How long can LeBron realistically play?

Which of the following would be the least athletic?

  • 25yo Jokic

    Votes: 33 35.9%
  • 32yo Magic

    Votes: 3 3.3%
  • 38yo Duncan

    Votes: 39 42.4%
  • 45yo LeBron

    Votes: 17 18.5%

  • Total voters
    92

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
49,023
Reputation
18,948
Daps
195,095
Reppin
the ether
A friend of mine (not a LBJ stan) halfway seriously suggested that LeBron would be elected to the Hall of Fame in 2033...which would mean he had played until he was 45.

Now AD just said he wants to go to 9 more Finals with Bron (obviously hyperbole).

There's no way LeBron will play 27 seasons of basketball. But....could he?


Jokic is unathletic as fukk, never leaves his feet or runs with any speed, and is a star player. LeBron is a few inches shorter, but otherwise is there anything that Jokic can do right now that LeBron won't still be able to do 10 years from now? What would keep him from putting up 18-8-8 as a vet presence and 2nd/3rd option on a title team?

I'm thinking about 1991 Magic who basically didn't challenge shots but was still the best player on a Finals favorite....2011 Jason Kidd who was still able to do a little bit of everything at 38yo without having nearly LeBron's size....2014 Duncan who had one leg but led his team to a ring...at what age is LeBron's skill set actually going to drop below those guys?

This team if AD doesn't get injured, someone like Zach LaVine signs with them in a year, LBJ eventually takes a salary cut so more talent can keep coming in....
 

easymoneysniper

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Dec 22, 2017
Messages
790
Reputation
115
Daps
3,348
He is tall so that helps, but not tall enough to be slow and still be effective

Hopefully till 40 in some capacity. Depends on how much he wants to play - if he’s happy with reduced roles

He’s chasing the points total so I would guess he wants to play a bit more
 

King

The black man is always targeted.
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Messages
17,994
Reputation
3,962
Daps
77,259
He can do 2-3 years on the Lakers, but will get traded. I can see him pushing it to 5-6 as a starter for an average team.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
54,760
Reputation
-19,609
Daps
73,859
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
tenor.gif
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
49,023
Reputation
18,948
Daps
195,095
Reppin
the ether
yeah right, and Mike Smrek led the 1988 Lakers to a ring :mjlol:

:gucci:

Tim Duncan was obviously the leader of the 2014 Spurs, you a youngin breh?

He was literally named the best leader in the league by NBA GM's not only that year but the next year as well:

NBA.com 2014-15 GM Survey

Which player is the best leader?
1.
Tim Duncan, San Antonio -- 35.7%
2. Chris Paul, L.A. Clippers -- 28.6%
3. LeBron James, Cleveland -- 14.3%
4. Kevin Garnett, Brooklyn -- 10.7%
Also receiving votes: Stephen Curry, Golden State; Kevin Durant, Oklahoma City; Steve Nash, L.A. Lakers
Last year: Tim Duncan -- 30.0%



Duncan was also voted the #1 power forward in the NBA by the GMs in 2014. He got MVP votes in both 2014 and 2015 and made All-Star, 3rd-team All-NBA, and 2nd-team All-Defensive in 2015. Averaged 15-10-2 on 57% shooting in the NBA Finals while holding Bosh to 14-5-1, and could have put up even bigger numbers if he didn't play just 30 minutes/game due to the blowouts. (He had 21-10-3 and 18-15-1 in the two games that went the distance.) Talking like he was just some scrub is weirdo shyt.

Claim he wasn't the Spurs' leader when he was literally considered the best leader in the entire NBA. :snoop:
 
Top