RIGHT!!!!
I never said anything about Cory being a "progressive", and nobody said jack shyt about charter schools, cuz.
Thread and article in the OP is about Cory Booker being dishonest about his reasoning for voting against this amendment, my question is:
Where is the political expediency in a United States Senator voting for legislation that would directly undermine one of the largest employers and biggest industries in the state he represents?
You might not have expected shyt from Cory, but obviously someone did, hence the article and the thread.
Considering how terrified Dems are of the fascistic regime of racist xenophobic misogynistic fascists invading the White House tomorrow, why, out of 13 motherfukkers that voted against this legislation, is one of only 3 sitting Black US Senators being cannibalized by progressives?
Why is the nikka expected to do something as fukking dumb as kneecap one of the biggest industries in his state to pass some sort of litmus test for the fringe of his political party?
With a Senatorial minority, why are Dems not combinating and consolidating what little power they have left? Do Dems consider Cory expendable, and if so, why?
Considering how the fascistic Aryan Brotherhood is now controlling all 3 branches of govt, the Senator from New Jersey's stirring speech at the DNC as well as his courageously unprecedented testimony against hybrid Adolf Hitler/George Wallace clone Jeff Sessions, should not Cory Booker be enough of a shining example of how America is stronger together to at least prevent these types of articles?
And for fukks sake...I don't even LIKE Booker like that. He seems like a photo-op opportunist, but I'll be damned if he isn't doing his best to represent the interests of minorities AND his community like a good senator should.
Economically allowing Canada to just shyt on the USA instead of fixing healthcare is incredibly short-sighted.