Texas Superintendent Defends Suspending Black Student Over Locs Hairstyle in Full-Page Ad: ‘Being American Requires Conformity’

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
44,733
Reputation
7,369
Daps
135,048

Texas Superintendent Defends Suspending Black Student Over Locs Hairstyle in Full-Page Ad: ‘Being American Requires Conformity’​


Darryl George's family has filed suit claiming the hair policy violates state law

Published 01/18/24 11:58 AM ET | Updated 01/18/24 03:02 PM ET

Luke Funk


Texas Superintendent Defends Suspending Black Student Over Locs Hairstyle in Full-Page Ad: ‘Being American Requires Conformity'


Texas Superintendent Defends Suspending Black Student Over Locs Hairstyle in Full-Page Ad: ‘Being American Requires Conformity'


ATexas school district superintendent defended the continued suspension of a Black student over his locs hairstyle in a full-page newspaper ad, paid for by an education foundation.

Darryl George has been suspended repeatedly by the Barbers Hill Independent School District for his hair. The teen's family filed a federal civil rights lawsuit saying the punishment violates the CROWN Act, an acronym for “Create a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair,” which became law in Texas in September.

image


Darryl George has been pulled from school because administrators at his school say his hairstyle violates the school's dress code.KHOU-TV/Screenshot


The law is intended to prohibit race-based hair discrimination. But the school said the law does not address hair length and that is the reason for George’s suspension.

However, photos of George show him wearing his hair up in a way that does not reach below his ears.

The ad that appeared Sunday in the Houston Chronicle was written by district superintendent Greg Poole.

“Being an American requires conformity with the positive benefit of unity,” he stated, referencing strict codes at the military academies.

Read More
Black Student Suspended for Hairstyle, Transferred to Alternative Education Program in Texas
Black Teen Suspended for Hairstyle Gets Sent Home the Same Day He Returns to School
Black Family Sues Texas Officials After Son Is Suspended From School Over Hair
Black Student Suspended for Hair Style Returns to School, Is Immediately Suspended Again
Student Suspended for Hair Style Same Week as Law Banning Hair-Based Discrimination Takes Effect
Larger Texas Schools Required To Have Armed Guards on Campus This Year




vh5FipB.jpeg

“We have taken the highly unusual step of seeking a declaratory judgment in state district court to verify our interpretation,” Poole went on to write.

image


In this photo provided by Darresha George, her son Darryl George, 17, a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu, Texas, sits for a photo showing his locs, at the family's home, Sept. 10.Darresha George via AP


The family of George, a junior at Barbers Hill High School in the southeast Texas town of Mont Belvieu, filed the lawsuit against Gov. Greg Abbott and State Attorney General Ken Paxton in Texas Southern District Court, arguing that they failed to enforce the law outlawing discrimination based on hairstyles.

Pool alleged that the family's lawyer said she wants to “bankrupt” the school district and its leaders during the legal proceedings.

The district’s policy doesn’t prohibit students like George from wearing locs or braids, but it does limit hair styles for boys, banning anything “that would allow the hair to extend below the top of a t-shirt collar, below the eyebrows, or below the ear lobes when let down.”



Darryl George, a 17-year-old junior, has been kept out of school for not cutting his hair.Michael Wyke/AP Photo

Poole’s letter in the ad says the boy moved to the district from one that allows longer hair and every family has to sign an agreement to follow the district rules.

“Ultimately, this is an issue of local control and deciding who should be setting the policies, goals and expectations of our school district,” Poole wrote.

The Messenger has reached out to the Barbers Hill Education Foundation, which paid for the ad, for a comment on the advertisement.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
44,733
Reputation
7,369
Daps
135,048

Black Student’s Suspension Over Hairstyle Didn’t Violate Law, Texas Judge Rules

The trial was the latest development in a case that has prompted scrutiny of education policies and race in the United States.


A portrait shows Darryl George wearing his hair in locs, or long ropelike strands of hair, that he pins on his head in a barrel roll. He has a diamond earing in his left ear.

Darryl George, a high school student in Texas, was suspended for violating a dress code because he has locs, or long ropelike strands of hair, that he pins on his head in a barrel roll.Credit...Michael Wyke/Associated Press

By Christine Hauser and Patrick McGee

Patrick McGee reported from Anahuac, Texas.

Feb. 22, 2024Updated 4:26 p.m. ET

A Texas judge ruled on Thursday that a school district’s dress code, which it used to suspend a Black student last year for refusing to change the way he wears his hair, did not violate a state law meant to prohibit race-based discrimination against people based on their hairstyle.

The student, Darryl George, 18, has locs, or long ropelike strands of hair, that he pins on his head in a barrel roll, a protective style that his mother said reflected Black culture. Since the start of his junior year last August, he has faced a series of disciplinary actions at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu, about 30 miles east of Houston, after refusing to cut his hair. He was separated from his classmates, given disciplinary notices, placed in in-school suspension and sent to an off-campus program.

