Yeah I saw that a while back too
What's your take on how the media has portrayed the Ferguson situation.
What's your take on the main channels of news: CNN, MSNBC and Fox News
And what your take on alternative news programming: pbs newshour and npr
News is a commodity, and the best salesman will yield the highest profit margins. I don't know of any major outlet, whether for-profit or non-profit, that doesn't have a bias or self-serving agenda.
Whether it be Ferguson, or any other headline-grabbing event, all the outlets do is pander and fear-monger their audience.
I personally try to read from far right all the way to the far left(with some really obscure alternative shyt mixed in). However, before reading anything from a news source, I first learn about that source's history and try to determine their bias. Once establishing the agenda of the outlet presenting me the news, I then try to only take away the facts and try to understand why it was spun from the angle in which it was presented. You do this for all the big stories and you can frame a much clearer and concise picture of what the real news might actually be.
----
Some of my favorite obscure theories at the moment (I don't necessarily believe these, but they are most fun to think critically about):
- Edward Snowden might be a "manufactured avatar" by the State. It's impressive how he stays on talking points and enunciates (it's like watching a pro athlete give a post-game talk or an actor giving an interview). Most programmers I work with tend to be a little socially-awkward and soft-spoken. Additionally his honorable military discharge, him stating he was at one point working directly for the CIA, does not match the description of a "tech-activist/freedom-fighter". Most other programmers I work with tend to be Libertarian-leaning. And Why not just upload every document to pastebin? Some even claim Glenn Greenweld's relationship with Pierre Omidyar is a conflict of interest.
Why would they be doing this? Well diving into that requires one to go deep into the CIA's history (Mockingbird, PsyOps, etc). If it was them, they were able to control the complete narrative of story with a good vs evil scenario. Either you think he's a traitor and become even more patriotic or else you declare him a hero. All the while the real story, the real facts, fade from importance and the media capitalizes on the polarization of the people.
- Alex Jones, David Icke and the like are all disinfo agents sponsored by our black budget.
- CIA involvement in the media for the last 60+ years.
- Will Google really become SkyNet (
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/dec/17/google-boston-dynamics-robots-atlas-bigdog-cheetah,
https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000022008&year=2013,
http://www.google.com/killer-robots.txt)