Cacademics support reparations...for #uglygang

[Let A Fro Be A Fro]

Diana Fleischman, the signal boosting bytch, is a lecturer/teacher of "evolutionary psychology" at University of Portsmouth. The entire field of evolutionary psychology at this point is basically just a bunch of cacs masturbating to The Bell Curve.

I looked up the bytch presenting the lecture as well, Francesca Minera. This shyt is wild...

Francesca Minerva is a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences at the University of Ghent in Belgium. Her research focuses on applied philosophy, including lookism, conscientious objection, abortion, academic freedom, and cryonics. She is the author of The Ethics of Cryonics: Is It Moral to be Immortal? (2018), over thirty academic papers, and two lectures for The Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics. Now, she is co-founding The Journal of Controversial Ideas, an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal which promotes academic freedom, alongside renowned philosophers Peter Singer and Jeff McMahan. The idea originated after Ms. Minerva published “After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?” in the Journal of Medical Ethics, experiencing death threats and obstacles to employment soon thereafter.

An Interview with Francesca Minerva, Co-Founder of The Journal of Controversial Ideas

I thought I had read that incorrectly the first time. I looked up the paper and the abstract is as follows.

Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus' health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.

After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?

Judging by some of her retweets, that journal is going to be filled with entries as well as similar troll bullshyt.

 

[Worthless Loser]

Finally someone out there trying to address the personal and professional hardships we go through.

 

[CouldntBeMeTho]

Uglygang with a w?!


Oh wait... Sorry this is another L

 

[UpAndComing]

#Handsomegang don't have these problems


I admit I went through life a little easier because I'm handsome and intelligent

 

[Thurgood Thurston III]

That just means I'm getting TWO checks

 

[VegasCAC]

"Evolutionary Psychology" should scare people shytless. These people are laying the foundation for a new scientific racism.

 

[Mandarin Duck]

As a proud member of ugly gang this is stupid.

Yea you get treated differently in the work field but the ability to prove your worth is always there.

If she really wanted to help she can give me head though.

 

[Dorian Breh]

@Mr Mulsanne

 

[Nobu]

Cacs are so on code it's amazing.

When it's convenient in order to argue for ugly cac reparations, they will say they're unfairly disadvantaged like Black people are.

But if Black people complain about unfair disadvantages and want compensation, they'll say "what unfair disadvantage? stop whining and work harder"

 

[humminbird]

They say an ugly woman has to work as hard as a man. She decided to take it one step further.
How does she explain all the ugly people who are execs. What about the lady who was President of HP and tried to run for President?

 

[Cel 510 kid ados forever]

Decent looking gang

Pull more women than all other gangs

 

[goatmane]

I said this shyt 2 years ago and I was negged and laughed at for wanting "welfare p*ssy"

https://www.thecoli.com/threads/sho...official-disability-by-the-government.619875/

 

[richaveli83]

As the Chief Executive Officer of #uglygang I don't trust this.

 

[Serious]

"Evolutionary Psychology" should scare people shytless. These people are laying the foundation for a new scientific racism.

The new scientific racism is analytics breh....

Basically you throw some histograms charts and cool looking graphs out there and no one questions shyt or bats an eye regarding the methodology or subjectivity / integrity of the "raw data" and the significant findings.

 

[Unknown Poster]

"Evolutionary Psychology" should scare people shytless. These people are laying the foundation for a new scientific racism.

This.