The hearing on Thursday, in the 253rd Judicial District Court in Anahuac, was in response to a lawsuit filed in September by the Barbers Hill Independent School District. The lawsuit argued that Mr. George was “in violation of the District’s dress and grooming code” because he wears his hair “in braids and twists” at a length that extends “below the top of a T-shirt collar, below the eyebrows, and/or below the earlobes when let down.”

The district asked State District Judge Chap B. Cain III to clarify whether the dress code violated a state law called the Texas CROWN Act, as the defendants, Mr. George and his mother, Darresha George, assert. The act, which took effect on Sept. 1, says a school district policy “may not discriminate against a hair texture or protective hairstyle commonly or historically associated with race.” It does not specifically mention hair length.

“The CROWN Act does not render unlawful those portions of the Barbers Hill dress and grooming restrictions limiting male students’ hair length,” Judge Cain said.


More on Texas​

  • A Legal Showdown: The Biden administration is suing Texas over a new state law that would empower state and local police officers to arrest migrants who cross from Mexico without authorization. Here’s what to know.
  • A Round of ‘Combat Golf’: In Eagle Pass, the city at the center of the dispute over immigration enforcement along the Texas border, an unusual golf course operates alongside National Guard troops, Humvees and rolls of concertina wire.
  • Keeping the Lights On: Frozen gas infrastructure was the main culprit in the disastrous power failures of 2021. After changes and despite a recent bout of brutal weather, the grid appears to be holding.
  • A Diabetes Crisis: A lethal combination of genetics, diets high in processed foods and poor access to health care is fueling a rise in diabetes-related amputations for Latino men, especially in places like San Antonio.

“I am not going to tell you that this has been an easy decision to make,” the judge said. Addressing the family, he encouraged them to “go back to the Legislature or go back to the school board because the remedy you seek can be had from either of those bodies.”

Allie Booker, a lawyer for the Georges, said she would appeal the ruling and seek an injunction to prevent the district from punishing Mr. George pending the outcome of a federal civil rights lawsuit that he and his mother filed last year against the state’s governor and attorney general.

The Georges left without commenting to reporters, more than a dozen of whom had gathered at the courthouse. State Representative Jolanda Jones said she walked them to their car.

“When I accompanied Darryl and his mom to the car, I saw a child that was crying, and he was upset and he didn’t understand,” Ms. Jones, a Democrat, said in an interview. “His mother was visibly shaking.”

Dr. Greg Poole, the superintendent of the Barbers Hill Independent School District, said in an emailed statement that the ruling “validated our position” that the dress code does not violate the state law, which “does not give students unlimited self-expression.”

The trial was the latest development in a case that has prompted scrutiny of education policies and race in the United States. At least 24 states have adopted laws that make it illegal to discriminate against students or workers because of their hairstyle.

The case involving Mr. George began soon after officials at the school objected to his locs and told Ms. George that the length of her son’s hair, even though it was pinned, violated the district’s dress code. The district subjected him to punishments, including suspension, after he refused to cut it.

Ms. George and her son filed a federal civil rights lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas in September against Texas’ governor, Greg Abbott, who signed the law, and the state’s attorney general, Ken Paxton, saying they allowed the school to violate the act.

Their lawsuit is seeking a temporary order to stop Darryl’s suspension while the case moves through the federal court system, and accuses Mr. Abbott and Mr. Paxton of “purposely or recklessly” causing Ms. George and Darryl emotional distress by not intervening.

Supporters of the family, including legislators and activists, also said the measures violated the CROWN Act.

The family’s lawsuit said that Mr. George wears locs as an “expression of cultural pride” and claims that his protections under the federal Civil Rights Act are being violated because the dress code policy disproportionately affects Black male students.

In October, Mr. George was transferred to an off-campus disciplinary program. In December, he was allowed to return to his high school but then was given another in-school suspension, this time for 13 days.

In January, Mr. Poole, the superintendent, defended the policy in an advertisement published in The Houston Chronicle, saying that districts with dress codes are safer and have higher academic performance, and that “being an American requires conformity.”

Kitty Bennett contributed research.
 

The Pledge

THE PRICE OF THE BRICK GOING UP!
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
4,471
Reputation
1,657
Daps
21,180
Been following black teachers on social media around this. They’re going in, students and teachers both.

It’s gonna get much worse
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
44,733
Reputation
7,369
Daps
135,048

Black teenager suspended over dreadlocks in Texas heads to court in CROWN Act case​

BY LEXI LONAS - 02/22/24 6:00 AM ET

A Black teenager in Texas repeatedly suspended for his dreadlocks will get his day in court Thursday in a case that advocates say has broad implications for racial hair discrimination.

Darryl George, 18, has been in in-school suspension for months after Barbers Hill High School said his hair violates policy. His family sued, saying the school’s regulations go against Texas’s newly established CROWN Act.

