NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
You learned ZERO by that article. Exactly what was the purpose of that article other than the author's contempt?I very much disagree.
You learned ZERO by that article. Exactly what was the purpose of that article other than the author's contempt?I very much disagree.
as an intelligent black man, I suppose one should have come to expect racist and malicious intents from "cacs" at the New York Times.
you know better than to spread that shyt on thecoli knowing it's gonna spread like wildfire and bring no value at all to "the coliseum". keep that shyt in TLR
Are you serious? An crap article by the most respected paper in the world about an athlete belongs in TLR?
Surprisingly, she's getting roasted on the comments section.![]()
Are you serious? An crap article by the most respected paper in the world about an athlete belongs in TLR?
You learned ZERO by that article. Exactly what was the purpose of that article other than the author's contempt?
You learned ZERO by that article. Exactly what was the purpose of that article other than the author's contempt?

Dog....even TIMES readers see through this shyt. I was shocked reading this shyt this morning....but hey....we can ONLY MAKE POSTS that bring VALUE to the coli. If not...it belongs in TLR...aint that right @heisenburrr
INCREDIBLE
Showing how vindictive these sports writers continue to be.dog you are so ass backward
exactly what was the purpose of posting this here. Is this a "cacs gonna cacs" type thread ? Cause I'm sure you've learned, literally, ZERO from that information
Typical and expected.Nothing. It was an editorial/opinion piece. I don't agree with it, but she has the platform to write what she feels, so
And the question of whether teams need to or should be reminded of his (or Hernandez's) past is pointless. The teams know all this shyt already.
I don't believe the majority of teams would even be bothered by Vick's past at this point, so it's essentially just a wasted endeavor by the author.
But if she wants to waste column inches on it, I don't really care.
Showing how vindictive these sports writers continue to be.
Like I always say about white folks like yourself....it's never about the first action....it's about policing niqqas "REACTION" as always.
you don't know shyt about me
but that's what I always say about black folks like yourself... it's never about the action. it's aways about niqqas "REACTION"
Dog....what foul action did I take? The point is, your focus is on "cacs gone cac" never on the initiator or the persons actions that caused it.
You don't get it.
It's always about policing niqqas reaction to obvious bullshyt. They're at fault for what writers like the author do.
I'm not policing no n*****. I

Says the dude keeping count on dudes saying "cacs gone cac"
fukk outta here. You played that role perfectly.
It's ALWAYS about the REACTION of niqqas, never the actions of initiator.
fukk outta here clown. You played yourself.
What you made clear that it's about niqqas reactions, not he actions of bigots.you don't get it
I made a cacs gon cac thread last week, but at least I made it clear