Spin: For a quick verdict in thick/fat debates, I propose the Roster Test

[BlackAchilles]

Inspired by the thread in which nikkas discussed 200+ lb IG personality Tabria Majors' remarks on dating in LA... There seems to be a bit of controversy over the line between "thick" and "fat"

To better determine the line when a rough judgment is needed, I say pull up the roster of your favorite/local NFL squad Link to my Skins' roster as an example if needed: Washington Redskins 2016 Team Player Roster - ESPN

If a prospective player that ways the same as broad in question would be considered too small to cut it, she's probably not really fat


If she's above average height she weigh as much as a small return specialist or one of those cac midget slot receivers that seem to be the wave right now, all good just a lil' extra thickness
















... If she weighs enough to play in that defensive front 7 tho

@Marti where you lining up on the field big mama?

 

[全能の神]

 

[Gab]

shut yo dumb ass up

 

[iBrowse]

If a prospective player that ways the same as broad in question would be considered too small to cut it, she's probably not really fat

 

[DatNkkaCutty]

ngga!

 

[Black Barbie]

Lmbooooo. I couldn't even be a WR because of my weight. Be small brehettes

 

[Kokoro]

@Marti is bae, stop it

And weight is opinion based. If you consider 200+ fat then a 205 lb chick is fat

But if you consider 250+ lbs fat then she isnt fat

 

[FeloniousMonk]

Confuse fat with muscle, brehs..

 

[25YOUTHS!!]

If she under 6' and over 200lb she fat
fukk all that extra calculation
Most of these coli "thick" females just fat anyway

 

[Ohene]

im confused. one of the worst threads ive ever seen

 

[Mojo Jojo Morpheus]

Confuse fat with muscle, brehs..

For this and a number of other reasons your proposed "roster system" doesn't work, OP.
First of all, muscle is a far more dense tissue than fat.
Meaning pro athletes at a relatively normal size will still outweigh a woman of equal stature.

Second, what is perceived as fat is largely relative to height.
200lbs 5'6" =/= 200lbs 6'0" =/= 200lbs 6'6"

Third, and possibly most important, aside from the height to weight ratio is the actual positioning of the fat. Where fat falls on a female body decides whether she looks or . A woman with a natural hourglass figure is more likely to be considered thick than a chick with the same amount of fat all on her stomach and upper back .

 

[Hagendas]

@Reaper of Threads

 

[DarrynCobretti]

OP were you asleep in every class you've ever had that discussed human physiology homie.

Don't compare the average female to professional athletes who are grown men. The genetic makeup of men allows us to easily be 200+ pounds and still be as healthy and in many cases even physically fitter than the average man, whereas from a morphological standpoint the vast majority of the global female population can't be 200+ pounds and just as healthy/fitter than the average woman.

Case in point, athletes tend to have lower blood pressure than the general population despite more muscle mass and lower bodyfat %. So comparing men in the NBA/NFL with cardiovascular systems of trained athletes, to typical 200+ pound women in their weight range would even get laughed at any doctor's office. I rarely see women in person my height or weight range with abs too, while on the other hand I can walk in every gym in the country and see dudes my size ripped with a way lower body fat % than I even have.

Admittedly taller women get more leeway to hold weight, but at the end the day they have their limits too and isn't the same limit men in a similar height range have.

 

[MikeyC]

Inspired by the thread in which nikkas discussed 200+ lb IG personality Tabria Majors' remarks on dating in LA... There seems to be a bit of controversy over the line between "thick" and "fat"

To better determine the line when a rough judgment is needed, I say pull up the roster of your favorite/local NFL squad Link to my Skins' roster as an example if needed: Washington Redskins 2016 Team Player Roster - ESPN

If a prospective player that ways the same as broad in question would be considered too small to cut it, she's probably not really fat

If she's above average height she weigh as much as a small return specialist or one of those cac midget slot receivers that seem to be the wave right now, all good just a lil' extra thickness ... If she weighs enough to play in that defensive front 7 tho
@Marti where you lining up on the field big mama?

if a prospective player that ways the same as broad in question would be considered too small to cut it, she's probably not really fat

ways

:fathead:

 

[Mad Good Dro]

Most woman shouldn't be over 180 if we keeping it a stack, anything over that is prob fat unless she's tall as fukk 6'5+