Allie Booker, George’s attorney, says the case ties into a larger movement “regarding discrimination of minority groups as a whole.”

The case is based on a section in the school’s handbook that contains a rule stating male students cannot have their hair past their eyebrows or earlobes. George wears his dreadlocks on the top of his head, away from his face and neck.

Victoria Kirby York, director of public policy and programs at the National Black Justice Coalition, said Texas’s “law highlights the importance of cultural hairstyles but does not take into consideration the gender expression component.” Barbers Hill High, she said, “was able to opt out of the policy” by saying it did not apply specifically to the hair length of male students.

“They’re saying that this isn’t about the African heritage, this is about the length of the hairstyle, and that the length is inappropriate. But when you ask the question, ‘Why is the length inappropriate?’ The answer is because it, and let’s be clear, the length is only inappropriate for boys,” York said.

For years there have been efforts to get a national version of the CROWN Act, which prevents racial discrimination based on hairstyles, through Congress, but they have been unsuccessful.

The White House said in 2022 it “strongly supports” CROWN Act legislation and that the president “believes that no person should be denied the ability to obtain a job, succeed in school or the workplace, secure housing, or otherwise exercise their rights based on a hair texture or hair style.”

The goal, according to the National Urban League, is to create “a more equitable and inclusive experience for Black people through the advancement of anti-hair discrimination legislation.” To that effort, the group says there has been “tremendous success elevating the public narrative around this important issue and inspiring a movement to end hair bias.”

State District Judge Chap Cain said in January that arguments in the case would be heard Feb. 22 but did not issue a temporary injunction, leaving George in suspension through much of his junior year as the case plays out.

George’s family has also filed suit against Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) and Attorney General Ken Paxton (R), accusing them of failing to enforce the CROWN Act.

“We look forward to the Texas judicial system clarifying the CROWN Act,” said Greg Poole, superintendent of the Barbers Hill school district. “Hair length of male students is only constitutionally protected for Native American students. Length of hair is not protected in the Texas CROWN nor in any of the CROWN Acts in the 24 states that have one.”

“The Texas CROWN Act protects hair texture and the wearing of braids, twists and locs. Those with agendas wish to make the CROWN Act a blanket allowance of student expression. Again, we look forward to this issue being legally resolved,” Poole added.

William Hill, a legal strategist who worked on the law in Texas, acknowledges it does not directly address the length of hair because “in certain circumstances, the length of one’s hair could be a safety hazard” in a work setting.

“They’re correct, it doesn’t address length because length really isn’t what we’re talking about. What we’re talking about those hairstyles that protect curly and coily hair,” Hill said, arguing “it seems that what the principal is trying to do is to impose his cultural aesthetic on the student body. It has nothing to do with safety. It has nothing to do with disrupting class, because George’s hair is not all over the place.”

Booker said the school previously had a rule that hair could be longer, but it had to be tied up, which students complied with.

“What these individuals were doing was being able to tie up and sew up and put up their locs just like Darryl George is doing in an effort to comply with the dress and the grooming code,” Booker said. “Once [the principal] saw that a person could still have locs and be able to tie them up,” language was changed in the handbook so hair had to be a certain length when let down.

“Well, if somebody’s hair can’t come below the eyebrow, it’s not gonna be long enough for you to braid. It’s not going to be long enough for you to loc, especially coarse, Black hair,” she said.

Booker says there has been “tremendous support” from the public over this case, and she is confident George will win in court.

“One of the things that George constantly says is, ‘I just want to be a regular kid. I just want to be a child, and they’re not letting me be a regular child. And then they’re discussing things with me that are just way above my head. They want to talk to me about constitutional rights and my role in my hair,’ and he’s like, ‘I’m just a kid,’” Booker said, adding “he’s just really frustrated.”

While the hope for advocates is this case both strengthens and clarifies the CROWN Act, some think it may not be an easy process.

As an elected official in Texas, the judge, Hill said, will face “social and political pressures” to side with the school policy, and then the “case will need to be appealed.”

“If the judge is courageous enough to follow the law, then I think it means that these challenges to the CROWN Act will become more sophisticated, because it’s not going to discontinue challenges,” he said.

TAGS CROWN ACT CROWN ACT HAIR DISCRIMINATION HAIR DISCRIMINATION
 

Fillerguy

Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
17,294
Reputation
3,865
Daps
70,896
Reppin
North Jersey

Be a corny region banging coli poster brehs

I had long cornrows and some of my teammates had longer locks while we were at mostly cac HS, back in 2005. I wrestled all up and down Jersey, had matches against racist places like West Milford (were cac and azn kids called us nigg!rs when I played football) and rich ass Del Barton. We drove by cacs in full klan outfits when driving to the Dover holiday tournament.

No one ever said shyt about our hair. And its even more brehs that wrestle in North Jersey since my time. Maybe that's why cacs are trying to keep us out.



Also lol at a rebel state preaching for conformity
 
Top