Why have I been banned from Mike Brown threads? EDIT: requesting a ban. I'm out.

[I'm Billy FUCO!!]

@cook @Brooklynzson

Check ALL of my posts in the following threads, which I now appear to have been banned from. In each one, for me it says "You have insufficient privileges to reply here.", but new recent replies are coming in from other posters......I'm also still able to reply in other threads

http://www.thecoli.com/threads/the-...son-darren-official-release-by-police.240232/

http://www.thecoli.com/threads/full...alleged-robbery-at-convenie-nce-store.240799/

Give me one good reason why I should've gotten banned from either of them. And please don't tell me "trolling", because all I did was share my opinion on various details of the story (regardless of how many people might've disagreed). I never made fun of the victim's death or the tragedy itself; I only clowned on some of the stupid stuff that dudes was saying in the thread. I've even made several long-ass serious posts about the story itself, in those threads. Examples:

The more I think about it, the more I realize......it's OVER



- the robbery is caught on camera, and the suspect fits Mike Brown's appearance by most accounts. And if it was him, then not only did he steal from the store, but when the store worker tried to block him off, he roughed him up. Do we REALLY think that isn't gonna be significant when discussing whether he might have engaged a cop in a fight, or possible reached for his gun? THAT'S the worst part about the robbery; not the fact that he stole some shyt. Unlike Trayvon, they have DIRECT PROOF that dude was confrontational, and not hesitant to get physical.....

- the friend Dorian, in the very least, was NOT 100% truthful when giving his version of the story (if you believe he was involved in the robbery). He might not have initially denied being involved in the robbery (to my knowledge) but he never acknowledged it, which is still bad. Not only that, he made it seem like they hadn't been causing any trouble that day ("we didn't cause harm to nobody") yet dude on the footage who looks like his boy, was roughing up the store worker during the robbery. Either way, as long as people believed they robbed the store, his credibility has taken a significant hit

- the friend Dorian has apparently confessed to the robbery to authorities.....

shyt is looking pretty good for the cop right now........unless we see video of the actual shooting or get another legit witness to it, that cop is gonna walk. nikkas on the coli can try to separate the robbery from the shooting all they want, but the fact is that AIN'T happening in real life. If this shyt goes to trial then the robbery will be VERY relevant, like it or not.

Now.....the police need to clear up something. The chief is saying that the cop wasn't aware of the robbery during the shooting, yet apparently the police report on the incident said the cop was aware.....which one is it........

These nikkas still up in here acting like it's relevant whether or not the cop was aware of the robbery when he stopped Mike

The ONLY 2 things that might still get the cop charged/convicted at this point, is 1. if it's shown that Mike didn't assault him to a degree to justify shooting him under law, and 2. if there are credible witnesses/a video recording that indicates that the cop wasn't covered by law when he shot Mike

EVERYTHING else is pretty much irrelevant at this point. The ONLY details that can get the cop charged/convicted now, is what happened during his actual encounter with Mike

The surveillance tape being released puts the cop three points ahead to even the game that this case has become: 1. it destroys that "Mike Brown was an innocent angel" angle by showing him committing a crime, 2. the video shows Mike Brown capable of being confrontational and not being above putting hands on someone, i.e. the cop, and 3. It hits the credibility of his friend

So it's no wonder these nikkas are trying so hard to act like the robbery is irrelevant

I'd like an explanation

 

[I'm Billy FUCO!!]

@cook @Brooklynzson C'mon now....I have a right to discuss this story just like everyone else......it's almost been a day since I posted this thread.....

I need answers

 

[Brooklynzson]

@cook @Brooklynzson C'mon now....I have a right to discuss this story just like everyone else......it's almost been a day since I posted this thread.....

I need answers

Wasn't really on all weekend, i don't know why you were banned. @houston911

 

[Houston911]

Wasn't really on all weekend, i don't know why you were banned. @houston911

Tasteless trolling
Baiting

 

[I'm Billy FUCO!!]

Tasteless trolling
Baiting

And not ONE example quoted/mentioned by you from those threads, for proof

WHAT trolling/baiting? I didn't say/do ANYTHING that other nikkas in them threads was saying....other than maybe not being on the militant "the cop is guilty as fukk even though I don't know all the facts" shyt

Dudes calling me and other dudes c00ns, cacs, and everything else under the sun....but I was the one trolling/baiting?

