decent product and support it. Anything to get rid of these Asians controlling the hair market.
You want to look like a Nubian God? Get the nudred
- Thread starter ADK
- Start date
SpacelySprockets
Veteran
Look like some new nikka shyt. i'll stick with the Afro Combover. 
Nah, we rocked it in the early 90's. Some of us at least. You just dont comb your hair days after you get a cut. just brush the sides but leave the rest of the hair alone. It will eventually get like the look of using the nudred but the nudred is better.Look like some new nikka shyt. i'll stick with the Afro Combover.
Last edited:
GetInTheTruck
Member
So none of that matters because it doesn't coincide with your agenda. How convenient.
And man we been through this already, you don't even know what that sutra I referenced is about, if you did you wouldn't be bringing up the caste system like a dumb ass.
Keep reflecting like you did already in this thread.
Im a dumbass but you claim to worship this religion and call it a sutra when its called a sutta in this case the ambattha sutta? OK. The caste system was around when the Buddha lived so what point are you trying to make.
My hair too long, its 10~14 inches. couldn't rock it even if I wanted to
GetInTheTruck
Member
What caste was the Buddha?
Why are you doing this? We were talking about the buddhas hair, then you said it was a cap, I showed how little sense it made, then you said the Buddha wore no caps and cut his hair even though that was your first post on this, now you are asking me what caste was the Buddha in?
We all know his story was he was a prince who did not like what he saw in his land, then he went to find answers only to find being in the middle was the best route no extreme. Once he got enlightened he didnt believe in the caste system. The point was the writers who wrote his story most likely had beliefs from childhood that coincided with the caste system and that is why certain things were written.
The buddha, just like jesus and mohammed never wrote their own stories, these tales were written after they died and only certain things were allowed to be written as part ofthe story by followers on councils that were appointed by the kings of the time. This reason is why you have to be careful of taking things at face value because common sense tells you if a King OK's a belief system that went against their power structure, they had to have ulterior motives for doing it. They did these things to get or maintain power. You see the caste system is still around right? I understand this which is why i see the truth in the shyt, not take what they allowed to be written as being the only story told about these people. That is even if they ever existed.
Last edited:
GetInTheTruck
Member
Why are you doing this? We were talking about the buddhas hair, then you said it was a cap, I showed how little sense it made, then you said the Buddha wore no caps and cut his hair even though that was your first post on this, now you are asking me what caste was the Buddha in?
We all know his story was he was a prince who did not like what he saw in his land, then he went to find answers only to find being in the middle was the best route no extreme. Once he got enlightened he didnt believe in the caste system. The point was the writers who wrote his story most likely had beliefs from childhood that coincided with the caste system and that is why certain things were written.
The buddha, just like jesus and mohammed never wrote their own stories, these tales were written after they died and only certain things were allowed to be written as part ofthe story by followers on councils. They did these things to get or maintain power. I understand this which is why i see the truth in the shyt, not take what they allowed to be written as being the only story told in these people. That is even if they ever existed.
Buddhism is an Indian religion that spread to other parts of asia.
The Buddha was an Indian prince.
Therefore, we can surmise that the Buddha looked like an Indian. Why is this hard to accept for you? You didn't disprove what I said, you disagreed...that's fine, but you'll need more evidence than what you've offered so far.
And I asked that because you believe the caste system is based on color or race, as you've said in other threads. So what caste was the Buddha born into?
@GetInTheTruck You are having a pissing contest with me. Any fool could see that isn't no cap but, Your eyes say it is, whatever.
The heart of the caste system is race based but the Face of it is about profession. This topic goes deep but you won't even acknowledge something that anyone can see with their own eyes, so I'm not wasting time typing about something you will just disregard as false.
Last thing about this but he was born of the warrior class. Again, this is what was allowed to be taught. If he existed he may have been from another caste or even another area. There is reason why we keep seeing his hair like that. The problem is some may not want to tell the truth or some tell it for their own so they make statues of those who look like them. Look at the pictures of Jesus which dont coincide with the story of him.
BTW, all Indians don't look exactly alike so I doubt what we think of as an Indian looks now, a lot of them in the past may not have looked like this especially if they were a lower caste. I seen Indians who look like west Africans, and some who look like a mixed latin, some who look native american, and some who look like a white person. There isn't one Indian look.
The heart of the caste system is race based but the Face of it is about profession. This topic goes deep but you won't even acknowledge something that anyone can see with their own eyes, so I'm not wasting time typing about something you will just disregard as false.
Last thing about this but he was born of the warrior class. Again, this is what was allowed to be taught. If he existed he may have been from another caste or even another area. There is reason why we keep seeing his hair like that. The problem is some may not want to tell the truth or some tell it for their own so they make statues of those who look like them. Look at the pictures of Jesus which dont coincide with the story of him.
BTW, all Indians don't look exactly alike so I doubt what we think of as an Indian looks now, a lot of them in the past may not have looked like this especially if they were a lower caste. I seen Indians who look like west Africans, and some who look like a mixed latin, some who look native american, and some who look like a white person. There isn't one Indian look.
Last edited:
@GetInTheTruck. Here is something to read since you think I'm talking bullshyt about the caste system
Genetic evidence suggests European migrants may have influenced
the origins of India's caste system
http://www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articles/05_01/Indo-European.shtml
Bamshad's team found that Y chromosomes from the Brahmin and Kshatriya closely resembled European Y chromosomes rather than Asian Y chromosomes. The Y chromosomes from the lower castes bore more similarities to the Asian Y chromosome. The mitochondrial DNA showed the same pattern.
The authors believe their results support the notion that Europeans who migrated into India between 3,000 and 8,000 years ago may have merged with or imposed their social structure on the native northern Indians and placed themselves into the highest castes.
Analysis of the paternally transmitted Y chromosome among Indians in general indicated that the Y chromosome had a more European flavor. Maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA among Indians is more Asian than European. This suggests that the Europeans who entered India were predominantly male.
Genetic evidence suggests European migrants may have influenced
the origins of India's caste system
http://www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articles/05_01/Indo-European.shtml
Bamshad's team found that Y chromosomes from the Brahmin and Kshatriya closely resembled European Y chromosomes rather than Asian Y chromosomes. The Y chromosomes from the lower castes bore more similarities to the Asian Y chromosome. The mitochondrial DNA showed the same pattern.
The authors believe their results support the notion that Europeans who migrated into India between 3,000 and 8,000 years ago may have merged with or imposed their social structure on the native northern Indians and placed themselves into the highest castes.
Analysis of the paternally transmitted Y chromosome among Indians in general indicated that the Y chromosome had a more European flavor. Maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA among Indians is more Asian than European. This suggests that the Europeans who entered India were predominantly male.
Last edited: