boy to jump out the closet![]()
I'm...bad? WTF?he's the worst debater on here, don't bring him into this...
its worse than @napolean somehow...the line between the knowledge he's kicking and what he thinks he's kicking is very thick.

In honor of the OG conservative @KingpinOG I will post this article here today to combat the liberal brigade.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/420321/democratic-party-racist-history-mona-charen