Rand Paul wasn't the accused.@ nikkas getting angry in this thread.
HL liberals hate civil discourse.
...and his identity has been leaked already. My issue was with people being able to make accusation from the shadows, to throwing stones and hiding hands, that isn't the case here.
Rand Paul wasn't the accused.
Dems didn't think Trump would win. No need to conspire.
“My question is not about a ‘whistleblower,’ as I have no independent information on his identity. My question is about the actions of known Obama partisans within the NSC and House staff and how they are reported to have conspired before impeachment proceedings had even begun,” -Rand Paul
That’s not how it works you dumb ass.. the reason the WB is fine is because the media is ignoring it and not confirming if the name is the actually whistle blower and YouTube lawyers basically telling them remove them vids or face a massive lawsuit..I go back and forth on this... on one hand it puts him in danger, but on the other hand I believe everyone should be able to face their accuser.
That said, Rand exposed him and he's fine, and Trump was acquitted....
I was wrong, I thought he accused Trump.
name calling though... seriously?
I was wrong, I thought he accused Trump.
