Canada is an Expansionist, Lebensraum-esque, Neocolonial state, and must be stopped at any cost

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
94,574
Reputation
3,937
Daps
168,342
Reppin
Brooklyn
  • Jan. 10, 2016, 10:30 AM
  • 179,207
  • 12
Follow Business Insider:
hans-island.png
Creative CommonsHans Island.


Far in the Arctic North lies the barren and desolate Hans Island.

The uninhabited half-square-mile island, possessing no apparent natural resources, is a bizarre sliver of territory for two countries to fight over.

However, since the early 1930s, this nondescript rock has been at the center of an ongoing disagreement between Canada and Denmark.

According to World Atlas, Hans Island is located in the middle of the 22-mile wide Nares Strait, which separates Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark, from Canada. Due to international law, all countries have the right to claim territory within 12 miles of their shore.

As such, Hans Island is technically located in both Danish and Canadian waters. World Atlas notes that the island was decided to be Danish territory by the Permanent Court of International Justice of the League of Nations in 1933.

However, as the League of Nations fell apart in the 1930s and was then replaced by the United Nations, the ruling on the status of Hans Island carries little to no weight.

The issue of Hans Island then loss traction in popular consciousness and the concerns of the Canadian and Danish governments throughout World War II and the heights of the Cold War, only to reemerge in 1984.

On that year, Denmark's minister of Greenland affairs visited the island and planted a Danish flag. At the base of the flag, he left a note saying, "Welcome to the Danish island," along with a bottle of brandy, CBC reports.

And since then, the two countries have waged a not-quite-serious "whiskey war" over Hans Island.

screen_shot_2016-01-08_at_12_04_23_pm.jpg
Google



Although the two countries have continued to disagree over the territorial status of the island, the governments have managed to continue the "whiskey war" and keep a good sense of humor over the incident.

Peter Takso Jensen, the Danish Ambassador to the US, has said that "when Danish military go there, they leave a bottle of schnapps. And when [Canadian] military forces come there, they leave a bottle of Canadian Club and a sign saying, 'Welcome to Canada.'"

Currently, a plan is in the works that could turn Hans Island into a shared territory that would be jointly managed by the Canadian and Danish municipalities bordering it.

2 countries have been fighting over an uninhabited island by leaving each other bottles of alcohol for over 3 decades



Absolutely sickening that Canada would bully Denmark an ally and fellow OTAN member in this manner.

I pray to see the Canada receives their comeuppance for being an imperialist, expansionist, apartheid state.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
94,574
Reputation
3,937
Daps
168,342
Reppin
Brooklyn
Free Hans Island from the Canadian oppression
Welcome to the official website for the free Hans Island movement. Here you will find unbiased information about the territorial conflict between Denmark and Canada over Hans Island. Be sure to check our website from time to time, to get the latest information about the conflict.

Latest development: During the summer of 2010, a peaceful delegation of Danish citizens visited Hans Island. During their stay, the delegation build a small monument, using local rocks. The Canadian government, despite their territorial claims, failed to offer any emergency services to the group. In doing so, the lives of the participants was put in severe jeopardy, and only good fortune prevented any serious accidents.

Introduction
For many years now, the Canadian military has systematically invaded the Danish territory of Hans Island. In doing so, Canada have demonstrated a total disregard for international treaties. Despite repeated pleas for peace, Canada has not shown any remorse on the matter. Because of this, we demand that Canada is excluded from NATO, and apologize to the people of Denmark for their repeated offences.

The Canadian so-called free press, no doubt being manipulated by its government's lies, are playing down the repeated violations by the Canadian military, claiming that Hans Island is not important. Nothing could be further from the truth. Aside from the important wildlife on and around Hans Island, Hans Island plays an important part in the regional ownership of oil and gas reserves. Canada is therefore using Hans Island as an excuse for violating Denmark's legitimate claims for the natural resources in the area. This eagerness of Canada's part is no doubt due to a strong desire to explore the underground for resources, potentially contaminating a vast area of beautiful nature. Because Denmark is self-supplying with oil and natural gas, it is not necessary to sacrifice the precious tranquility of Hans Island for meager profit.

In the past, the area of present-day Canada has used as a platform for attacks by other countries; amongst others the United States, which resulted in the destruction of both historical landmarks and great works of art in the burning of Washington DC. Although the invading forces were forced back eventually, Canada's government has never given any official apology. This is the kind of irresponsible behaviour the Canadian gouvernment represents. If Canada's government is not shy of supporting attacks on superpowers such as the United States, what will prevent them from doing the same against the unarmed Hans Island?

