Women Absorb And Retain DNA From Every Man They Have Sex With

[Uitomy]

Sex can really suck sheesh

 

[Kalik]

Does the amount of sex with a partner, leave more traces of dna? Just wondering why some chicks always love a nikka, even when you move on.

 

[Turk]

Allah been told y'all

 

[MajorVitaman]

This is true! And for y'all out here giving women oral sex... you all are exchanging DNA with the men who she previously had sex with.

It's finna be a wrap for thotties

















This shyt makes sense is that why wenches are so weird???

 

[newworldafro]

so what you're saying is women start to slowly morph into the man they're fukking?

Yooo....this is why people say married couples start to look like each other..... I'm just saying, some of these old wives tales have some elements of scientific truth....apparently...

It's finna be a wrap for thotties

















This shyt makes sense is that why wenches are so weird???

Oh Shiiiit!!! .....so you implying the white supremacy is getting stuck to their brain, making them want to wench even more.........this topic needs to have a documentary made about...cotdamn....

 

[Barnett114]

I'm going to be mad for awhile u p*ssy drink bleach oh and if anyone loves u tell them join u p*ssy

bytch nikka :diesel:

 

[Easy-E]

Don't tell feminists...

 

[neko_804]

so what you're saying is women start to slowly morph into the man they're fukking?

*men

 

[EARFQUAKE]

*men

 

[Capital Steez]

One of the commenters kinda shut down the sensational click-bait nature of the article a bit.

This is a great example of people purposely taking research results out of context and using it to promote an agenda. The subliminal message? Don't have (casual) sex, you don't know what DNA you are absorbing! And even insinuate it may be relayed to neurological diseases. Reality: they cite 2 different papers and combine the results to make it look scary. Paper 1, the one that found 63% micro chimerism. They did not quantified how many of their subjects have had a son. Only one person was described as never having a live child. Did not report on spontaneous or induced abortions. So if all but one the women had have children, it is expected that at least 50% may have boys. Add that to the percentage of women that may had aborted (spontaneous or not) a male fetus, 63% does not require other explanation more than pregnancy. And the study found that women with microchimerism had LOWER levels of Alzheimer's than the ones without. Second study (different set than the first): they separated the subjects according to whether they had female kids, abortions or no reported pregnancy (keep in mind that the rate of spontaneous abortion among all fertilization events is about 30-50%, most without the woman ever realizing she was pregnant). The over all rate of microchimerism on this group of women without male children was 23% , not 63% as in the previous study. And the level for women never pregnant or only daughters was 10 and 9% respectively. The only group that had a level comparable to the previous study was the women that had had an abortion, and since we would expect that 50% of the fetuses would have been male, that is not surprising. So what about the 10% in the never pregnant woman? Again, while it is impossible to say for sure, it could be explained if they had miscarriages that never knew about. None of this supports the sensational title of this article

 

[Kenny West]

This is true! And for y'all out here giving women oral sex... you all are exchanging DNA with the men who she previously had sex with.

These nikkas is simps, they don't care.

Coli nikkas love ran through whores they'll happily lick up p*ssy that been shot in by 20+ nikkas

 

[EndDomination]

There's no way the Coli is this dumb.
"YourNewsWire" is a known fake-news site.

 

[Capital Steez]

There's no way the Coli is this dumb.
"YourNewsWire" is a known fake-news site.

To Coli nikkas it's a peer reviewed scholarly article. Lol.

 

[EndDomination]

Not believing this nonsense

I'm guessing no one read the article and picked up on the high reaching capabilities of the hack writer.

This sounds like complete bullshyt.

If anything, X comes before Y, and the male chromosome is a birth defect. Men came from women and that's why women possess male DNA.

Site looks fake as hell

Nowhere in the article does it say any of the bullshyt you guys are pushing. The child won't come out looking like some dude she layed with 10 years ago. What's wrong with you guys?

this is so dumb

One of the commenters kinda shut down the sensational click-bait nature of the article a bit.

Only rationality in this whole thread.

 

[Michael's Black Son]

Heaux