(Females) If you have a height preference........

Elle Driver

Veteran
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
27,451
Reputation
13,110
Daps
100,746
Reppin
At the beginning of mean streets
HALF? or just liggins?

y'all really displaying how you all blow up the extreme minority

Ironic. Considering she's the only one who said half these nikkas. The other females in here are just saying that being color struck has a fukked up history and a common place that it comes from. Some of them even agree with you nikkas that it's ridiculous to discriminate against men for their height as well.
 

John Mayer

In your atmosphere
Joined
Nov 7, 2014
Messages
2,854
Reputation
-325
Daps
6,954
Reppin
Paradise Valley
And yet nikkas wanna act purposely obtuse. A preference means you PREFER something over another. So they know exactly what it means to say you have a preference for light skin women. :comeon:

Those little men who think height and skin preference are the same obviously are not playing with a full deck and it's a waste of time to debate them or get them
to see the error in their ways. Skin preference has a long fukked up history behind it. I do agree with the weight thing though.

I'm 5'8, I've dated men my height, a guy who was 5'6, and one who was 5'3. I like small cute things lol, except when it comes to dikk. I probably wouldn't go that short again though, unless he was super special. I stay in the 5'6 to 6'3 range. I actually stood up a guy who was 6'8. Just too damn tall for me. I do get puzzled when girls who are like 5'1 or around that height say they want a guy who is 6 feet and taller.

@LovelyDay

Height requirement is also white supremacy Hitler’s definition of genetic superiority did not stop with blonde hair and blue eyes. Hitler set requirements for male applicants be at least 6 ft. tall. Hitler regarded individuals who were 6 ft. 6 in. and taller as being the highest creed of Übermensch, the so-called “Hünenmensch”. He considered men of this stature to be the closest relatives of the original Germanic warrior tribes.
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,426
Daps
26,227
Imagine the HELL a dude would catch if he said one or all of the following in public:

I don't date women who wear weave.

I don't date dark-skinned women.

I don't date overweight women.


:ohhh:


THIS




is the problem. all the crazy wild shyt i say on here. i say in life.

i have friends who tip toe around their own girls.
all their lives men have been too bytchmade to say what's on their minds and that's why women feel entitled and are not realistic of the fact that

it's a mans world.


i mean, whats wrong with telling a fat hoe " you're too young to be fat, how can i trust you if you cant even take care of yourself"

or " your weave shouldn't look like weave... the way your doing it , I can't even give you a pass ma "

or " I don't have a skin preference, but that bytches features are not my type...... she's like fukk and dump status "


:dwillhuh: nothing wrong with any of this. imo
 

LadySimone

Banned
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
7,572
Reputation
-3,234
Daps
13,038
Let's be frank, neither she nor most of the females posting in this thread were defending this stance. The majority of female posters were attacking posters for saying "I only date light skin women" when they're the same ones who list height requirements.

It is false equivalency AT BEST to say that a man's preference for a woman of a certain skin tone is indicative of white supremacy.

There's no logical difference between a woman who only dates a guy above a certain height and a man who only dates a woman with a certain skin tone. They're both discriminating against members of the opposite sex based on immutable characteristics.

But skin tone is a racial marker. Height is not. Blue eyes are immutable characteristics but it's unique to white people thus a marker if whiteness. My kinky hair is unique to black people thus my hair is a racial marker. Height, weight, intelligence size of hands or feet do not denote any particular race but Melanin does.
 

Elle Driver

Veteran
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
27,451
Reputation
13,110
Daps
100,746
Reppin
At the beginning of mean streets
@LovelyDay

Height requirement is also white supremacy Hitler’s definition of genetic superiority did not stop with blonde hair and blue eyes. Hitler set requirements for male applicants be at least 6 ft. tall. Hitler regarded individuals who were 6 ft. 6 in. and taller as being the highest creed of Übermensch, the so-called “Hünenmensch”. He considered men of this stature to be the closest relatives of the original Germanic warrior tribes.

A better comparison would actually be slavery in the United States, a taller, fitter male slave would go for a higher price at the auctions. But we don't talk about that as much as we do about how color struck our community is. :ld:
 
Top