PoppyCorn710
Banned
More blind hatred of the wealthy.
He is actually trying to pay them for land on his property. Like restitution. The suit is to find out who the families are and give money to them or surviving relatives. They are going to get a lot of money as the value of the land has increased. And I am sure they will appreciate it since Hawaii is one of the poorest states in the US despite making billions from tourism.
The social justice Hawaiians are using these suits as an opportunity to whine to media about "colonization" and "theft" and "building walls." Zuckerberg purchased the land for tens of millions of dollars. He is overpaying by filing the suits and then paying families who come forward. Most have no idea their families were once owners. The area hasn't been inhabited for many years.
This is just another example of people rushing to judgment without facts. He isn't forcing anyone off "their land" or trying to screw people over. He is trying to respect the culture. Hawaiians believe that land always remains in the hands of the "original" family even if they sell. This connects people to their home. He doesn't have to do this at all. Going through the legal system will make it more likely for people to actually receive the money.
As far as him putting up a wall around his property, it's a popular hiking area. People could literally hike to his front door if they wanted to. It would make sense for him to secure his land with a wall. Who in their right mind wouldn't?
He is actually trying to pay them for land on his property. Like restitution. The suit is to find out who the families are and give money to them or surviving relatives. They are going to get a lot of money as the value of the land has increased. And I am sure they will appreciate it since Hawaii is one of the poorest states in the US despite making billions from tourism.
The social justice Hawaiians are using these suits as an opportunity to whine to media about "colonization" and "theft" and "building walls." Zuckerberg purchased the land for tens of millions of dollars. He is overpaying by filing the suits and then paying families who come forward. Most have no idea their families were once owners. The area hasn't been inhabited for many years.
This is just another example of people rushing to judgment without facts. He isn't forcing anyone off "their land" or trying to screw people over. He is trying to respect the culture. Hawaiians believe that land always remains in the hands of the "original" family even if they sell. This connects people to their home. He doesn't have to do this at all. Going through the legal system will make it more likely for people to actually receive the money.
As far as him putting up a wall around his property, it's a popular hiking area. People could literally hike to his front door if they wanted to. It would make sense for him to secure his land with a wall. Who in their right mind wouldn't?