Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
I can’t call it. All GOATS.
They were phenomenal in-ring talents, but they never really drew any emotion out of me that would be engaging beyond having really good matches. To me wrestling, like any other entertainment medium, is supposed to draw emotion and reaction out of the viewer. There’s plenty of technically proficient movies I like, like a Dunkirk, but it didn’t make me really feel anything after seeing it. I was really into Benoit’s run from winning the Rumble to winning the World title, but there wasn’t much to his character beyond that climb to the top so I wasn’t as invested in his moment as I was Eddy’s. There was more of a human element and depth there because he was a more fully fleshed out character.
" Benoit that dominated the IC title scene in 2000.I actually meant strictly technical wrestling skills. Guess I didn’t make that clear in the OP. Eddie is definitely the best when it comes to charisma and personality during a match. Benoit is a rabid wolverine and Malenko is the iceman.If you mean the most well rounded performer? Eddie, and it isn’t close.
If you mean pure work rate, straight up wrestling? Benoit, and it isn’t close.