Facts about the Canadian occupation of Hans Island
  • No humans have lived on Hans Island since Canada first occupied it.
  • The landscape of Hans Island has been barren, to say the least, since Canada first occupied it.
  • Canadian military and state officials have frequently violated the Danish sovereignity at Hans Island.
  • The Danish navy has suffered no casualties in the struggle for Hans Island. Canadian losses are unknown, but are at least equal, possibly higher.
  • Canada has not yet used nuclear weapons against Denmark. Denmark has no nuclear capacity
  • Since the first Canadian occupation, large quantities of Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO)has been observed on and around Hans Island.
  • Despite claiming ownership, Canada provides no medical or social services to any of the inhabitants of Hans Island.
  • Canada has never had the right to Hans Island given to them by any international tribunal.
  • The Canadian government has not denied the allegations that they plan to use Hans Island as a storage site for nuclear waste.
United we stand!
If you wish to support the fight against Imperialist Canada, please link to this website, using either of the following banners:

  • hansisland-banneri.png
  • hansisland-bannerii.png

Free Hans Island

:ehh:
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
94,574
Reputation
3,937
Daps
168,342
Reppin
Brooklyn
This begs the question is Canada any 'better' than Russia?

COPENHAGEN — Russia's ambassador to Denmark said Saturday that the NATO country's navy could be targeted by nuclear missiles if it joins the Western alliance's anti-missile shield.

The threat made by Ambassador Mikhail Vanin in an opinion piece he wrote for the Danish daily Jyllands-Posten sparked an angry reaction and came amid an increasingly Cold War-style standoff between Moscow and the West.

"I do not think that the Danes fully understand the consequences of what happens if Denmark joins the US-led missile defense," Ambassador Mikhail Vanin wrote in the daily.

"If this happens Danish warships become targets for Russian nuclear missiles."

Russia has long opposed NATO's missile shield — launched in 2010 and due to be fully operational by 2025 — in which member countries contribute radar and weaponry to protect Europe against missile attacks.

Denmark has pledged to supply one or more frigates equipped with advanced radar to track incoming missiles.

The chairwoman of the Danish parliament's foreign affairs, Mette Gjerskov told AFP that the comments were "very threatening and not necessary" as the missile shield was simply an "intruder alarm" and no danger to Russia.

"This is a way of escalating the verbal tone between Russia and NATO," she said, adding that the comments were also aimed at Russian public opinion.

"But it doesn't change the fact that we're not afraid."

Denmark's Foreign Minister Martin Lidegaard said the remarks were "unacceptable rhetoric" and "completely out of proportion."

"One should not threaten such serious things as the ambassador has done here," he told news agency Ritzau.

Tensions between Russia and the Nordic countries have risen in recent years with reports of increased Russian air force incursions in the Baltic region.

Holger K. Nielsen, defence spokesman for the Socialist People's Party, which is opposed to Denmark's involvement in the NATO shield, called the ambassador's comments "crazy".

"His opinion is based on the assumption that a war has broken out and in that case Denmark, as a member of NATO, would already be a target," he told Jyllands-Posten.

NATO's European missile defense system is headquartered in Ramstein Germany since 2012.

It includes US missile destroying warships in Spain, Patriot anti-missile systems in Turkey, ship borne radar systems carried by several member countries and planned missile interceptors in Romania.
Click to expand...​
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
94,574
Reputation
3,937
Daps
168,342
Reppin
Brooklyn
:pachaha:

Tongue-in-cheek thread, I know, but Canada is an expansionist settler state :usure:

Once a colonialist always a colonialist, that's a mindset that isn't easily shaken by a people. I'm starting to question whether Canada is a rational state actor.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
94,574
Reputation
3,937
Daps
168,342
Reppin
Brooklyn
Hans off our island!

Canada and Denmark’s ownership dispute dates back decades: nations have gone to war over less

September 30th, 2012 5:37 pm| by admin

Perhaps one of the strangest ongoing land disputes in history exists between Denmark and Canada. In the northern reaches of the Kennedy Channel at the mouth of the Arctic Ocean, there lies a relatively indistinct chunk of rock known as Hans Island. Kidney-shaped and sandwiched between Greenland and Canada’s Ellesmere Island, this remote island, which is only 1.3 sq km in size, contains no worthwhile mineral or chemical compounds. Nothing grows on it, there’s little fishing to speak of and no inhabitants of either country have ever lived there … and yet, for several decades now, these two governments have been engaged in political posturing and a tit-for-tat war of words, flags and bottles.

