So theres no inbetween? You are either for the worker or 100% a worshipper at the altar of capitalism Way to open the floor for an exchange of different viewpoints
Who the hell said that "there's no in-between"?
The way the economy is set up right now, profits are treated as the greatest moral good and people with the most capital get the most say in how everyone lives their lives. That's reality.
I would LOVE an in-between. I would LOVE an exchange of different viewpoints. But that's not how it works right now. Right now, profit is king and capital is lord.
Try suing a company because they're not treating their workers as well as they should, or because they're not great for the environment, or because their product has a negative effect on the lives of their customers, and see how far that gets you. Even if you're a shareholder, you'll go nowhere. But if you're a shareholder and you can prove the company isn't maximizing its profits? By far the easiest route to a lawsuit. Failure to maximize profits is the #1 sin of a publicly held corporation.
How much say do the workers have in how workers are treated? How much say does the public have in how workers are treated? With the declining influence of unions and the continued stripping of regulations, less every day. The people who get the say in how workers are treated are the people with the capital, first and foremost. They decide the policies and they write the laws.
We don't have to run a shareholder-based economy centered around profits. It doesn't even have to be socialist - you know what a nice in-between is? Look at Germany's stakeholder-based economy, where the welfare of the consumer and the welfare of the worker get a vote too. Are we ever even going to have that conversation?
Last edited: