Womb Raider
5* Gooneral
do you know how long 20 years is breh.... manning just did 18 years... so add 2 onto that and tell me luck is the best of all those qbs.. nah you sound dumb
they overhyped him like they do everybody who seems above avg in college... he's a good qb... maybe one day he'll get to great
but he is not great now... and he definitely isn't the best prospect in 20 years considering brees, manning, fukking cam newton, and a million other qbs came out better
is a prospect great cause he looks good in college? you know how many people look good in college? a prospect is great when he lives up to or exceeds expectations
He's the best "prospect" meaning he was the best coming out of college....the only one out of anyone you mentioned that was better coming out of college was Peyton, and even that is arguable.
Nobody said he was great now, just because you like to exaggerate shyt like these rest of these dumbasses on this board doesn't make it true.
Do you know how to fukking read Dumbass? this thread is not about Matthew Stafford being any good, Its about Andrew Luck Being a Glorified version of that Bum Matthew Stafford.
Of course I do, dikkhead. Matthew Stafford aint that good and Andrew Luck isn't a glorified version of him either. The only reason comparisons are able to made is because Stafford had a HOF WR who could catch anything that bum threw up. CJ aint there anymore, so any further comparison will be fukking dumb.
Get your reading level and football IQ up before you respond to me, bytch nikka.


but your point is my point... he's a GOOD qb, overhyped and not much better than the other GOOD qbs

