You originally argued against my absolutely factual statement, supported by actual evidence, that they are synonyms. You use an article by a guy who seems to have no degree in English to do it. I showed you that your source was not comparable to my source, since you started this by implying that they are not synonyms. I responded with showing you definition a of a synonym. You responded back parroting that definition. I pointed out yes, that is the definition of what one is, and then pointed out to you that Sensible is listed as a synonym of Logical.
So, what was your point of this endeavor? You no where ever disproved my initial response to
@TEH that Sensible is not only an element of Logical, but is an actual synonym of it. What were you arguing against in that statement? What was the point of you rushing in to argue against that very factual statement? Why did you feel the need to even argue against a statement that was proven factual right in the post it was made in?