The Knicks would definitely be better if Draymond was on the team. Not really sure why it's hard for some NYK fans to admit this.nikka said the knicks would be better with Draymond.ain't he the same nikka that said kyle Lowry better than j kid
Draymond Green vs The World...Day 4: Kevin Love
- Thread starter CHICAGO
- Start date
so many posters on here without credibility after carmelo just won a poll over draymond on who is a better player in 2017. 
y'all better never shyt on your GMs again if you voted carmelo because you don't know a goddamn thing.
y'all better never shyt on your GMs again if you voted carmelo because you don't know a goddamn thing.
Love.
Funny how I picked Dray over Melo tho
Funny how I picked Dray over Melo tho
Texas2step
H-Town it's NOT our year
Green
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
I. I never said he'd turn any team into a top-10 caliber defense - just that the Knicks would be if he replaced Melo. Taking my statement out of context again.You just said Draymond turns any team into a top 10 defense and himself accounts for PLUS TWENTY FIVE wins in the NBA
You are in no position to judge anyone
II. I never said Draymond himself accounts for +25 wins - just that being a top-10 defense (w/Knicks) would account for 25 wins during a season. Porzingis would have a HUGE effect on this as well. It wouldn't be Draymond alone. It's the fact that the Knicks would have the best frontcourt defense in the league.
III. If we're talking about being in a position to judge - you lost that right the moment you stopped using your brain when it comes to this GS squad, back in 2015.
IV. Will you ever stop lying?
so many posters on here without credibility after carmelo just won a poll over draymond on who is a better player in 2017.
y'all better never shyt on your GMs again if you voted carmelo because you don't know a goddamn thing.
In a vacuum carmelo better, draymond cant even be a second option.
In a vacuum, you're retarded to think what scoring option someone is determines their worth.
I hope you get nothing but scorers with zero defense and playmaking in your future as that's what you consider good.
nomoreneveragain
Superstar
If they swapped teams, I think Cavs would be clear cut favorites to win the Title
G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman
Logic Is Absent Wherever Hate Is Present
Surprise surprise....a board filled of mostly Warriors haters are saying Draymond.......nevermind 
GoddamnyamanProf
Countdown to Armageddon
The Knicks, with their current roster, are currently one of the worst defensive teams in the league.
You arbitrarily declared that simply swapping Melo for Draymond would magically turn them into a top 10 defense and add 25 wins. Clearly you believe Draymond has unprecedented impact in this regard.
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
I never said that at all. You're taking what I posted out of context. I said it would account for 25 wins - meaning from the start of the season. Not adding 25 wins from where they're currently at (.404). No where in my post to I ever mention that Draymond would add 25 wins. And again, it wouldn't just be Draymond alone, it would be because of Porzingis too. It would allow him to stick to his strengths (protecting the rim + spurts of help defense), and for Draymond to take care of the rest. It'd be the best defensive frontcourt in the league by a comfortable margin. At the very least the Knicks would have an identity that's conducive to winning, rather than whatever the fukk it is they're now.
Last edited:
In a vacuum, you're retarded to think what scoring option someone is determines their worth.
I hope you get nothing but scorers with zero defense and playmaking in your future as that's what you consider good.
Scoring is the most important aspect of basketball, melo is also a decent rebounder for his position.