Sharkeisha.......

[Tommy Knocks]

She said she is not c00ning n acting like they didnt cut our dikks off n shoot n burn n hang us... And rape our women and force them to have sex for BREEDING purposes only... I LOVE IT...

Don't want to turn this thread into a political one, but nobody bred slaves. No one made one slave sleep with another. Yall nikkas regurgitate everything without research god damn.

 

[mrken12]

Can someone explain why this particular fight video went viral??

All the ignorant-ass fights between black people posted on wshh......yet this shyt caught fire on its own

Is it the bytch's crazy name or something?

The checklist:

Obscenely ghetto name? Check.

Ratchet beyond comprehension? Check.

Fat and angry black woman? Check.

No problems with incriminating herself on the internet? Check.



So you know white people were

 

[Robo Squirrel]

Don't want to turn this thread into a political one, but nobody bred slaves. No one made one slave sleep with another. Yall nikkas regurgitate everything without research god damn.

They did not breed us??? Are you fukking stupid... Blacks were nothing but animals to them... Y would you not breed your STUD... Gtfoh

 

[Robo Squirrel]

Ur

Don't want to turn this thread into a political one, but nobody bred slaves. No one made one slave sleep with another. Yall nikkas regurgitate everything without research god damn.

U r an extremely naive individual...

 

[Tommy Knocks]

They did not breed us??? Are you fukking stupid... Blacks were nothing but animals to them... Y would you not breed your STUD... Gtfoh

First off, why would they have to selectively breed when all the slaves that were already chosen were physically fit? Who the fukk buys weak small slaves?

Second, there are no written accounts of forceful breeding or systematic breeding. The shyt was debunked in the 90s.

Robert Fogel and Stanley Engerman dismiss the idea of systematic slave breeding in their 1995 book Time on the Cross. They argue that there is very meager evidence for the systematic breeding of slaves for sale in the market in the Upper South during the 19th century. They distinguish systematic breeding—the interference in normal sexual patterns by masters with an aim to increase fertility or encourage desirable characteristics—from pro-natalist policies—the generalized encouragement of large families through a combination of rewards, improved living and working conditions for fertile women and their children, and other policy changes by masters. They point out that the demographic evidence is subject to a number of interpretations. The reports from witnesses are apocryphal in that they never specify any particular place in which breeding practices were alleged to have taken place. No surviving plantation records detail any such attempt.

I don't think stupid people that haven't done research should go around calling people names.

 

[mrken12]

As a white man,I find her kind of hot,

 

[MooseMouthMthafuga]

First off, why would they have to selectively breed when all the slaves that were already chosen were physically fit? Who the fukk buys weak small slaves?

Second, there are no written accounts of forceful breeding or systematic breeding. The shyt was debunked in the 90s.


I don't think stupid people that haven't done research should go around calling people names.

Believe white peoples take on what happened in slavery, brehs

 

[Tommy Knocks]

Believe white peoples take on what happened in slavery, brehs

Errr white people have been the ones saying they bred blacks like cattle for decades. Who else did you hear it from because clearly you didn't read that from any where else. You just contradicted yourself.

The shyt was debunked due to the lack of systematic proof despite slavery being very well documented. Slave masters in the south weren't secretive about their practices, yet you won't find any master diaries or documents indicating systematic selective breeding.

It makes no logical sense at all. If you could breed hundreds of slaves, why would you need to import any? Do you know how cattle works? or breeding dogs? or selective breeding in general? You don't bring in more animals if you're 'selective breeding'.

Nor do you dilute your slaves genes (rape) with your physically weaker ones. It would beat the whole purpose, I don't think you thought this through.

 

[MooseMouthMthafuga]

Errr white people have been the ones saying they bred blacks like cattle for decades. Who else did you hear it from because clearly you didn't read that from any where else. You just contradicted yourself.

The shyt was debunked due to the lack of systematic proof NO ONE can produce, despite slavery being very well documented. Slave masters in the south weren't secretive about their practices, yet you won't find any master diaries or documents indicating systematic selective breeding.

It makes no logical sense at all. If you could breed hundreds of slaves, why would you need to import any? Do you know how cattle works? or breeding dogs? or selective breeding in general? You don't bring in more animals if you're 'selective breeding'.

Rationalize what you want, breh.


I just don't trust white folks


This book touched on this subject

researched by black folks

 

[Tommy Knocks]

Rationalize what you want, breh.


I just don't trust white folks


This book touched on this subject

researched by black folks

Dog, the physical evidence is there. Most african americans have some form of european admixture, that would be the OPPOSITE of selective breeding. You don't fukk up your slave stock by raping them and diluting their blood with physically weaker ones, yet as you can see today, they did just that. You can't have both, either there was selective breeding, or careless raping. The rape part makes a lot of sense, since our DNA has changed.