VOTE for New HL Mod(s) - Voting ends October 1

Who should be next HL Mod?

  • @Behelit

    Votes: 2 2.1%
  • @wickedsm

    Votes: 39 40.6%
  • @The Black Panther

    Votes: 10 10.4%
  • @Acri1

    Votes: 6 6.3%
  • @Broke Wave

    Votes: 6 6.3%
  • @Swaggatron

    Votes: 5 5.2%
  • @Call Me James

    Votes: 17 17.7%
  • @JahFocus CS

    Votes: 6 6.3%
  • @southpawstyle

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • @SJUGrad13

    Votes: 1 1.0%
  • @DonKnock

    Votes: 3 3.1%
  • @Darth Humanist

    Votes: 1 1.0%
  • @morris

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    96
  • Poll closed .

NotaPAWG

Banned
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
22,773
Reputation
6,400
Daps
79,929
i vote @wickedsm and @JahFocus CS

both great, well informed mature posters who can engage in debate well. even tho Jah is a commie (just poking fun) when i made a thread criticizing communism and my qualms with leftists he didn't name call, engaged in civil debate and kept the thread peaceful. wickedsm is just one of the best posters on the coli, period. i've never seen her be rude to posters even when a few have tried coming at her. she is objective while also not being a fence walker and sympathizing with racists and generally scum bags. i'd be happy with either of these choices.

Napoleon does not need to be a mod. if his posting style in the russia thread or any of the religion threads, albeit i think his intention in the russia thread is to limit the trolling, he comes off like a power hungry for censorship clown. he is terrible at debate and shows lots of intolerance even if the other person is being respectful.

a mod should be objective while also not allowing trolls, racists, bigots and derailment to ruin threads in high learning. if a poster is consistently derailing a thread on a topic they go against the grain on i think they should be given a warning or banned from the thread. if they want to make a thread going against the general opinions and consensus of a thread topic, i think they should do that instead because when an alt right troll enters a thread and spews misinformation it leads to just people derailing the thread, name calling etc. it provides nothing to the thread topic.
 

Maschine_Man

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
14,526
Reputation
-5,600
Daps
16,079
What about the idea that all mods should be totally transparent, even enough to put their personal "verified" pic as their avi?

:sas1:
 

NotaPAWG

Banned
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
22,773
Reputation
6,400
Daps
79,929
Someone hit me on IG telling me to log in.

Lots of fukkery I see :ehh:

Thanks for the nominations. If I win, I'll try to help clean the place up.

you're a great poster and we'd have faith in you. you and a handful of other posters are one of the few reasons i've been lurking and posting in higher learning more often.
 

LeVraiPapi

Redemption is Coming
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
17,669
Reputation
4,159
Daps
55,889
@Call Me James or @The Black Panther also seem like solid choices if they wouldn't abuse the power.


I agree. Solid poster. Deserves to be a mod.

@Swaggatron
@JahFocus CS
@wickedsm
@Behelit
@The Black Panther

In no particular order, but these posters are fair and not notjobs.

And like @Hogan in the Wolfpac said, the issue we had was the blatant pandering to the more despicable subsets of the right, and not just that but the false equivalency of movements such as BLM and the fukking KKK.

I mean just reading that absurdity...both sides are the same...where one side is fighting for Civil Rights and the other side is literally fighting for the destruction and or minimization of non-white races. We should not have had to wait this long to get rid of a mod that subscribes to the mindset that both sides are the same or that allowing fukking corporations to have decisions on how the people of this country live their lives is a valid position.

And I get it, this is an all inclusive sports, hip hop and hip hop related site/message board. But we cannot allow Alt-Righters and Trump Trolls to roam these halls. This is a good board and we're small but we do have influence on parts of the internet, even if it's little things like memes and slang/lingo.

Let's not ruin that by allowing Alt-Righters to exist simply because people have the right to exist. No, their entire shyt by definition is based on hate and divisiveness and they should be struck down and removed from this Earth whenever possible, wherever they are found.

We can avoid an Echo Chamber and still not suffer the filth of open White Supremacists

Idiotic posters who passive aggressively dap your posts criticizing their obviously shythead positions should not be mods. Period. The man was literally the Trump version of the Coli mod. Voted in because people didn't vote or thought their vote didn't matter, and voted in by people who are blind to the obvious flaws in the candidate and his positions. The fact that dude was giddy at the thought of a Neo Nazi getting killed by an Anti-Fascist protester because the "spin" on the left would be amusing to him, and not that there would be one less Nazi piece of trash in this world, should let you know the type of man he is and the type of "black" man he is.

Posters like that shouldn't have any banners aside from one that says "shytty Poster".

Preach brother. Preach. I'm gonna say @JahFocus CS is cut from the same cloth as @DEAD7 br3h. Don't be fooled. I have watched his posting style.

He will find a reason not to ban the WS and the alt right trolls.

Someone hit me on IG telling me to log in.

Lots of fukkery I see :ehh:

Thanks for the nominations. If I win, I'll try to help clean the place up.

How ? By not calling out neo nazis? I have been watching you for a while, you were one of those Trump distractors.

One of the "I can't stand Trump but he's not that bad. What about .....?" types.

You won't be do any good in this forum
 
Top