New York Is About to Vote on a Constitutional Convention: Here’s Why You Should Care

Are you for or against the Constitutional Convention?

  • For it

    Votes: 5 29.4%
  • Against it

    Votes: 12 70.6%

  • Total voters
    17
  • Poll closed .

BigMoneyGrip

I'm Lamont's pops
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
75,603
Reputation
10,328
Daps
300,528
Reppin
Straight from Flatbush
I voted Dem across the board, voted for diblowjob even though I don't particularly care for him. Liz Crowley for City council in my district. Melinda Katz for boro president. Voted no on all the propositions.

Who would you rather Ed Koch? Giuliani, Bloomberg or De’blasio? This shouldn’t be hard :Mjfukkup:
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
85,358
Reputation
3,531
Daps
150,557
Reppin
Brooklyn
Prop 3 is okay to vote yes on if you haven't voted yet.

I can break it down later if anyone is interested
 

Scholar

Superstar
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
8,939
Reputation
795
Daps
24,340
Prop 3 is okay to vote yes on if you haven't voted yet.

I can break it down later if anyone is interested
Please do because from my understanding it seems like a slow path to privatizing public lands. It's literally 50% yes right now and 49% no :snoop:
 

Wargames

One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
23,169
Reputation
3,920
Daps
86,222
Reppin
New York City
Please do because from my understanding it seems like a slow path to privatizing public lands. It's literally 50% yes right now and 49% no :snoop:

That is why I voted No as well. The paragraph has bullshyt that made it sound like they would replace the land later but it would be up to the same people privatizing public land.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
85,358
Reputation
3,531
Daps
150,557
Reppin
Brooklyn
Please do because from my understanding it seems like a slow path to privatizing public lands. It's literally 50% yes right now and 49% no :snoop:

The idea is they'll use a land bank to swap land(1:1) where they need to in the ADKs and Catskills so they can do things like put up cell phone towers and power lines. A lot of times they can't because of the laws governing the parks and deed issues.


It's pretty important for the region and people downstate don't really get it.


Not a knock on you but this part of the reason some people wanted a con con.

:manny:
 

Scholar

Superstar
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
8,939
Reputation
795
Daps
24,340
The idea is they'll use a land bank to swap land(1:1) where they need to in the ADKs and Catskills so they can do things like put up cell phone towers and power lines. A lot of times they can't because of the laws governing the parks and deed issues.


It's pretty important for the region and people downstate don't really get it.


Not a knock on you but this part of the reason some people wanted a con con.

:manny:
Understand that it could certainly help develop areas upstate. However, that's public land, find another way:yeshrug:. Voted yes to prop 1 as well:smugbiden:
 
Top