They can abort the baby without telling the man and/or against his wishes, which is perfectly fine.
However, they can also choose to keep the baby against the man's wishes.
Why are women allowed to hold your sperm hostage?
They can poke a hole in a condom, get pregnant, milk the man for child support (18 years, 18 years), and this is completely legal in the United States.
I can see how forcing a woman to have an abortion is difficult, and some would argue that it is cruel --- but how is it not as cruel as holding a man's sperm hostage and creating a child of his against his wishes? To avoid this possible difficulty, if women did not want to risk the chance of being forced to abort a baby because of an accidental pregnancy, they could have the man preemptively approve any possible pregnancy before sex.
It's something that people don't think about because we are so conditioned, but the technology and medicine is available to terminate pregnancies with no pain whatsoever.
There should be a cut-off date for the decision, of course.. like a week after the man is notified that the women got pregnant. So, both parents sign off on a birth, and only one has to refuse in order for the pregnancy not to be carried out. In what way is that not fair? Each partner contributes 50% to the potential human being, yet the potential mother is given 100% control?
However, they can also choose to keep the baby against the man's wishes.
Why are women allowed to hold your sperm hostage?
They can poke a hole in a condom, get pregnant, milk the man for child support (18 years, 18 years), and this is completely legal in the United States.

I can see how forcing a woman to have an abortion is difficult, and some would argue that it is cruel --- but how is it not as cruel as holding a man's sperm hostage and creating a child of his against his wishes? To avoid this possible difficulty, if women did not want to risk the chance of being forced to abort a baby because of an accidental pregnancy, they could have the man preemptively approve any possible pregnancy before sex.
It's something that people don't think about because we are so conditioned, but the technology and medicine is available to terminate pregnancies with no pain whatsoever.
There should be a cut-off date for the decision, of course.. like a week after the man is notified that the women got pregnant. So, both parents sign off on a birth, and only one has to refuse in order for the pregnancy not to be carried out. In what way is that not fair? Each partner contributes 50% to the potential human being, yet the potential mother is given 100% control?





So "crazy bytches" are allowed to deceive you into having a child with them cause they're crazy?