At a time where the climate is heating up, ice caps are rapidly melting and new shipping routes are being forged, the ownership of the Arctic Ocean is being disputed in ever increasing urgency by the five coastal claimants (US, Russia, Norway, Denmark and Canada). It would appear that the historical dispute over Hans Island can be viewed as a bizarre microcosm of the race for Arctic dominance. The irony being that although the Arctic promises new gas and oil reserves, Hans Island itself promises nothing of the sort. It is utterly barren, so why should anyone care about it? One imagines that, more than anything, the island symbolises for both countries their geo-political clout. If either country backs down now, what will happen to their international authority and/or claims elsewhere? Activists on both sides have tended towards hysteria over the matter, with Danes crying (somewhat ironically) ‘imperialist occupation’ and Canada whining about the threat to their sovereignty. On the other hand, most media on both sides regard the matter as a bit of a joke.

Canada fervently maintains that Hans Island is theirs, although their original claim, made on the grounds of their historical occupation, has been disproven. The Canadians claimed the island was named and discovered by a British man, and that it was technically theirs as they acquired all of Britain’s Arctic territories. However, that man was later proven to be an American, Charles Francis Hall, the captain of the Polaris, who both discovered and named the island after his Greenlandic guide, Hans Hendrik, on 29 August 1871. The Americans gave up their claim on Greenland in 1916 after paying the Danes $250 million for a group of Caribbean islands that are now known as the United States Virgin Islands. It was following this event that Denmark was able to extend its influence north, over the whole of Greenland. Furthermore, the Inughuits, a tiny group of Inuits from northernmost Greenland (accounting for 1 percent of Greenland’s population), had long since had their own name for the island, Tartupaluk, which in their tongue denotes its kidney bean shape.

Often in resolving an ownership dispute, a major factor is how the claimants make use of the land. While there have never been any inhabitants on the island, it’s likely that many centuries ago, as far back as the 1300s, Inuit settlers first started using Hans Island for its high vantage point during hunting expeditions. However, Greenland wasn’t entirely Danish territory until the north was annexed in 1917.

In an official capacity, Hans Island first appeared on a map as Canadian territory in 1967. That map was, unsurprisingly, Canadian. Six years later in 1973, Canada entered into territorial negotiations with the Danes to divide the ownership of their shared continental shelf. However, it was agreed that these smaller islands should carry no sea territory and that ownership should be allocated separately. Unfortunately, both sides failed to reach an official agreement on a process to achieve this and so the matter has remained unresolved ever since. A decade later in 1983, the two nations accepted shared responsibility for matters such as marine life and other environmental concerns in the area. They again failed to tackle the ownership issue of Hans Island, but both acknowledged that it was in their common interest to resolve the matter.

At that same time, a shadow was cast over this fragile diplomacy when it was revealed that certain Canadian interests had demonstrated a blatant disregard for agreed etiquette. The Canadian oil firm, Dome Petroleum from the Northwest Territories (NWT), was at that same moment employing a scientist to research on the structure of the island. Denmark was not notified and Canadian authorities claimed to have no knowledge of the activity. The oil firm was conducting structural research on the foundations of the island, investigating its time-honoured resilience against the flow of the Kennedy Channel. This was in preparation for constructing its own artificial off-shore drilling islands in the Beaufort Sea. The scientist was spotted by Kenn Harper, a prolific Arctic historian who is Greenlandic. To make matters worse, upon meeting the scientist, Harper noticed the man was wearing a hat with the words ‘HANS ISLAND N.W.T.’ emblazoned across it. The scientist had apparently spent the summer there carrying out his research.

Following this, a frenzy of flag-erecting ensued, with Denmark’s then minister of Greenlandic affairs, Tom Høyem, being the first to plant the Dannebrog on the island on 28 July 1984. From then on, various parties from both nations repeatedly removed the other’s flag and erected their own. Often, in a playful gesture, leaving their national tipple for the next round of visitors: the Danes leaving a bottle of schnapps, of course, and the Canadians a bottle of whiskey.

