Who has more clout with women: athletes or actors?

Dave24

Superstar
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
17,887
Reputation
2,859
Daps
23,807
Musicians first, cuz women fall in love w/ the words/poetry. Especially if it speaks to them. You can touch a bytch soul.:manny:

Actors next, cuz females fall in love w/ a character, or a role, the person might've played. The funny thing about great actors is, they could be completely opposite, of a character/role they've played, IRL (geeky, uncharismatic, etc).:pachaha:

I'd put athletes last. Yea, they get the most exposure, but I'd argue women don't pick up on male athletes, until they blow. Thats by proxy of regular men/fans, who champion the athlete, or sport. Also, females like male athletes for their aesthetic. Their physique/build, height, etc. News flash...there's a lot of regular men on the street, with these same athletic attributes (tall, muscular, handsome, etc) who just aren't PRO athletes. They eat well IRL too.
Where would you rank famous pastors and famous politicians and how would you break them down? @DatNkkaCutty
 

Roid Jones

HVM Advocate
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
60,401
Reputation
8,798
Daps
181,101
2022 Posters

200.gif
 

Iverson_64

Superstar
Joined
May 31, 2022
Messages
3,299
Reputation
1,809
Daps
14,699
In schools or non-professional settings, athletes.

Overall, actors.

Actors and musicians just have more clout and a stronger female following. Someone like Michael B Jordan, Pete Davidson, Chris Hemsworth, Chris Evans, Denzel, Idris, etc. as well as men who star in shows that are popular with women will have more sway with the average broad because their names are everywhere and there's a lot of clout that comes with being associated with them.

With professional sports, women usually be faking the funk when it comes to fandom just to impress male fans and athletes who aren't big name celebrities like Lebron, Curry, Mahomes, Phelps, Woods, Jeter, etc. can go unnoticed by many crowds of women without the paparazzi or news reporters following them around.

In non-professional settings like schools, though, athletes usually have the upper hand because they have more clout and a bigger reputation than students in acting classes but not by a huge margin because a lot of dudes who pursue acting tend to either be look-obsessed/metrosexual or they have insane amounts of charisma and humor.
 

KidJSoul

Veteran
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Messages
20,179
Reputation
4,272
Daps
88,333
Athletes physically

But musicians overall, because they are usually more famous, while still usually looking attractive :dame: :yeshrug:
 

Jermio

Superstar
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
6,072
Reputation
-4,390
Daps
13,327
Reppin
NULL
As some have said, it depends on your tier within the profession. DiCaprio had bytches in every age category in nearly every country on Earth losing their minds over him circa Titanic; that's a different level of crazy than even women shrieking after 60s Mick Jagger or Paul McCartney or whatever. But it's usually tied to a movie, so it doesn't always have the same longevity as a really famous musician. John Mayer can pull bad bytches anywhere, and he hasn't had a real radio hit in a long time. I agree athletes have the highest floor though. Some 6'5" division 3 player who walks around like he's the man will have bytches more interested than some actual guitar/singing virtuoso at the same college.
 
Top