You know what, I’m getting SICK of people undervaluing elite RBs.

[Colin X]

“They’re not that important when you can just get a committe” SHUT THE fukk UP.


No committee of running backs is going to take over and dominate a game like ONE Zeke, Gurley, or Bell.


No committe of mothafukkas will have the impact on the game like those 3. Not only will they not, but they couldn’t even come CLOSE


Do folks not watch Cowboys, Rams, and Steelers games? Elite RBs are 100% GAME CHANGERS.

I’m getting sick of that shyt brehs. I don’t care how much of a passing league the shyt becomes. That upper elite class of RBs will always have the highest value (to me) after a QB

 

[tremonthustler1]

“They’re not that important when you can just get a committe” SHUT THE fukk UP.


No committee of running backs is going to take over and dominate a game like ONE Zeke, Gurley, or Bell.


No committe of mothafukkas will have the impact on the game like those 3. Not only will they not, but they couldn’t even come CLOSE


Do folks not watch Cowboys, Rams, and Steelers games? Elite RBs are 100% GAME CHANGERS.

I’m getting sick of that shyt brehs. I don’t care how much of a passing league the shyt becomes. That upper elite class of RBs will always have the highest value (to me) after a QB

ok. be mad about it if you want, but name the last game changing RB that led his team to a superbowl. The narrative won't sway back to the RB til that happens again.

Lynch is as close as you'll get to that and that was led by their defense and Wilson primarily.

 

[Thegospel]

ok. be mad about it if you want, but name the last game changing RB that led his team to a superbowl. The narrative won't sway back to the RB til that happens again.

Faulk

 

[PortCityProphet]

ok. be mad about it if you want, but name the last game changing RB that led his team to a superbowl. The narrative won't sway back to the RB til that happens again.

Lynch is as close as you'll get to that and that was led by their defense and Wilson primarily.

Lynch
Mybad you must have edited your post to include him but we agree

 

[tremonthustler1]

Faulk

Marshall Faulk was a long, long time ago.

Long story short, it's tough to pay your RB and your QB at the same time unless you have a major deficiency somewhere else.

 

[Antdrewjosh]

The two most dominant WRs havent won shyt either

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Oh look, another thread that disregards reality to push their myopic take.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

The narrative

The irony in the bolded

 

[Darealtwo1]

Kareem Hunt lead the NFL in rushing last year....He was a 3rd round pick.

Jordan Howard was 2nd in Rushing 2 years ago and 6th last year......He was a 5th round pick.

Clearly these backs can be found and replaced

 

[EBK String]

the NFL purposely did that. Black rbs used to be the face of the NFL now its white QBs.

:nflmjpls:

 

[tremonthustler1]

The irony in the bolded

what's wrong with it? It's not as if it's not true. When your cap system is what it is, teams cut corners, so you start at the most expendable positions. RB happens to be one of them. if you have an elite one, yes, keep him, but that's one of those positions where you wouldn't hesitate to start a mid to late round pick and get immediate results.

 

[phillycavsfan]

Marshall Faulk was a long, long time ago.

Long story short, it's tough to pay your RB and your QB at the same time unless you have a major deficiency somewhere else.

Basically it's easier to find elite RBs than elite QBs. Also, elite QBs last longer.

 

[Kimo_bud]

a great rb is just as valuable as a great qb. the only difference is the skin color.

 

[Kimo_bud]

the NFL purposely did that. Black rbs used to be the face of the NFL now its white QBs.

:nflmjpls:

they swindled us

 

[phillycavsfan]

a great rb is just as valuable as a great qb. the only difference is the skin color.

Are you stuck in 1993? Why are you handing over the QB position to white folks? And no, elite RBs don't win titles. QBs and defenses do.