The 5 Jobs Robots Will Take Last

Jimi Swagger

I say whatever I think should be said
Supporter
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
4,365
Reputation
-1,340
Daps
6,058
Reppin
Turtle Island to DXB
Shelly Palmer, CEO of The Palmer Group


Last week, I compiled a list of the 5 jobs robots will take first. Today, let’s have a go at the 5 jobs robots will take last. For this article only, let’s define “robots” as technologies, such as machine learning algorithms running on purpose-built computer platforms, that have been trained to perform tasks that currently require humans to perform.

Understanding How Humans Work
Almost every human job requires us to perform some combination of the following four basic types of tasks:

  • Manual repetitive (predictable)
  • Manual nonrepetitive (not predictable)
  • Cognitive repetitive (predictable)
  • Cognitive nonrepetitive (not predictable)
For example, an assembly line worker performs mostly manual repetitive tasks which, depending on complexity and a cost/benefit analysis, can be automated. A CEO of a major multinational conglomerate performs mostly cognitive nonrepetitive tasks which are much harder to automate. So, the trucking and taxi industries are in for a big shakeup; c-suite corporate management, not so much.

Thinking About the Future of Work
Make no mistake: at some level, every job can (and will) be done by machine. It is not a question of if; it is just a question of when. You’re going to push back now and tell me how different humans are from machines and how long it will actually take for all of this to happen. Stop. Read Can Machines Really Learn? for a primer in machine learning. Then read AlphaGo vs. You: Not a Fair Fight to understand what is happening and why you should care about it. If you’re still not convinced, have a look at What Will You Do After White-Collar Work?. It will help put all of this in perspective.

That said, there are some jobs that will be exceptionally difficult for AI to do subjectively better than humans. This is not an arbitrary list. Each of the following jobs requires a unique combination of human intuition, reasoning, empathy and emotion, which is why it will be difficult for an AI system to train for them.

As you will see, the last jobs that robots will take share a common thread: humanity.

1. Pre-school and Elementary School Teacher
Unless we are trying to turn our children into little computers, we cannot let computers train our children. (“Singularity” people, I know what you’re going to say. The Kurzweilian future is now estimated to begin in the year 2045. There will have to be a minimum age law associated with human/machine integration.) I can imagine a robot kneeling beside a sobbing five-year-old (who just figured out that his mom packed PB&J instead of a bologna sandwich) and offering comfort and a shoulder to cry on, but the robot is unlikely to provide an emotionally satisfying outcome. We teach our children to be human. If we want them to grow up to be human, they will have to be trained by their own kind.

2. Professional Athlete
Would football be interesting if it were played by robots? Maybe. Would it be fair to put human athletes on the field of play against robots? Probably not. Using today’s regulation clubs and balls, robot golfers would consistently shoot in the high 40s to low 50s. What’s the point? As long as humans strive for athletic excellence, humans will need to play sports. What about surgically enhanced, genetically modified athletes? That’s for another article.

3. Politician
Politics and humanity are inextricably linked. The complex mix of subtlety and nuance required to become a successful politician is not in the current purview of AI. It’s a training set that would require a level of general intelligence that is far beyond the reach of near-term technology. Machines do not need politics; they “live” in a meritocracy. Humans live in anything but. As long as fairness and equality are important topics, humans will be the only ones on the political scene. Some of you will remind me that all politicians have the same goal: to get reelected. And therefore, politicians should be very easy to program. Nope. Sadly, politicians will be among the very last professionals to lose their jobs to AI. (They are also in a unique position to legislate their own job security.)

4. Judge
Judges, adjudicators, arbitrators, and people who judge baking contests or Olympic sports or any type of contests that require both objective and subjective assessments have practically robot-proof jobs. Subjective judgment requires vast general knowledge. It also requires a thorough understanding of the ramifications of your decisions and, most importantly, a precise ability to play “I know, that you know, that I know” with the parties who are directly involved, as well as the public at large. If you can make a living judging baking contests, you’ve got lifetime job security (as long as you don’t eat too many pies).

5. Mental Health Professional
Psychologists, psychiatrists, and other mental health professionals will simply be the last jobs robots can take. Sure, we could do a combination natural language understanding, automatic speech recognition system tied to a competent AI system that would make a fine suicide prevention chatbot. But there’s much more to understanding and treating mental health issues. Again, humans are better equipped to understand other humans. This is not to say that medical professionals won’t leverage AI systems to do a better job, but the ability to create a robot that could take the job of a trusted psychiatrist will be outside of our technical reach until we have functioning WestWorld-style robots. And even then, it will be a reach.

