Why do brehs act like the Forbes lists are completely false?

[Carlton Banks]

They may not be completely accurate, but they definitely in the same ball park. These nikkas stay in and out of courts where all their earnings come out. Most celebrities with legal issues will have close to accurate info about them with finances (unless you're considering illegal finances too).

These celebs want you to think these lists are inaccurate so they can brag and allude to even more about their wealth cuz nikkas is just ego driven and narcissistic like that.

 

[Ozymandeas]

Sometimes they’re in the ball park. But not all asset holdings are public information. Plenty of rich people own private (non-traded) companies so how can Forbes know anything about that or they own all sorts of opaque esoteric investments that can’t be quantified. The Panama Papers should’ve let you know rich people owns all sorts of assets behind closed doors. Plus, most rich people lose count of what they’re worth and its easy to see why. My crypto and my stocks swing up and down constantly so I can drop by thousands of dollars depending upon on the week and I’m a regular 9 to 5 nikka. Imagine nikkas with billions or hundreds of millions of dollars. Look at Mark Zuckerberg this week. That white boy lost BILLIONS.

 

[Carlton Banks]

@YaThreadFloppedB!

 

[Carlton Banks]

That's crazy

 

[Secure Da Bag]

I'm never gonna be in that list, so what do I care. Plus, that whole magazine is about rich people bragging to everyone else.

 

[MoveForward]

The issue is, people have the hardest time understanding net worth vs. liquid net worth.

 

[ThrobbingHood]

The Forbes list is as accurate as a woman telling you her body count.