Why Did Cacs Kill The Indians Instead of Take Them As Slaves??

[Caca-faat]

Here's some undeniable proof that we are indigenous to North America brehs. I don't know how you can watch this video and not agree that we DID NOT come from Africa. We were already here!

Is what you're saying that current African Americans did not suffer through slavery?

That all those trafficed black people died during slavery leaving behind the native black people that were there before slavery and that current African Americans are a descendant of them?

Or are you saying that slavery didnt happen?

Asking for clarification

 

[Rell Lauren]

They did initially but the Indians couldn't handle the work and a lot of them died due to the diseases Europeans brought to the Americas.

Thread should have been locked after this. They also weren't physically equipped to work in the heat like African slaves (melanin in their skin provided better protection against the sun).

 

[ultraflexed]

I am only talking about the USA in my post.

Edit: A total 10 million slaves were brought over period. Again, factoring in the deplorable living conditions and high rate of death especially for children the number still do not add up.

10 million over 300 years is a little over 30,000 people a year

Your logic is off, deplorable living conditions means nothing in terms of population considering third world countries have some of the highest populations in the world, also factoring in intentional breeding to create more slaves for cheap and super slaves for sale that multipler definitely goes up

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Your logic is off, deplorable living conditions means nothing in terms of population considering third world countries have some of the highest populations in the world, also factoring in intentional breeding to create more slaves for cheap and super slaves for sale that multipler definitely goes up

Did those countries grow their population from 0 to 4 million in a few hundred years dying before 25? I think your logic is off. Big difference between being poor and being a slave.

Did you say super slave? Lol Really? And more than half of those super slave babies were dying at birth and of those another half died before the age of 2. This huge mass breeding didn't exist. You can't create strong humans out of those conditions.

Edit: also with those 25 years a woman can only have babies 10 out of those years. And given the stats she likely would have died well before 5 children. And of those children half would die at birth. If she had 2 children that went into adulthood she would be lucky.

You really think with such a low import rate they were able to raise a population of miss treated people being worked to death in 5 generations to 4 million? Come on man

 

[ultraflexed]

Did those countries grow their population from 0 to 4 million in a few hundred years dying before 25? I think your logic is off. Big difference between being poor and being a slave.

Did you say super slave? Lol Really? And more than half of those super slave babies were dying at birth and of those another half died before the age of 2. This huge mass breeding didn't exist. You can't create strong humans out of those conditions.

Edit: also with those 25 years a woman can only have babies 10 out of those years. And given the stats she likely would have died well before 5 children. And of those children half would die at birth. If she had 2 children that went into adulthood she would be lucky.

Third world countries have similar living conditions as slaves, some of them have slaves present day

And "super slave " is a actual terms and did happen, here the links to multiple articles

history of super slave breeding in America - Google Search

By 1850 there over 3 million slaves, this doesnt included escaped slaves to the north or west, or freed slaves living throughout the United states over the last 150 years prior, that only accounts for the slaves in the south.

Link to modern day slavery in third world countries, these places have high populations

 

[ultraflexed]

Back to the main point

Present day african americans are not related to the austreneans-historical africans that were in america post slavery

The only exception is if you take a dna test and austrenean bloodlines pops up, then you can make a case

 

[Leasy]

Back to the main point

Present day african americans are not related to the austreneans-historical africans that were in america post slavery

The only exception is if you take a dna test and austrenean bloodlines pops up, then you can make a case

You can’t take that shyt for word when they have a so called Jewish DNA and they not even the real Jews.

 

[ultraflexed]

You can’t take that shyt for word when they have a so called Jewish DNA and they not even the real Jews.

Jewish is not a race

 

[Dzali OG]

Aliens?

It's just White people. You can find the real history in libraries around the world particularly in London. A member here from London has actually helped retrieve such documents for Black Americans. The victor gets to write history. It isn't any more complicated than than.

Not saying it's aliens, just showing we have no idea...

And no, I don't believe the complete, real history is available in any book available to the public.

 

[Dzali OG]

And how did they come to that conclusion?

Not sure how...but I'd like to know if it has been proven so?

 

[Dzali OG]

Thread should have been locked after this. They also weren't physically equipped to work in the heat like African slaves (melanin in their skin provided better protection against the sun).

Have you actually considered the absurdity of this?

Why couldn't they stand the heat and sun in a land WHERE THEY'RE NATIVE TOO???

 

[Dzali OG]

Did those countries grow their population from 0 to 4 million in a few hundred years dying before 25? I think your logic is off. Big difference between being poor and being a slave.

Did you say super slave? Lol Really? And more than half of those super slave babies were dying at birth and of those another half died before the age of 2. This huge mass breeding didn't exist. You can't create strong humans out of those conditions.

Edit: also with those 25 years a woman can only have babies 10 out of those years. And given the stats she likely would have died well before 5 children. And of those children half would die at birth. If she had 2 children that went into adulthood she would be lucky.

You really think with such a low import rate they were able to raise a population of miss treated people being worked to death in 5 generations to 4 million? Come on man

Third world countries have similar living conditions as slaves, some of them have slaves present day

And "super slave " is a actual terms and did happen, here the links to multiple articles

history of super slave breeding in America - Google Search

By 1850 there over 3 million slaves, this doesnt included escaped slaves to the north or west, or freed slaves living throughout the United states over the last 150 years prior, that only accounts for the slaves in the south.

Link to modern day slavery in third world countries, these places have high populations

I pose another question in your discord...

Europeans often display a view that africans were barely human. Some even say we really didn't have a language and communicated with beeps and bloops and gestures.

Now...what type of people knowing they're in chattel slavery, would breed so prolifically? Basically like animals.

Are yall aware that until recently, people couldn't even get some of the more intelligent animals to breed in zoo's? I'm talking in like the last 100 years. It's why they make a fuss now all over the news when some ANIMALS breed in a zoo.

I'm unsure how to feel what's suggested.

 

[Premeditated]

I don’t think we can just blindly call them natives....we were here as well...how long have we been here??...who was here first??

even if we were to go by your logic and say, black folks were here too, it wouldn't change the fact that the "indian" are still Native because they were here for thousands of years before

I recently took a tour of the Whitney plantation in Louisiana and this was precisely what the tour guide said, which made sense.

why they got a senegalese dude giving a black american girl a tour of an american slave plantation?

 

[skeetsinternal]

even if we were to go by your logic and say, black folks were here too, it wouldn't change the fact that the "indian" are still Native because they were here for thousands of years before

why they got a senegalese dude giving a black american girl a tour of an american slave plantation?

At the plantation there were records engraved on plaques with the names of Africans from different lands in Africa. The tour not only has narrative from the ADOS perspective but also from the perspective from Africans

 

[ultraflexed]

I pose another question in your discord...

Europeans often display a view that africans were barely human. Some even say we really didn't have a language and communicated with beeps and bloops and gestures.

Now...what type of people knowing they're in chattel slavery, would breed so prolifically? Basically like animals.

Are yall aware that until recently, people couldn't even get some of the more intelligent animals to breed in zoo's? I'm talking in like the last 100 years. It's why they make a fuss now all over the news when some ANIMALS breed in a zoo.

I'm unsure how to feel what's suggested.

Just like slaves were forced to be slaves, they were also forced to breed thr strongest male slaves with the strongest females slaves, this common knowledge.