Not on the List: Artist (Dancer, Painter, Musician, Singer)
I have intentionally left artist, writ large, off this list. The artist is a good subject for another article. Suffice it to say, technology has already had a huge impact on the economics of the arts. And, as much as I would like to tell you otherwise, none of these jobs are anywhere near safe.

What’s Next
If you’re wondering where your job sits on the list of “Run for your life, the robots are coming,” you have a simple, singular mission. Learn how your job is going to be automated. Learn everything you can about what your job will evolve into and become the very best man-machine partner you can. It’s the best way to prepare yourself for the advent of AI. Lastly, don’t wait. Everyone will tell you that none of this is happening anytime soon. They are flat wrong. But even if they are right, there’s no harm in being better prepared for an inevitable future.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
48,638
Reputation
18,793
Daps
193,774
Reppin
the ether
Honestly, if we have a sea-change in the way we think about things, a lot of jobs might get reverted out of machine hands.


Truth is, the more machinery you farm with, the worse the land ends up. The more machinery you log with, the worse the forest ends up. The more technology you "streamline" the customer experience with, the worse the customer experience is. The more you rely on technology to babysit your kids, the worse your kids turn out. The more you rely on technology to cook your food, the worse your food turns out. The more the production of entertainment is automated, the worse the quality of that entertainment is. We could keep doing this for a long time.

People are going to realize, someday, that a lot of things seriously need a human touch to work out. It's just a matter of how far down we crash before that happens.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
49,973
Reputation
4,848
Daps
112,503
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
If singularity is the goal, then who the hell is going to need school or at least college, when you turn 18 or 21 you just get your "upload".
tumblr_nuoro46lac1qj1cepo1_500.gif


Of course, it's obvious the way software discriminates and censors now, the "upload" you get would depend on the company and what's "legal".

All types of anti-human/meta-human fukkerry in the works. Watch Black Mirror series on Netflix if you doubt what is being planned.

What did Elon Musk say a few days ago Elon Musk: Humans must merge with machines or become irrelevant in AI age
 

Breh13

Smh.
Supporter
Joined
Aug 5, 2015
Messages
12,836
Reputation
3,451
Daps
66,160
I'm guessing basic income doesn't look feasible currently either? :wow:

These next few decades will have epic amount of changes in human society that's for sure. :wow:
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,825
Daps
43,527
Honestly, if we have a sea-change in the way we think about things, a lot of jobs might get reverted out of machine hands.


Truth is, the more machinery you farm with, the worse the land ends up. The more machinery you log with, the worse the forest ends up. The more technology you "streamline" the customer experience with, the worse the customer experience is. The more you rely on technology to babysit your kids, the worse your kids turn out. The more you rely on technology to cook your food, the worse your food turns out. The more the production of entertainment is automated, the worse the quality of that entertainment is. We could keep doing this for a long time.

People are going to realize, someday, that a lot of things seriously need a human touch to work out. It's just a matter of how far down we crash before that happens.

You forgot to say the most important fact, the more machines you use the more you can control the populace :mjgrin:
 

Kilgore Trout

Banned
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
29,659
Reputation
-7,697
Daps
77,489
Reppin
Alabama
Honestly, if we have a sea-change in the way we think about things, a lot of jobs might get reverted out of machine hands.


Truth is, the more machinery you farm with, the worse the land ends up. The more machinery you log with, the worse the forest ends up. The more technology you "streamline" the customer experience with, the worse the customer experience is. The more you rely on technology to babysit your kids, the worse your kids turn out. The more you rely on technology to cook your food, the worse your food turns out. The more the production of entertainment is automated, the worse the quality of that entertainment is. We could keep doing this for a long time.

People are going to realize, someday, that a lot of things seriously need a human touch to work out. It's just a matter of how far down we crash before that happens.


Unforunetly with a global population that rises exponentially automation is here to stay.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
48,638
Reputation
18,793
Daps
193,774
Reppin
the ether
Unforunetly with a global population that rises exponentially automation is here to stay.

That don't make sense.

First off, the global population isn't rising exponentially. It's slowed almost everywhere, in a fairly predictable manner, such that we can expect it to slow and eventually stop everywhere if we simply work on education and health care and getting people out of poverty.

Second, overpopulation is an argument AGAINST robots, not for them. The more excess labor you have, the more sense it makes to put that labor to good use.
 
Top