Who would win in a fight: A man with nothing to lose vs A man with everything to lose?

[Jaguar93]

Who’s mindset would allow them to win?

 

[Rawtid]

The better fighter.

 

[Neo. The Only. The One.]

Nothing to lose.

 

[Hoodoo Child]

I'm torn, because on one hand, the (Man With Nothing to Lose) is gonna fight dirty and will most likely go for that suicide blow, and on the other,
(The Man Who has Everything to Lose) is gonna come out guns blazing, full of emotion. I don't know..I guess whoever has the most will power. Skill be damned

Then again, if you have nothing to lose, you basically like "fukk it, if I die I die." That's not the mentality you wanna have before a fight.

 

[Taadow]

Which one got the shank?

 

[Lord_nikon]

 

[AlbertPullhoez]

They both had nothing to lose though

Martin was broke and Tim Robbins didn't give a fukk about life at that moment

 

[Kiyoshi-Dono]

Ryu and Akuma shouldn’t be the example for this thread
That relationship has too many intricacies to boil down to your title op

 

[Hungerpain]

Having nothing to lose dont really give you the advantage in a fight.
If anything its a disadvantage when faced against someone determined to make it home or defend they position/stake.

Men with nothing to lose Only got the advantage on doing wild risky shyt the average person wouod be too scared to do.

 

[The Guru]

A man who truly has nothing to lose has nothing to fight for.

 

[Neuromancer]

A man with nothing to lose.

 

[get these nets]

Nothing to lose guy has the advantage. No pressure on him, he will take it to the end.

 

[BlackMajik]

Unstoppable Force vs Immovable Object

 

[Orbital-Fetus]

it all comes down to penetrating another man's defense.
how many layers are you willing to pull back before you enter his core?
clenching against his exploratory probes...smh.

 

[mrfortune]

I almost had a fight with someone that told me he had nothing to lose. i believed him and forfeited. I have too much to lose