Yoshida (Sony): I don't Understand people who only want aaa games

(ALi)

...
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
2,977
Reputation
186
Daps
3,876
Reppin
NULL
I'm not investing in a PS4 to play low budget indie games get out with that nonsense.
Give me SONY's triple A exclusives only then I'm hoping on board.
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
36,265
Reputation
8,060
Daps
100,328
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
notice the word ONLY

he never said hate all AAA games... or AAA aren't the shyt...

all he said is what i've been saying forever...


who the hell buys a system, then ONLY counts AAA exclusives as games... same argument since day 1... "yea but what exclusives you putting out" "yea but where's the games"

as if multiplats and smaller indie games aren't playable on the system.. of course you gonna put AAA above all, cause that's what AAA is about.. but that doesn't mean you suddenly start counting them as the only games that count for a system.. that is a little weird
 

Khalil's_Black_Excellence

The King of Fighters
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,842
Reputation
1,631
Daps
27,808
Reppin
Phoenix, AZ
notice the word ONLY

he never said hate all AAA games... or AAA aren't the shyt...

all he said is what i've been saying forever...


who the hell buys a system, then ONLY counts AAA exclusives as games... same argument since day 1... "yea but what exclusives you putting out" "yea but where's the games"

as if multiplats and smaller indie games aren't playable on the system.. of course you gonna put AAA above all, cause that's what AAA is about.. but that doesn't mean you suddenly start counting them as the only games that count for a system.. that is a little weird

I wouldn't even put AAA above all. It really all depends on what the games are really. Some non AAA games are every bit as fun and gameplay fulfilling (if not even moreso) than some AAA games are and some AAA games are a bust too. Not to mention that the line of AAA is a lil blurry anyway. Not every game with a AAA budget makes for a AAA caliber title.
 

Czerka

All Star
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
6,895
Reputation
-110
Daps
6,734
Reppin
NULL
I wouldn't even put AAA above all. It really all depends on what the games are really. Some non AAA games are every bit as fun and gameplay fulfilling (if not even moreso) than some AAA games are and some AAA games are a bust too. Not to mention that the line of AAA is a lil blurry anyway. Not every game with a AAA budget makes for a AAA caliber title.

thats not the point though. you can play indies on a cheap ass pc and someday probably on mobile phones too. you cant play AAA games on any of those things. and by cheap ass pc i mean dirt cheap
 

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
20,093
Reputation
4,214
Daps
48,854
A AAA game should be just that "AAA". A game thats rare, takes time and care and you can tell they really put time into it. Square used to be the kings of this in the 90's - 2000's. You knew you had about a 2 year window on the next Final Fantasy but when it dropped you KNEW it was gonna be good. and from about 1994 - 2003-ish this was gaming ethos.

The yearly x-mas/black friday crunch also killed gaming. Assassins Creed 2 is one of the best games i have ever played, but 3 was so depressing because i could tell they just needed to get it out. It wasn't rushed but you can tell they are making it up as they go instead of taking that extra 2 or 3 months for JUST story boarding and story development, the tech isnt the issue anymore. In fact, Brotherhood and Revelations prolly should have been one game.

I'm ok with a next instalment taking 2 years if i know i'm gonna get quality...just don't piss around like SquareEnix with FF XV
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
73,777
Reputation
4,259
Daps
116,814
Reppin
Tha Land
Sony:

"We have the most powerful console ever where you can play AAA games at their best":win:

":dahell: Why the hell y'all want so many AAA games? Go play mercenary kings or something"
 

Khalil's_Black_Excellence

The King of Fighters
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,842
Reputation
1,631
Daps
27,808
Reppin
Phoenix, AZ
A AAA game should be just that "AAA". A game thats rare, takes time and care and you can tell they really put time into it. Square used to be the kings of this in the 90's - 2000's. You knew you had about a 5-year window on the next Final Fantasy but when it dropped you KNEW it was gonna be good. and from about 1994 - 2003-ish this was gaming ethos.

The yearly x-mas/black friday crunch also killed gaming. Assassins Creed 2 is one of the best games i have ever played, but 3 was so depressing because i could tell they just needed to get it out. It wasn't rushed but you can tell they are making it up as they go instead of taking that extra 2 or 3 months for JUST story boarding and story development, the tech isnt the issue anymore. In fact, Brotherhood and Revelations prolly should have been one game.


I'm ok with a next instalment taking 2 years if i know i'm gonna get quality...just don't piss around like SquareEnix with FF XV

Fixed.
 

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
20,093
Reputation
4,214
Daps
48,854

thats only between the gens man,VI came out in 94, VII came out in 97, VIII came out in 99, XI came out in 2000 and X in 2001. The only reason 8 and 9 were stacked is because VII made loads of money and they could dev VIII and XI simultaneously. And the only reason there was such a large gap between XI and XII was the fact that Square had no idea how massive an MMO undertaking woulda been. Then again a gen gap between XII and XIII
 
Top