But in 2005, tensions took a sharp escalation towards something resembling hostility when the then Canadian defence minister landed on the island as part of a tour of military outposts. Denmark responded with indignation and sent a patrol ship, the HDMS Tulugaq, to assert Danish sovereignty. It was later recalled to ease tensions following the concession of the then prime minister, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, to open negotiations. It was decided that the matter should be resolved by the countries’ respective foreign ministers at the UN later that year. It wasn’t.

Canadian concessions then came in 2007 when new satellite evidence proved that the original 1973 division regarding the continental shelf would have in fact split Hans Island right down the middle. In 2008, scientists from Australia, Canada, Denmark and the UK gained permission from both governments to install an automated weather station on the island, and finally, in April of this year, a fresh round of ownership negotiations began. The strangeness continues.

The Copenhagen Post - Danish News in English
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
94,574
Reputation
3,937
Daps
168,342
Reppin
Brooklyn
Hans Off! Canada And Denmark's Arctic Dispute

Positioned between Canada and Greenland (Denmark), the ownership of Hans Island has proven to be a diplomatic hot button issue between the two nations.

hans-featured.jpg

Hans Island is a disputed island, with no inhabitants, located between Canada and Greenland (Denmark)
Whereas many people are familiar with famous territorial disputes, be it Taiwan, Kosovo, or Crimea, there exists one battle which has eluded popular awareness. This is largely due to the nature of the participants involved.

Canada and Denmark are known for their peaceful and democratic nature; one does not think of them as nations prone to sabre-rattling. Despite this, Canada and Denmark have been engaged in a territorial dispute for almost a century. At the centre of this dispute is a tiny outcropping known as Hans Island.

The dispute over Hans Island is very real, having soured Danish-Canadian relations for decades and remains unresolved to this day. This war of words (and whiskey) over control of a tiny portion of the vast High Arctic, remains a key point in bilateral relations. From ministerial and military visits, to international science teams, Hans Island has enjoyed a storied and coveted existence in an otherwise forgotten corner of the world.

Uncertain Past
greenland-village.

Fishing Village in Greenland near Hans Island
With Danish control over Greenland established in 1815, Denmark has long had a significant presence in the High Arctic region. Following the purchase of Alaska by the United States, and the formation of Canada in 1867, British and American interest in the region increased. Anglo-American efforts to explore and chart the region often relied on Inuit and Danish peoples in Greenland. Indeed Hans Island is named after Hans Hendirk, a Greenlandic explorer working for Anglo-American expeditions from 1853-1876.

Canadian sovereignty in the High Arctic came abruptly in 1880, when Britain transferred the British Arctic Territory (based on the claims of 16th century explorer Martin Frobisher) to Canada. This was undertaken in order to prevent American claims based on the Monroe Doctrine (no European ownership in North America) to the region. Given imperfect mapping techniques and the difficulties inherent in Arctic exploration, Hans Island was not explicitly included in this transfer.

In the 1920s, Danish explorers were finally able to accurately map Hans Island. The island is a mere 1.3sq km, uninhabited, devoid of trees and with barely any soil. It is so remote that the closest inhabited location is Alert, Nunavut, 198km to the north. Indeed, very little distinguishes Hans Island from the thousands of other barren islands in the area. Consequently, one rightly wonders what all the commotion is about.

The reason that Hans Island has become a flash-point in international relations, is that it is located in a spot where geography and international law collide. Specifically, Hans Island is located in the middle of the 35 km wide Nares Strait, which separates Nunavut from Greenland. Under international law, states have control over territorial waters which extend 12 miles (22.2km) from shore. Consequently, Hans Island falls within both the Danish and Canadian 12 mile zone, with both claiming the island as a result.

Dispute Escalates in 20th Century
hans-island-map.jpg

Hans Island is located in the middle of the Kennedy Channel Between Ellesmere Island (Canada) and Greenland (Denmark)
In the wake of the Danish mapping of the island, as well as pressure from Copenhagen; the status of Hans Island was brought to the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ), which ruled in favour of Denmark in 1933. However, given the remoteness of the island and the disintegration of the League of Nations (of which the PCIJ was the judicial organ) in the 1930s, this ruling did not resolve matters. Furthermore, following WWII both the League of Nations and PCIJ were abolished and superseded by the UN and International Court of Justice respectively. Consequently, the now eighty year old ruling of a defunct court has little power.