Here is EVERY SINGLE other post I made in those 2 threads (other than the 2 quotes I already posted above. Also, the only thing removed from the posts is the smilies I used, to make the posts easier to read in here)

Tell me which one of these posts counts as trolling/baiting, and why....so me and everybody else can know what we aren't allowed to post on the coli, and so I can make sure I'm not being treated differently from other nikkas in those threads who did the SAME shyt and are still allowed to post

From this thread: http://www.thecoli.com/threads/the-...son-darren-official-release-by-police.240232/

HOLD UP.....

So y'all nikkas had the wrong officer before?

Here's the problem.....if people intend to look at the cop's history (and there's no way that's NOT gonna happen/already happening), then there's no reason not to look at the deceased's history as well. You can't do for one, and not the other....

You can't (hypothetically) say "oh, so the cop was accused of beating an innocent man a year ago? That shows he has anger/judgment problems, and he was likely to have murder the kid for no reason".......

.......then turn around and say "yeah, the deceased assaulted people before/got into fights, but that don't mean he started shyt with the cop....his past has nothing to do with THIS incident".......

Gotta be fair......whether dude was unarmed or not......


On this one, I'll say.....and this is my amateur view here......I've heard various news outlets discuss whether the number of shots really mattered.....most of the people discussing it seemed to agree that it doesn't

When cops shoot, they shoot to kill just like they're trained. All of that "they shoulda fired a warning shot/only shot his leg" shyt, is from civilians who don't know exactly what the law allows cops to do, and who've never been in dangerous situations like cops are sometimes in

Bottom line seems to be: either the cop was justified in shooting (whether once or several times), or he was wrong for shooting AT ALL. Apparently there may be no in-between (i.e. number of shots) when it comes to THE LAW. Again, I'm just guessing with this, so if someone can show me where I'm wrong, please do so......

It DOES change things, and favors the cop more.....

But that cop is still in hot water until he can PROVE the situation was dire enough to justify shooting that dude....

And this is coming from ME, of all people

EDIT: I will say this, though.....I didn't see the interviews that the friend gave.......but did he legit made it seem like he was with ol' boy the whole time that day, and that ol' boy didn't do shyt? If so.....

who is this?

EDIT: That's the officer in question?








Scooby Scooby Willman....where are you? WE GOT SOME WORK TO GIVE YOU

Spoiler

I don't support murking dude....but I HAD to make that comment

OH MY GOD

Please tell me this isn't the same eloquent nikka who was being interviewed and telling everybody what went down. CAN'T be him. PLEASE tell me this is another friend

Could somebody PLEASE tell me if Dorian Johnson ever made it seem like he was with Mike Brown the whole time, and that they didn't do anything wrong before the cops came?

I was about to watch his interview myself.......but I googled and saw that he gave more than one interview....I ain't got time for that

Was JUST about to post this

How do nikkas not get that

As long as it's confirmed that the robbery was reported to police before Brown got shot (and especially if a description was given during the call), that cop is clear in terms of being able to say he was looking for a suspect fitting Brown's description

At this point, the ONLY thing that the cop is still on the hook for, is whether whatever happened between him and Brown during their actual encounter, was enough to justify shooting him. That's it.

The friend made it seem as if they didn't do any shyt that day....and now here comes the proof that they DID. His credibility is GONE.

at the reach for technicalities now....

Dorian Johnson: "We wasn't causing any harm to nobody......"

How do you know this?

I mean, really, though....

Some of y'all dudes who are still claiming the cop had no idea about the robbery at the time of the shooting......y'all need to THINK......

For real....think about all the times y'all nikkas complained about cops falsely or randomly profiling/harassing/shootin' nikkas.....

Now here it is, we have a reported robbery of a store. Camera stills are now being released showing the robbery, and the suspect REALLY looks like Mike Brown. A short time after that, Mike Brown is stopped by a cop (and shot).

Are you nikkas SERIOUSLY up in here suggesting that the cop - not knowing about the robbery - just randomly decided to fukk with some random nikka that day......who just happened to be Mike Brown......who just happened to fit the description of the dude we now know robbed the store.....yet the cop had no idea about the incident? That just might be the biggest coincidence in history

Come on, now.....STOP y'all foolishness up in here.....

Mmmmm.....not as violent as I thought it would be.....


But still.......looks like they stole that shyt

......AGAIN.......

