Killing people isn’t against the lawAre cars marketed with the specific intent of killing people ("in defense")?
Sandy Hook Victims' Relatives Win Massive Victory Against Gun Manufacturers
- Thread starter Black Panther
- Start date
Cigarette makers lied and suppressed information about the health effects of smoking. Watch some clips from those 80s hearings. If gun manufactured were claiming bullets dont hurt I’d buy that analogy.
GPBear
The Tape Crusader
Oddly, the opposite. People are suing gun manufacturers because they're product work exactly as advertised. We'll ignore the fact that elementary schools are the new battlefield and crayons are the new katana.
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
I can't spell. You can't read. I guess we cancel each other out.
GPBear
The Tape Crusader
Don’t fukking start with me
Killing people isn’t against the law
Cite laws, then defend companies making products whose sole purpose is to break those laws, brehs
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
This fukking idiot
You want to try and talk logic. There is no logic for your side.
There’s no logical reason for civilians to have access to high powered assault weapons. Other countries that have outlawed these weapons don’t have the same level of mass shootings as America. Logically, it makes no sense that we don’t ban them.
Your side is “but you’re taking away our freedoms” I don’t give a fukk. Your literal only reason is some cockamamie bullshyt “I need it for if the government turns into a tyranny and attacks its civilians” but guess what, douchebag, they’re already doing that. There’s a fukking Nazi in the White House, and rather than take Revolution to the streets, most gun nuts are on his side. 2nd amendment advocates don’t give a fukk about freedom or democracy or whether we get overrun by a dictator, they’re just closet racists afraid of minorities and they want to buy big guns to compensate for their pathetic existences.
Low quality posting.
I said nothing about this being a second amendment issue you illiterate fool. Putting views about the whether or not people should have these guns is irrelevant here. The guns we're purchased legally. The manufacturer should not be liable
You're a terrible troll.
Wargames
One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
the cac mamba
Veteran
so where was the faulty defect with these products? we're trying to help you construct sound arguments, instead of just libtard guilting your way through lifeThis guy tried to bring up cars trying to sound smart, as if people aren’t constantly suing car manufacturers for faulty defects that lead to death.
You Win Perfect
bow down
Cali, CT, NY are the worst places to be if you want to retain your constitutional rights.
Wargames
One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
You’re right they just killed people’s babies as intendEd.
Bugatti not Toyota or Honda or Subaru huh
They create false information about the need for certain guns to protect you and the ability of the guns to do so. They falsely portray semi-automatic weapons as a defensive tool when they are a strictly offensive tool with very little defensive utility.