Why do cacs refuse to defend white women who get involved with black?
Why do Arabs refuse to defend Arab women that get involved with black men?
Why do Asians refuse to defend Asian women that get involved with black men?
The answer to these questions are all the same, and the question to this question is the same as the answer to those questions.
To further address your argument, there's no argument black men should defend bed wenches. There is, however, an argument that black men should denigrate, revile and exile bed wenches. If one wants to discourage a social behavior, the answer is to attach a negative consequence to it. This acts as a deterrent. For example, when a person is caught stealing, they are either fined or incarcerated by the legal system. The fact this punishment exists and is meted out acts as a deterrent against theft. So people steal less than they other wise. Similarly, nikkas should attach consequences to anti-blackness and cac supermacy as we see it, just as cacs and Arabs do with their women in order to discourage the behaviour. Since as long as time can demonstrate, Cacs and Arab have piled on their own bed wenches with revulsion, insult and exile for feting with black men. do you think they do this coincidentally? It's a rational response. They see the behaviour the same way nikkas do and so they attach strong disincentives to . This acts as a very strong deterrent. After all, women are social creatures and crave acceptance.
So in fact the right answer is to do the opposite of what you suggest and pile on bed wenches for their anti-black c00nery. Doing anything else--especially defending them--merely rewards their behavior, which obviously does not make any sense.