You can’t automate the consumer

Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Messages
20,447
Reputation
705
Daps
82,677
:skip:

We keep hearing the same breathless prediction: AI will replace most jobs because corporations won’t have to pay humans anymore

No wages, no breaks, no healthcare. Just pure, uninterrupted profit. Okay cool

If you automate away the entire workforce, who the fukk is left with money to buy shyt? Are CEOs planning to sell electric cars, luxury handbags, and fast food to other AI models? Maybe the chatbots will start placing bulk Amazon orders.

You can automate everything, cut costs, and boost margins all you want, but if the population can’t participate in the economy, the whole system collapses on itself. It’s not just about replacing jobs; it’s about replacing the very foundation that keeps capitalism running: consumers with income. You can’t extract infinite profit from a society you’ve made economically obsolete.

Andrew Yang laid out a basic income plan to prepare for this shift, nobody wanted it. :mjgrin:Bernie pushed for fair wages, healthcare, and worker protections, he got labeled a socialist threat. The moment anyone tried to build a cushion for the fall, the system swatted it away. Now the ground is coming fast, and we’re pretending the laws of supply and demand won’t follow us down.
 

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
79,386
Reputation
17,251
Daps
306,769
Reppin
The Truth
I agree

And on top of that, there’s no guarantee the service will work due to some sort of human error (there is always human error) or due to consumers probably not wanting AI services for EVERYTHING.

Eventually, human competition will probably still exist just for the simple fact that everything has a drawback and some consumers might not accept the drawbacks of AI services…


Speaking of drawbacks, what does anyone think those might be? (And not the supposed workforce/labor drawback either)
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
72,067
Reputation
14,440
Daps
304,574
Reppin
Toronto
:skip:

We keep hearing the same breathless prediction: AI will replace most jobs because corporations won’t have to pay humans anymore

No wages, no breaks, no healthcare. Just pure, uninterrupted profit. Okay cool

If you automate away the entire workforce, who the fukk is left with money to buy shyt? Are CEOs planning to sell electric cars, luxury handbags, and fast food to other AI models? Maybe the chatbots will start placing bulk Amazon orders.

You can automate everything, cut costs, and boost margins all you want, but if the population can’t participate in the economy, the whole system collapses on itself. It’s not just about replacing jobs; it’s about replacing the very foundation that keeps capitalism running: consumers with income. You can’t extract infinite profit from a society you’ve made economically obsolete.

Andrew Yang laid out a basic income plan to prepare for this shift, nobody wanted it. :mjgrin:Bernie pushed for fair wages, healthcare, and worker protections, he got labeled a socialist threat. The moment anyone tried to build a cushion for the fall, the system swatted it away. Now the ground is coming fast, and we’re pretending the laws of supply and demand won’t follow us down.
You have a real question but you have failed to factor how greedy these companies are. They expect consumption to be the same.
 

HabitualChiller

Enjoying a Long Night of Solace✌
Supporter
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Messages
17,086
Reputation
4,023
Daps
53,304
Reppin
Somewhere on an Xbox
If you automate away the entire workforce, who the fukk is left with money to buy shyt?
This is a very valid question, and I've never heard anyone give an answer on it. Let me ask Deepseek right quick.

Edit: OK, so it's a lot of shít that Re-ho-icans won't go for (UBI, Taxing AI/robots/their owners, lowering the cost of goods due to them [hopefully] requiring less resources to make)...

And some that might actually go through (government job guarantees [which will likely be ass])
 
Last edited:

cyndaquil

Lv 100 Bold natured
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
9,886
Reputation
3,934
Daps
36,597
Reppin
JOHTO REGION
I asked this in the other AI thread. How would this work? If consumers have no money how do the corporations make a profit?
 

TRUEST

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,388
Reputation
3,156
Daps
57,904
Reppin
NULL
They may not. But they certainly won’t give up. Don’t say never. Ever.
 

CopiousX

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
13,632
Reputation
4,592
Daps
66,567
I asked this in the other AI thread. How would this work? If consumers have no money how do the corporations make a profit?
This is a very valid question, and I've never heard anyone give an answer on it. Let me ask Deepseek right quick.

Edit: OK, so it's a lot of shít that Re-ho-icans won't go for (UBI, Taxing AI/robots/their owners, lowering the cost of goods due to them [hopefully] requiring less resources to make)...

And some that might actually go through (government job guarantees [which will likely be ass])
I tthink we may return to Rome. The primary buyers of goods back then were Rich nobles and the government itself. The general public just lived on handouts from the government as urban poor. This was due to slavery, which is a direct parallel to the utility AI brings to the wealthy corporations.

