Who has worse WM main events Roman or HHH?

Who has the worse WM main event catalog?

  • Roman Reigns

    Votes: 24 70.6%
  • Triple H

    Votes: 10 29.4%

  • Total voters
    34

Stop_It_5

Veteran
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
14,947
Reputation
3,872
Daps
96,555
Won't pin this one on him or Brock, the abrupt finish at 11:45 was absolutely an injury audible.
 

XII

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
14,031
Reputation
5,530
Daps
64,245
6184f-16181986549740-800.jpg


Roman still up some of those HHH main events unwatchable today
 

BrehWyatt

Let me work.
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
21,488
Reputation
2,475
Daps
57,474
Reppin
#TSC
Hard to say. Most would assume HHH by default, but for a lot of Roman's matches, the crowd tended to check out and not pay attention because they assumed he'd win.

This happened at WM 32 and especially happened at WM 34 (I saw the latter in the Superdome and can firmly attest that the vast majority of those in attendance cannot legit speak on that match's quality or lack thereof because they were too busy playing with beach balls). Also, all of Roman's matches with Brock (which make up half of his main events) are the exact same match. The first time? That works. But when you KEEP doing it... meh.

HHH's early main events were better than credited (I feel like the WM 2000 and WM XX main events still hold up). However, his WM 19 match with Booker was egregiously bullshyt.
 

CBoz

We Are NXT!
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
62,192
Reputation
3,608
Daps
142,092
Reppin
The NXT Universe
I'm sorry but Reigns matches are just slogs. At least Trips had some good matches despite the overkill NWA caliber ass workrate. Reigns suffers from the typical spamfest and fukkery that takes away from the WM moment :francis:.
His matches with Brock are always like this. That's the problem. Just look at last year with who he was in with and it wasn't a slog. So hopefully Vince got the Reigns vs Lesnar feud out of his system. Crossing my fingers...
 

Jmare007

pico pal q lee
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,922
Reputation
6,120
Daps
112,173
Reppin
Chile
Roman's match with Taker will always make his case hard to defend. That match was so badly structured and to make things worse they couldn't come close to execute at the level they needed to. Taker was shot and Roman could not carry him at all, just a horrible night for both.

Roman vs HHH was so forgettable I literally don't remember a single thing about that match :russ:

WM 20's Triple Threat > WM 37's Triple Threat...and I fukking LOVED that Mania 37 match.

Roman vs Brock at 31 is a certified WM classic. The only WM classic Hunter has is the opener of WM 30 because Dragon forced him to step his game up like no one else has been able to do. This main event shyts on every other attempt Hunter had in singles matches that closed the show.

HHH vs Batista was solid, was it really better than this year's main event? I would have to watch it again and no fukking way I'm doing that :heh:

HHH vs Jericho or Roman/Brock at 34 are actually pretty damn even at how uninspiring and forgettable they were :francis:

WM 2000 main event was bleh.
 

Metal Face

Superstar
Joined
Dec 27, 2015
Messages
14,180
Reputation
1,031
Daps
57,841
HHH vs Batista was solid, was it really better than this year's main event? I would have to watch it again and no fukking way I'm doing that

Batista/HHH was good but not great, it was definitely better than Roman/Brock III

I forgot about Cena/HHH at 22. Crowd was hot as fukk for that so it made it watchable.
 
Top