Discussion in 'The Coliseum' started by mozichrome, Mar 14, 2019.
RJ Barrett is one of the worse finishers i have ever seen, dude loses control of the ball and his body on 50% of his drives, dude is not a top 3 pick to me, sorry
I wonder how many of the "bu bu but Barrett is the better pro prospect" ass nikkas are still out there.
Durant averaged more points and rebounds. And if you wanna go analytical, he had a much higher win-share.
Durant's shooting percentage isnt as high because he actually shot the ball outside of 5 feet from the rim.
None of this is shade to Zion but the statement "its not even close" is hysterical.
His was spectacular too
nikka is no better than average at every single stregnth of his game, he doesnt do a single fukking thing at a elite level, NOTHING.
Texas had no chance to compete. The ppg and rpg is too close to consider, but shooting damn near 25% better from the field and being the defensive anchor of a team who can win it all is a big ass advantage my dawg
Oh okay, so it went from "Zion has better numbers" and "WTF did Durant do that no one had done before" to "well Durant put up numbers from a bummy team" and "the ppg and rpg is too close to consider." (which is now shading Durant because you make it seem like Durant was stat padding when slim is one of the greatest NBA players of all time too )
And FYI, three more points a game and three more rebounds a game are not "too close to consider."
You typing with straight hysteria at this point. Calm down.
Durant put up 28ppg as a fukking freshman.
Durant was better IMO
I never said Zion had better numbers, I said he is having the GOAT season, i aint move goal posts, i just never set any .
nikka bout to have 10 steals too
Stop dusthead posting, breh
Zion does have much better numbers especially defensively