Following the 1930s, Hans Island faded into obscurity for several decades as both Canada and Denmark attended to more pressing concerns. Later, the island once again fell through the cracks of international law in the early 1970s. In 1972-1973, Canada and Denmark agreed on the demarcation of maritime borders in the Arctic. Both countries recognized each others' claims extending out from the continental shelf, making the agreement the largest of its kind in history. Despite the scope of the negotiations, the status Hans Island remains unresolved. The maritime border immediately north and south of the island were established, but not the island itself.

New Millennium, Same Dispute
canadian-danish-flags-hans-island.jpg

Both Danish and Canadian flags have been raised on the island in the last decade – o.canada.com
Despite languishing for several decades after 1973, the issue of Hans Island returned to international headlines with a vengeance in 2004. In that year, the official opposition in the Canadian parliament cited Hans Island as a reason for increasing defence spending. This suggestion prompted a swift reaction from Denmark, which summoned the Canadian envoy to the Danish Minister of Foreign Affairs, to explain Ottawa's statements.

Relations were further strained when, on July 13th 2005, Canadian forces landed on the island, erecting an Inukshuk and Canadian flag. The following week, Canadian Defence Minister Bill Graham landed on the island. This led Denmark to file a complaint stating that “we consider Hans Island to be part of Danish territory, and will therefore hand over a complaint about the Canadian minister's unannounced visit.”

Fortunately, despite the strong rhetoric, both sides maintain a sense of humour on the issue. As successive Danish and Canadian landings on the island erect and dismantle flag poles and markers, they leave presents for the next contingent. This 'whiskey war' was initiated in 1984, when the Danish minister for Greenland landed on the island leaving a bottle of schnapps and a sign proclaiming “Welcome to the Danish Island.”

Peter Takso Jensen, head of international law department of the Danish Foreign Ministry, noted that “when Danish military go there, they leave a bottle of schnapps. And when Canadian military forces come there, they leave a bottle of Canadian Club and a sign saying 'Welcome to Canada'”

The Common Russian Concern
nuclear_submarine.jpg

Russian submarine K-114 Tula at the naval base in the town of Gadzhiyevo, Murmansk Oblast.
Canadian-Danish cooperation in the Arctic has been increasing in recent years, despite Hans Island's continued uncertain status. On May 4th 2008, an international group of scientists erected an automated weather station on the island. In 2012, Canada and Denmark completed negotiations on oil exploration and fishing rights in the Baffin Bay region, although not for the area around Hans Island. The same year a proposal was tendered to split the island in half, but it was not adopted.

On May 27th 2014, Canadian Foreign Minister John Baird and Danish counterpart, Martin Lidegaard met to discuss the Hans Island issue, as relations improved during 2014. In recent years, both Canada and Denmark's Arctic focus has shifted away from Hans Island to Russia's increased activity in the region. Russia's Arctic presence far exceeds both Canada and Denmark, with Moscow operating many ships designed to operate in the High Arctic, including a fleet of nuclear powered icebreakers. Russia has also increased its Arctic military flights near both Canadian and Danish airspace.

Both Denmark and Canada are part of NATO, so the likelihood of violence erupting over Hans Island is negligible. What concerns both countries, is a pro-active and assertive Russia in Arctic seeking to capitalize on oil and fishing rights. This common threat, has the potential to bolster bilateral ties between Canada and Denmark, and expedite a resolution, in order to get both nations on the same page before Russian Arctic questions need answering.

Hans Off! Canada and Denmark's Arctic Dispute

But not unforeseeable evidently!
 
Last edited:

Brosef

I respect O.G. knowledge
Supporter
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
7,460
Reputation
2,770
Daps
36,839
Reppin
T-Dot
Canada doesn't give a fukk but go ahead and cook
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
94,574
Reputation
3,937
Daps
168,342
Reppin
Brooklyn
Canada doesn't give a fukk but go ahead and cook


In that year, the official opposition in the Canadian parliament cited Hans Island as a reason for increasing defence spending. This suggestion prompted a swift reaction from Denmark, which summoned the Canadian envoy to the Danish Minister of Foreign Affairs, to explain Ottawa's statements.

Your tax dollars at work, Sir.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
94,574
Reputation
3,937
Daps
168,342
Reppin
Brooklyn
You really wanna talk overblown defence budgets while being from a country that spends trillions on defence but offers third world health care to its poor?

There's nothing third world about medicaid or medicare for that matter.
 
Top