Also...
I feel like for Russia to take off from Iran, means that we gave them the go ahead. Iont think they can plot as much as we assume, I think they might just try to buddy up to us first, realizing that they don't have much of a chance of integrating fully into this world
Acknowledging an unfolding disaster in Syria’s besieged city of Aleppo, where roughly two million people are trapped, Russia conceded on Monday that daily three-hour halts in fighting that it had proposed last week were insufficient, possibly opening the door to longer pauses.
Russia also suggested that it was close to an agreement on a military collaboration with the United States to attack Islamic State fighters in the Aleppo area as part of a solution. Such a joint effort would be a new level of cooperation between the two powers in seeking a way out of the five-year-old Syria war, in which the Russians and Americans basically back opposite sides.
The developments suggested that Russia wished to avoid the appearance of responsibility for the suffering in Aleppo, the once-thriving commercial epicenter of northern Syria that has been a strategic battleground for much of the war.
A week ago, insurgents embedded in the eastern part of Aleppo broke a stalemate against Syrian military forces and their Russian allies, effectively blocking government-held western Aleppo and isolating the entire city.
Russia and the United States are close to starting joint military action against militants in Syria's Aleppo, Russian news agencies on Monday quoted Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu as saying.
Fighting for control of the divided city of some 2 million people has intensified in recent weeks and there have been some gains for rebel groups battling Syrian government forces.
Russia backs Syrian President Bashar al Assad in the five-year-old Syria conflict, while the United States wants to see Assad step down. But both are participating in talks to try to find a political solution to end the civil war.
Senior Russian and U.S. military officials have held Geneva negotiations on Aleppo and on restoring an overall ceasefire, U.N. Special Envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura said last Thursday.
What is that crap article you just quoted? A U.S.-Al-Qaeda Attack On Aleppo? Why do you guys subject yourselves to such bullshyt sources?
Russia says close to joint military action with U.S. in Aleppo: agencies
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/16/world/middleeast/syria-aleppo-russia.html?_r=0
that map breh
pet shop,dr office
Saying "moderate rebels (which btw?)" are embedded with Al-Qaeda is a far cry from US-Al-Qaeda led attack on Aleppo which your article posits. Wrt MANPADs and the CIA - I can't find anything on that outside of a WSJ article citing anonymous officials - who were fearful of some coalition partners providing MANPADs to rebels and supposedly a "plan B". Most everything else is pushback against the ideal [1]. And I'm not reading consortium news. There's a weird Pro-Assad bias which permeates their articles on Syria. The attack on HRW over Assad's gassing of his own people was enough for me.The "moderate rebels" are embedded with Al-Qaeda. Using US weapons brought in from Turkey via the CIA. They have MANPADs which restrict helicopter use by the Russians in Aleppo... and they've carved out East and Southeast Aleppo.
Gareth Porter dissects Propaganda System spin on Syria:
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/08/12/rigging-the-coverage-of-syria
very biased article fah...
Sure it is
But they're biased and providing facts and it's the other perspective
I supported the Free Syrian Army. There's no FSA. The war is done. The only avenue is a political solution with the opposition that aren't international terrorists