In Rome, slavery basically made the general public irrelevant in society. The biggest buyers of items ended up being other rich people with their own company of enslaved people producing wealth for themselves. So one noble would have a vineyard operated entirely by slaves. Another noble would have a quarry for marble operated entirely by slaves. If one of them wanted wine, and the other one wanted some new pillars for their mannor home, they would trade. Joe Maximus schmoe , the peasant, was completely cut out from these transactions. And the government itself would tax the rich people and do business with them.


In a modern sense, the future governments would give out cheese to the public to keep them from revolting. And gov will tax The billionaires and Icorporations while also subcontracting to them to get stuff like Amazon web services. The billionaires in turn would trade with each other, whether they want fancy cars, fancy software, or more productivity equipment for their slave labor (AI)

I suspect that most of the trade in the future will be B2B, not B2C like it is these days. I say this because different automation companies must specialize. Open AI will be specializing in automating speech, but they'll need another corporation specializing in automating construction work or automating network infrastructure in order to keep growing. Similarly a corporation that automates agriculture, would need another corporation to automate its accounting. So a lot of B2B AI transactions will occur



I suspect the challenge for the few of us still living in the free world before AI does everything, willl have the task of acquiring enough wealth to have our own automation and our own land so that we don't become one of the many peasants in New Rome living on a handouts.
 
Last edited:

African Peasant

Veteran
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
21,009
Reputation
3,522
Daps
76,546
At the end of the of the process, they won't need money coming the common folk. They will use it between themselves.

They will have the natural ressources and AI robots to transform them. And they will buy those stuffs between them. The Henry Ford model of 'you need to pay your employe so they will buy your stuff will be over'.

The masses will became useless, outside of some sick perverted use

#staywoke
 

African Peasant

Veteran
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
21,009
Reputation
3,522
Daps
76,546
I tthink we may return to Rome. The primary buyers of goods back then were Rich nobles and the government itself. The general public just lived on handouts from the government as urban poor. This was due to slavery, which is a direct parallel to the utility AI brings to the wealthy.

In Rome, slavery basically made the general public irrelevant in society. The biggest buyers of items ended up being other rich people with their own army of enslaved people producing wealth for themselves. So one noble would have a vineyard operated entirely by slaves. Another noble would have a quarry for marble operated entirely by slaves. If one of them wanted wine, and the other one wanted some new pillars for their mannor home, they would trade. Joe Maximus schmoe , the peasant, was completely cut out from these transactions. And the government itself would tax the rich people and do business with them.


In a modern sense, the future governments would give out cheese to the public to keep them from revolting. And gov will tax The billionaires, while also subcontracting to them to get stuff like Amazon web services. The billionaires in turn would trade with each other, whether they want fancy cars, fancy software, or more productivity equipment for their slave labor (AI)



I suspect the challenge for the few of us still living in the free world before AI does everything, willl have the task of acquiring enough wealth to have our own automation and our own land so that we don't become one of the many peasants in New Rome living on a handouts.
:ehh::francis:

It's over
 

ItsPeople

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
4,997
Reputation
2,128
Daps
23,865
At that point things that humans traditionally made won’t be needed and everything else would devolve into trade between the rich and the government.

It’s happening right before our eyes, just look at the hollowing out of the middle class and replacing humans with AI.

The rich aren’t even doing it for the money per se. They just want earth to be their playground and bring it back to a time where there was peasants and a noble class.

Nothing new is under the sun.
 

Windows 91

Obsolete
Supporter
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
11,328
Reputation
3,194
Daps
46,277
Reppin
C:\
People will probably just keep consuming using an increasing amount of credit and buy-now-pay-later services. We kinda see it already with the explosion of Klarna type applications. People are funding vacations and making big purchases despite being completely broke. End result going to be some kind of debt slavery where the corporation owns you in some way.
 

CopiousX

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
13,632
Reputation
4,592
Daps
66,567
People will probably just keep consuming using an increasing amount of credit and buy-now-pay-later services. We kinda see it already with the explosion of Klarna type applications. People are funding vacations and making big purchases despite being completely broke. End result going to be some kind of debt slavery where the corporation owns you in some way.
I worry that even debt slavery won't be profitable for companies. consumer loans as a concept won't even be a thing anymore outside of the Uber wealthy when the unemployment rate is 80% :pachaha:



Why on earth would the MasterCard AI department lend money to you when they know you're not going to get a job, while they can just lend it to open ai or Boston dynamic that have guaranteed contracts? I'd assume the same lending privileges would go to the top shareholders of these companies cuz they would be multimillionaires and billionaires living on interest/dividends
 
Top