Draymond Out Here Co Signing Henny Bron - "Barkley Need to stay on Mute, He ain't got no Rings"

[qnsfinest]

Really?

You'd rather have Less money and no rings? Seeing that Draymond is most likely going to hall one day, most people would rather have Draymonds career.

Well, everyone from this era is gonna make more money than barkley did or any player from that era, so money shouldn't be a topic.

Draymond might get into the hall because of rings, not because of his 10pts a career average. At best, draymond might get one or two DPOY and obviously bunch of 1st or 2nd team all defense.

But no one in there right mind is gonna say draymond is better or ranked higher than barkley, dude is a legit top 3 PF of all time

 

[Damnshow]

I still laugh at people hating on Barkley for not having rings, he lost to prime MJ in the finals That Suns teams wins 4-5 titles in this era

how come suns never made it to the finals again? you are saying he lost to prime MJ in the finals, but then he lost to rockets twice, he lost to david robinson spurs as well, what type of excuses will you make for those losses?
then you bring suns winning 4-5 titles today, you are basically saying that nba game today is at all time low level. Oh yeah you are also forgetting the fact that suns team in this era would have to play by this era's rules in case you bring this hand checking bullshyt. Just go outside, get some fresh air then come back and read the bullshyt that you wrote in this comment. Only two dynasties have won 4-5 titles in post-MJ era, which are spurs and lakers. Which are far better than barkley's suns.

 

[Damnshow]

you're talking one season. what was barkley doing outside of 93?

look at that sorry ass barkley defense 4-5 titles in todays era yall

 

[IllmaticDelta]

look at that sorry ass barkley defense 4-5 titles in todays era yall

 

[Broad Street Bully]

how come suns never made it to the finals again? you are saying he lost to prime MJ in the finals, but then he lost to rockets twice, he lost to david robinson spurs as well, what type of excuses will you make for those losses?
then you bring suns winning 4-5 titles today, you are basically saying that nba game today is at all time low level. Oh yeah you are also forgetting the fact that suns team in this era would have to play by this era's rules in case you bring this hand checking bullshyt. Just go outside, get some fresh air then come back and read the bullshyt that you wrote in this comment. Only two dynasties have won 4-5 titles in post-MJ era, which are spurs and lakers. Which are far better than barkley's suns.

 

[Ronnie Lott]

Are you gonna play dumb now?

 

[Ronnie Lott]

Compared to Barkley, Draymond is a role player bruh. Barkley top 5 at his position of ALL TIME. Its a question mark if Draymond is top 5 TODAY, and he's trying to tell Barkley he cant talk?

How many rings does Barkley have?
Draymond is a far better defender

 

[Damnshow]

quoted for truth!

chuck was great physical talent with a great nose for the ball and a motor that wouldn't stop. but he could have been better, more accomplished, and potentially a champion. his work ethic and commitment to being a student of the game was just pizz poor. this is the why mj is the goat. not only was he a great physical talent, but he was committed to x's and o's , and kept himself it top physical condition.

as an analysts, many times chuck's opinions are trash and not rooted in real analysis of the game. he's on tnt as a jester and conservative shill, not because he makes well thought out valid points based on basketball or social issues. chuck is the worst former player or coach in an analyst role by far.

I agree

basically chuck doesn't have a slick ass vocabulary to voice his opinion correctly. He makes some loud statements that make him look ignorant as hell, and some fans love it when they hear some gimmick guy talking shyt on tv.

Chuck is one of the least respectable nba superstars, everyone is shytting on him on tv, it's funny how now fans are defending this c00n now.

He even got dissed by scottie when both played for the rockets calling barkley a fatass how mike never liked his work ethic.



I never seen someone dissing guys like karl malone, KG, dirk, I never seen that, and they stayed in best possible shape in their mid 30s

 

[Foxmulder]

Dudes is writing paragraphs. All that writing and he's still a HOF and top 3 PF of all time. You got benchwarmers and scrubs who never won a title on tv but Barkley can't give his opinion? And yes he's a c00n.

 

[NoMorePie]

Draymond needs to stfu and try not to blow a 3-1 lead

 

[Chill]

thread is all types of confusion lmao

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

how come suns never made it to the finals again? you are saying he lost to prime MJ in the finals, but then he lost to rockets twice, he lost to david robinson spurs as well, what type of excuses will you make for those losses?
then you bring suns winning 4-5 titles today, you are basically saying that nba game today is at all time low level. Oh yeah you are also forgetting the fact that suns team in this era would have to play by this era's rules in case you bring this hand checking bullshyt. Just go outside, get some fresh air then come back and read the bullshyt that you wrote in this comment. Only two dynasties have won 4-5 titles in post-MJ era, which are spurs and lakers. Which are far better than barkley's suns.

That Suns team was made for this era and was one of the fathers of the style that is currently played And yes, unlike current teams, they excelled with it during the handcheck era.

Must be a casual

 

[Damnshow]

top 3 PF of all time.

Chuck is not top 3 PF of all time. He is 5th, unless we count Tim as a center, then charles would be 4th.

Tim, Karl, KG and Dirk are all better than Chuck.

All 4 guys have more career points in total than Barkley as they had a much better longevity

All of them, except karl, have won championships, while karl has two mvp's over barkley's one

So I dont see how he was better than any of those, was it because charles was "bully" and "amazing" in his prime?

 

[Damnshow]

That Suns team was made for this era and was one of the fathers of the style that is currently played And yes, unlike current teams, they excelled with it during the handcheck era.

Must be a casual

how? with two players capable of hitting threes in majerle and ainge?

their two best players charles and KJ were not a good three point shooters

would be funny watching charles defending his opponents, especially those PF's that shoot threes

 

[onelastdeath]

Well, everyone from this era is gonna make more money than barkley did or any player from that era, so money shouldn't be a topic.

Draymond might get into the hall because of rings, not because of his 10pts a career average. At best, draymond might get one or two DPOY and obviously bunch of 1st or 2nd team all defense.

But no one in there right mind is gonna say draymond is better or ranked higher than barkley, dude is a legit top 3 PF of all time

He's not a top 3 PF of all time.