Even if the cop wasn't aware of the robbery.......if you think for ONE second that Mike Brown's actions/demeanor in that surveillance video won't be considered relevant to the alleged circumstances of the shooting that happened a short time afterwards (should this shyt go to trial).......then I wanna smoke whatever you smokin' nikka, because that's some GOOD shyt right there

Only on the coli does forming an opinion based on the facts available at the time = riding with ANYONE

I don't ride for nothing but the truth when it comes to cases like these. The truth comes from the available facts, not from biased-ass cops OR biased-ass coli militants

1. If........muthafukka, I said IF......it is to be believed that Mike Brown initiated a struggle with the cop and tried to get his gun or otherwise cause serious harm to him....then the cop is covered, and will walk...and SHOULD walk. That's the story that got Zimmerman off; that's what will also get the cop off.....that is, if those other so-called witnesses have their credibility destroyed, like Dorian's credibility apparently is (or some other smoking gun is produced against the cop). He won't walk because Mike robbed a store; he'll walk because Mike gave him legal justification to shoot. And again....based on that surveillance video.....that's not exactly hard to believe.......

2. Damn right about the pic. Never posted it, never will......hold up, why you tryna see my pic, anyway? I don't swing that way, brehthren......

Fine.....replace "fukk him over" with "get him convicted". Happy?

Done.....but only because that was a 10-second job

But Isn't this a different cac from the one posted earlier, who was shown near the body as it was being placed in a vehicle?

Damn......if I learned one thing from this thread, it's to NEVER trust the internet to get all the facts right the first time

How many times y'all done posted the wrong cop's pic & name, in here and other threads.....

From this thread: http://www.thecoli.com/threads/full...alleged-robbery-at-convenie-nce-store.240799/

nikkas got mad as fukk after this footage been released

Caused Mike Brown to go from "that angel without a criminal record who was about to go to college ", to " aight so he stole some shyt and shoved one of the store workers.....what that got to do with anything"

Yes, you are

robbery
[rob-uh-ree]
noun, plural robberies.
1.
the act, the practice, or an instance of robbing.
2.
Law. the felonious taking of the property of another from his or her person or in his or her immediate presence, against his or her will, by violence or intimidation.


He stole shyt......then when the store worker tried to stop him, he intimidated him by grabbing him and shoving him away (the shove could also be considered violent too, depending on how hard it was done)

@houston911


And @cook @Brooklynzson , keep in mind I ain't been using any aliases to make any other posts in this thread or anywhere else. Y'all know y'all can easily check for that yourselves, too.......

 

[I'm Billy FUCO!!]

@Brooklynzson @cook @houston911 Still waiting to clear this up, another day later.....

 

[Blackout]

 

[cook]

looks like your not banned from this one

http://www.thecoli.com/threads/ferguson-police-execute-an-unarmed-17-yr-old-boy.239075

 

[I'm Billy FUCO!!]

looks like your not banned from this one

http://www.thecoli.com/threads/ferguson-police-execute-an-unarmed-17-yr-old-boy.239075

I realized yesterday that I'm not banned from the main stickied one, which is all well and good......

But I was responding to persons in those other two PARTICULAR threads. I was literally in the middle of responding to someone in the second thread I linked above, when I realized I got banned from it....

My point is, I shouldn't have been banned from ANY of them threads without good reason. I could understand if I said something in those 2 threads that was off the wall, to be banned from those particular threads....fine.....but just look at all my posts. There's NOTHING in there that's any worse that what the average anti-cac/cop poster is posting

All @houston911 is saying is trolling/baiting, and apparently can't even highlight an example out of everything I mentioned above to justify it.....how is that fair?

 

[cook]

I realized yesterday that I'm not banned from the main stickied one, which is all well and good......

But I was responding to persons in those other two PARTICULAR threads. I was literally in the middle of responding to someone in the second thread I linked above, when I realized I got banned from it....

My point is, I shouldn't have been banned from ANY of them threads without good reason. I could understand if I said something in those 2 threads that was off the wall, to be banned from those particular threads....fine.....but just look at all my posts. There's NOTHING in there that's any worse that what the average anti-cac/cop poster is posting

All @houston911 is saying is trolling/baiting, and apparently can't even highlight an example out of everything I mentioned above to justify it.....how is that fair?

i suggest you ask him. what good is me asking him then having to relay the message.

 

[I'm Billy FUCO!!]

i suggest you ask him. what good is me asking him then having to relay the message.

