gangreen
Top Notch
Watching this Nets and Bulls Game.
If a game goes to overtime, the number of fouls needed to foul out should be seven, not six.
it would allow a for a higher chance that the best players will be out on the floor deciding the game. And thats what the players, teams, fans, and the league want to see. So, why not allow for one more foul in overtime?
If the game goes to a second overtime, the foul limit is still seven, it does not increase to eight. This allows players a better chance to stay in the game, but doesnt make it impossible for them to foul out.
If a player fouled out in regulation, he is out of the game. He does not get a chance to reenter the game just because the foul limit is expanded.
If a game goes to overtime, the number of fouls needed to foul out should be seven, not six.
it would allow a for a higher chance that the best players will be out on the floor deciding the game. And thats what the players, teams, fans, and the league want to see. So, why not allow for one more foul in overtime?
If the game goes to a second overtime, the foul limit is still seven, it does not increase to eight. This allows players a better chance to stay in the game, but doesnt make it impossible for them to foul out.
If a player fouled out in regulation, he is out of the game. He does not get a chance to reenter the game just because the foul limit is expanded.


