Will Fans Turn On Today Product For Historical Content

Green Ranger

I Am Legend
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
30,146
Reputation
2,376
Daps
67,883
Reppin
Angel Grove California
http://www.newsday.com/sports/pro-w...-monday-night-raw-says-ex-espn-exec-1.6792614

The history of WWEWWE superstar John Cena

On Monday night, one of WWE’s current Superstars, CM Punk, teamed with one of its greatest tag teams of the past, the New Age Outlaws. The Outlaws turned on Punk, leaving him to be pummeled by the dastardly Shield on USA’s Monday Night Raw.

Therein lies perhaps the biggest risk of the soon-to-debut WWE Network: that fans will turn on today’s content and just focus on the treasure trove of historical goodies -- which will include every pay-per-view ever produced by WWE, WCW and ECW.

In an article on WWE.com listing nine facts you need to know about the WWE Network before it launches on Feb. 24, the company pushes the edgier content of yesteryear.

“If you fondly remember a time before WWE went TV-PG, WWE Network will include Attitude Era content in all its grimy glory,” the article says. “That’s unrestrained, uncensored and unedited, just the way you remember it. In other words, you can ease up on the bootleg YouTube searches, call your middle-school buddies over and relive the moments that made you go scream, ‘Oh hell yeah!’”

Larry Mann, a former vice president of sales with ESPN who is now executive vice president of business development for Chicago-based sports marketing company Revolution, is intrigued by the WWE Network concept. But he also cautions that building the online network at the peril of its core TV product is a risk. The network will also offer its pay-per-views along with so much other content for $9.99 a month.

Mann wonders if the oversaturation of content will lead to an “erosion” of TV ratings.

“Or, does it maybe potentially help boost USA TV ratings because with the digital component they’re able to expand and broaden their awareness?” Mann said. “Maybe it becomes a win-win and this becomes a secondary tool to drive a higher awareness for the product.”

Mann and Revolution were once involved with TNA Wrestling when it tried to get off the ground on cable TV via Fox Sports Net.

“We were the eighth stepchild trying to compete against a 400-pound gorilla,” he said of dealing with a product competing with WWE. He’s impressed enough with WWE to deduce that the company did its homework to best mitigate the risk.

“I’m sure they [WWE] had plenty of conversations with USA prior to doing this,” Mann said. "My guess is they took the research that they did, and when they walked in to USA Network and pitched that this is the direction that they’re going to go, was that they could help grow the vehicle rather than continue the slide.”

Monday Night Raw ratings are not what they were during the Attitude Era, partly due to creative direction but also a general ratings dilution all of TV has dealt with due to the proliferation of channels. Mobile content has only increased that issue. Mann thinks if WWE doesn’t gut its TV product by providing too much online, the “360 degree” platform WWE provides could be attractive as an advertising package.

“The TV-everywhere concept in many cases is to try to appeal to the youth,” says Mann, who helps brands make media buys. “Not only youth, but also technical-savvy individuals that may not watch as much television but they’re on the go and they have an interest in a product like WWE. This just allows them broaden their reach. As a media buyer like myself, this is the challenge we face, to help brands. Now, let’s say I have a brand that’s interested in exploring a partnership with WWE. Well, depending on the brand’s objectives and who they’re trying to target, now I have a whole new way to go about it.”
 

Hoss

Legalize us.
Joined
Jul 8, 2012
Messages
2,581
Reputation
800
Daps
9,816
Reppin
The North
I've been thinking about this exact issue. I was wondering if they are at all concerned about exposing their current product as watered-down and losing adult viewers as a result.

A lot of us only watch today's product because there's no strong alternative. We sit around waiting for the rare epic moments instead of enjoying the product consistently like we did when the product was so much better.
 

El Cocodrilo

Superstar
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
6,100
Reputation
999
Daps
15,979
Reppin
NULL

It would be funny if WWE is forced to produce actually compelling Monday Night RAWs because mainstream wrestling fans can get all the wrestling they want more easily through the WWE Network.
Hypothetically, it would be similar to the effect WCW had on the product in the 90's... like "Either we make sure this shyt is entertaining every week or we are gonna get squashed :lupe:"

Of course... it's not like you can lose against yourself :beli:

Only thing that could happen is RAW becomes meaningless as society moves away from "TV" and more and more content is streamed.

:whoo:THE FUTURE.
 

DANJ!

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
8,626
Reputation
4,097
Daps
28,071
Reppin
Baltimore
Here's where the article falls flat...