I'm only tagging you and Brooklynzson along with him, so I can get a response from someone else in case he doesn't reply.....which he hasn't been doing, despite being online right now and me tagging him 3 times so far......

 

[Houston911]

I'm only tagging you and Brooklynzson along with him, so I can get a response from someone else in case he doesn't reply.....which he hasn't been doing, despite being online right now and me tagging him 3 times so far......

I'll get at you when I get to a desktop

Why are you playing dumb though? All you do is try to get a rise out of people

You're unhappy cuz you can't make "inflammatory" posts in a thread about a teenager getting killed?

 

[I'm Billy FUCO!!]

I'll get at you when I get to a desktop

Why are you playing dumb though? All you do is try to get a rise out of people

You're unhappy cuz you can't make "inflammatory" posts in a thread about a teenager getting killed?

Again.....WHAT inflammatory posts?

The WORST thing I said about Mike Brown, was when I acknowledged the FACT that he was not the completely innocent angel that nikkas was tryna sell earlier, and that he actually did break the law and displayed aggressiveness. Those are FACTS, not opinion (caught on video). Stating facts is being inflammatory, now?

But I'll bet THESE nikkas ain't get banned for these comments they made against other posters......from the SAME threads:

Shut the fukk up F@GGOT. Matter of fact, one yourself.

Stealing swishers, candy or anything for that matter does not justify killing an unarmed person. If you can't see that you're truly lost. Murder is Murder regardless of whether someone committed a crime before hand. It's just not justified for a police officer who is supposed to protect and serve the community to kill someone even if he believed they were stealing unless there was a real threat to his life. You're truly a lost young man.

stfu u little bytch lmao

you're an idiot if you dont understand what I said.

Let me sum it up to you unintelligent c00n.

I'm not going to war for a guy who was commiting a crime earlier in the day that put him in that position.
Now is it fukked up. yes. Should the cop be investigated and charged if necessary. yes. Will I be participating in Marches, changing twitter avi or hash tagging #Justiceformikebrown nope. Thats his family job.

What got everyone to mobilize was the rumors that this kid was a law abiding citizen that got executed seemingly because he was black. the more and more info we find out .. we find out thats hardly the truth.

Go march you c00n .. you sheep but I'll stay right here. hope the family gets justice. . but for an entire race to be clamoring like this is some great racial injustice is ridiculous.

These same threads have SEVERAL posters saying ACTUAL inflammatory shyt, and saying all types of shyt about cacs, cops and even other posters....and I get singed out? And can't nobody even highlight the 'inflammatory' posts in question that I made?

I have NEVER made fun of Mike Brown's actual shooting/death.

I have NEVER even suggested that I believed without any doubt that his killing was justified (and even if I believed it, I should be allowed to state that, since apparently everyone else is allowed to claim the cop straight-up murdered him, without any evidence behind it )

It seems to me that your idea of trying to "get a rise out of people", is simply having a different opinion. If someone gets a rise out of me not believing without proof that the cop murdered him in cold blood, then that's THEIR problem, not mine

If you're gonna ban me from threads, for just having a different opinion on Mike Brown and not following the coli militant hivemind, then at least admit it and stop hiding behind this 'trolling' excuse

 

[H.I.M.]

for cacs killing black kids and make jokes about their deaths...but get offended to the point of snitching and getting a poster banned from the site for making fun of dead cac kids brehs.

http://www.thecoli.com/threads/inappropriate-comments-about-sandy-hook-killing-kids.170609/

@bk @Brooklynzson

This nikka @OhLawd done lost his damn mind

First he makes a post praising a bunch of white kids getting murked in the Sandy Hook shooting:



I did the appropriate thing and simply reported it, and the post was deleted. Cool.

Now he's still running on:






C'mon now.....

Certain people got thread-banned and even full-banned for posting pics/smilies of Trayvon's body..... or for 'trolling' just because they appeared to be pro-Zimmerman. But the coli is gonna let this fly?

I don't mind the anti-white shyt since that's a coli standard .......but we really gonna find repeated calls for the death of children acceptable? Especially when it references and praises a recent, real-life incident?

 

[I'm Billy FUCO!!]

for cacs killing black kids and make jokes about their deaths...but get offended to the point of snitching and getting a poster banned from the site for making fun of dead cac kids brehs.

Please post one example of me making jokes about Mike Brown's death.......since you felt the need to jump in here ......