Why Is It That A Woman That Can Abort Her Child And Be Considered "Pro-Choice"

[CrimsonTider]

Why does a man forfeit what happens to the fetus?

Because He had the say so on where the fetus was created.

Transfer of "choice"

 

[Throwbacksample]

Something that happens with no regard to the thoughts, feelings or concerns of the man.

Two people can have sex and the woman can choose to abort the child while the man wants to keep it. And yet..again, his thoughts, feelings and concerns are discarded.

This is easy for many women to ignore and chalk up to some callous idea of "risks of sex". But almost assuredly if a man could have a child and he could abort it or handcuff a woman to 18 years of financial burden without any input from her...we wouldn't hear the end of it.

If it takes 2 to conceive a child, it certainly should involve 2 (TO A DEGREE) to decide what happens after.

If that seems like an outrageous concept to some people, then that's really pathetic.

Not that i agree with tommy sotomayor...this is his main point...if you give men the option of having kids..98 percent would not want the child..yet the woman still has the child by a dude who doesnt want a child and then calls him a deadbeat...men should have a say so in the wanting the kid

 

[Remote]

Because He had the say so on where the fetus was created.

Transfer of "choice"

Except maybe he didn't.

Maybe he only (and she only) put their "say-so" on having sex...not intending to create a child.
This argument that having sex automatically means you are somehow consenting to have a child is ludicrous.

 

[CrimsonTider]

Except maybe he didn't.

Maybe he only (and she only) put their "say-so" on having sex...not intending to create a child.
This argument that having sex automatically means you are somehow consenting to have a child is ludicrous.

The man chooses to nut in the girl and thats the beginning of the process to create a child.

You can wear a condom or pull out instead of trying to convince a woman to abort or complaining that you have no say so

 

[SheWantTheD]

 

[Remote]

The man chooses to nut in the girl and thats the beginning of the process to create a child.

You can wear a condom or pull out instead of trying to convince a woman to abort or complaining that you have no say so

The problem is that you're placing 100% of the responsibility for conceiving a child on the man.
As if he conceives a child out of thin air.
There's a woman involved.
A woman who chose to engage in sex.
A woman who chose to not use protection (condoms exist for women in case you're unaware).
A woman who chose to go ahead with a man who may not have used protection.

And you're sitting there talking about 1 side shouldering everything.

And THEN...he has ZERO SAY...until 9 months later...then he has 18 years of responsibilities.
All him.

or......
All that same stuff happens....except the woman could chose to abort the child...against the man's wishes....and fukk him because who gives a shyt about what the man thinks or feels or anything.
One of my friends had his GF get an abortion without his consent and it drove him into a depression for well over a year. I've seen both sides to this shyt.

So you can't tell me shyt about how any 1 side should have 100% of the responsibility or blame or decision.

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

What is a congressman going to do about a social stigma?



I just reported you for trying to derail my thread, let's stay on topic here.

That's the point.

If legislation can't (it's really won't) do anything then why even stress it?