Because no matter how good the product was in the past, and of course it was... anyone that's been watching for years and still do are watching because no matter how much they like/don't like today's product, they still wanna know what happens next. WWE doesn't risk losing viewers of the current shyt because realistically, the "just watch the old shyt instead" option has been there since people started putting shyt on Youtube. Of course, the WWE Network archive is gonna be insanely extensive, but I doubt people are gonna just sit there and ruffle thru old Raw episodes at 8pm on a Monday when the new ep is airing live. After all, if they have the Network, they can watch it any time they want- doesn't HAVE to be Monday night, does it?
 

Momentum

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
25,830
Reputation
814
Daps
60,106
Reppin
NULL
I've been thinking about this exact issue. I was wondering if they are at all concerned about exposing their current product as watered-down and losing adult viewers as a result.

A lot of us only watch today's product because there's no strong alternative. We sit around waiting for the rare epic moments instead of enjoying the product consistently like we did when the product was so much better.
If WCW still existed, I'd have no idea who the fukk John Cena was.
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,075
Daps
14,888
which fans are u talking about OP, fans of age that watch todays product have stuck it out regardless so i fail to see how a video library is going to change their mind.The kids and tweens that watch now dont know how good/great things were, you cant miss what you never knew existed.That shyt has been on youtube, justin tv or some stream site in one form or another for years and no one cottoned on and said to themselves "wow todays product is really shyt".

Even as someone who was in their 20s during the flabby years of attitude when i watch 90/00s matches now it doesnt grab me the same way it did because i am not in that time/space today.Its not like a boxing/mma fight you can just dust off and watch anytime u need to be in the moment
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
72,434
Reputation
15,368
Daps
100,849
Reppin
CHICAGO
if scott keith did not watch wrasslin in favor of the old shyt, for some years.

i would think that is a good indication, this is a possibility.
especially since, they were stoopid enough to unify the title.
heading into the launching of a network.
with a track record of failing to produce consistent quality tv.
on top of the fact, most networks with vanity labels.
all produce tv, that is an industry leader.
which was because subscription based tv, was falling by the wayside.
till subscription based channels changed the game and started to offer quality evolution style tv programming.
that forced all media to up its actual quality or windup losing completely .
which is why tv is like going to the movies now.

wwe does not understand this, and could suffer.
as the wwe network has no actual quality programming slated for its launch.
plus, has track record that shuns quality and fan interaction about said quality as well.


art barr
 

TheWhackMamba

The Coli's Drop Bear
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
4,663
Reputation
1,993
Daps
9,474
Reppin
Western Australia
I've been thinking about this exact issue. I was wondering if they are at all concerned about exposing their current product as watered-down and losing adult viewers as a result.

A lot of us only watch today's product because there's no strong alternative. We sit around waiting for the rare epic moments instead of enjoying the product consistently like we did when the product was so much better.

2 reasons;

1 highlighted above.

2. People who love wrestling (fukk spots entertainment) want to see what is new and what is going on. We know that today's product is garbage compared to 1997-8-9 WWF or WCW (entertainment wise) , but its better than watching the Bold and the Beautiful. They have the same king of hyperbole story lines with 0% of the wrestling.

The E knows people like me, @Kind Gentleman @Twitter @krackdagawd gonna keep watching because we respect what happened in the day and hope the E will come out of the PG era end produce more ether.


But if it doesn't, it's still better than 99% of the retardedness that one see's on television these days
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,075
Daps
14,888
2 reasons;

1 highlighted above.

2. People who love wrestling (fukk spots entertainment) want to see what is new and what is going on. We know that today's product is garbage compared to 1997-8-9 WWF or WCW (entertainment wise) , but its better than watching the Bold and the Beautiful. They have the same king of hyperbole story lines with 0% of the wrestling.

The E knows people like me, @Kind Gentleman @Twitter @krackdagawd gonna keep watching because we respect what happened in the day and hope the E will come out of the PG era end produce more ether.


But if it doesn't, it's still better than 99% of the retardedness that one see's on television these days
the soliloquy of a mark :lolbron:

on the real tho general hospital is a million times better than wwe 2003-present :mjpls:
 

Fellatio

Pro
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
1,702
Reputation
15
Daps
942
Reppin
NULL
I've been thinking about this exact issue. I was wondering if they are at all concerned about exposing their current product as watered-down and losing adult viewers as a result.

A lot of us only watch today's product because there's no strong alternative. We sit around waiting for the rare epic moments instead of enjoying the product consistently like we did when the product was so much better.

This is why i have only just.. got started watching raw in 5 minutes
 
Top