11 Arrested After I-95 Police Standoff With Heavily Armed Men

[IsThatBrothaMouzone?]

They are alive.

We seen UNARMED brehs killed by cops.

 

[Sankofa Alwayz]

Never a dull moment on I-95…If fukkery was an interstate highway, this is it.

 

[GreenGhxst]

Them some latinos

 

[QuintessentialMan]

Never a dull moment on I-95…If fukkery was an interstate highway, this is it.

Thats the one that goes from Miami to New york? Oh yea sounds like some major fukkery. I 10 as well.

 

[BigMoneyGrip]

Wait... did they really run out of gas??
THATS how this all sparked off??

nikkas ain’t have no money

 

[Save $ not Hoes]

That's my problem with the whole moorish sovereignty. So you aren't an US citizen and the laws don't apply to you. But does that shyt even actually work? I get there are some old laws and treaties that probably back the shyt up, but has there ever been a situation where cacs just went you're a moor, my bad keep it moving

 

[AllHolosEve]

.....Not a conspiracy theorist but the levels of incompetence displayed are too high for this not to feel staged.

1. Running out of gas on the highway
2. Living in RI but not knowing MA gun laws
3. Pulling out your weapons for no reason on the side of the road in the middle of the night to fill up all while being black

shyt is hard to believe

-This. I was reading like: Who the fukk came up with this shyt? Why they all tooled up in full gear on the side of the road? What were they scared of?

-They weren't training yet. This shyt could've been avoided if they wore regular clothes for the drive & left the guns in the car to refill. Told the cop

 

[richaveli83]

You too. I swear you and @BaggerofTea are here on some agent shyt. I dont trust you or him and think you two were sent in this thread by your handlers. shyt is really weird how yall just pop up during the same topics and have the same opinions like black people MUST be democrats or a certain way on some validation from white people shyt.

 

[R=G]

Wait... did they really run out of gas??
THATS how this all sparked off??

Gen Z..not too bright

 

[NoMoreWhiteWoman2020]

That's my problem with the whole moorish sovereignty. So you aren't an US citizen and the laws don't apply to you. But does that shyt even actually work? I get there are some old laws and treaties that probably back the shyt up, but has there ever been a situation where cacs just went you're a moor, my bad keep it moving

They would have to sit in jail and hopes that the Moroccan government petitions to have the treaty enforced for them

I believe they are acting based off this law

Moors Sundry Act of 1790 - Wikipedia



The Moors Sundry Act of 1790 was a 1790 advisory resolution passed by South Carolina House of Representatives, clarifying the status of free subjects of the Sultan of Morocco, Mohammed ben Abdallah. The resolution offered the opinion that free citizens of Morocco were not subject to laws governing blacks and slaves.


Petition from Sundry Free MoorsEdit
On January 20, 1790, a petition was presented to the South Carolina House of Representatives from a group of four individuals who were subjects of the Moroccan emperor and residents of the state. They desired that if they happened to commit any fault amenable to be brought to justice, that as subjects to a prince allied with the United States through the Moroccan–American Treaty of Friendship, they would be tried as citizens instead of under the Negro Act of 1740.

The Free Moors, Francis, Daniel, Hammond and Samuel petitioned on behalf of themselves and their wives Fatima, Flora, Sarah and Clarinda.[1] They explained how some years ago while fighting in defense of their country, they and their wives were captured and made prisoners of war by an African king. After this a certain Captain Clark had them delivered to him, promising they would be redeemed by the Moroccan ambassador residing in England, and returned to their country. Instead, he transported them to South Carolina, and sold them for slaves. Since then, "by the greatest industry," they purchased freedom from their respective masters. They requested that as free born subjects of a Prince in alliance with the U.S., that they should not be considered subject to a state law (then in force) known as the negro law. If they be found guilty of any crime or misdemeanor, they would receive a fair trial by lawful jury.[2] The matter was referred to a committee consisting of Justice John Faucheraud Grimké, General Charles Cotesworth Pinckney and Edward Rutledge.

Free Moors Petition: Committee reportEdit
Edward Rutledge reported from the committee on the petition on the same day and the House agreed to the report, which read as follows Vizt: "They have Considered the same and are of opinion that no Law of this State can in its Construction or Operation apply to them, and that persons who were Subjects of the Emperor of Morocco being Free in this State are not triable by the Law for the better Ordering and Governing of Negroes and other Slaves."[3]Because the report was not forwarded to the state Senate for concurrence, it did not have the force of law but served as an advisory opinion offering the sense of the House.[4] The report was later published in the Charleston City Gazette and the Charleston State Gazette of South Carolina

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

Meanwhile law enforcement had no concern when these armed militia fools took over the State House in Michigan.

I wonder why?

Color me surprised.

shouldn't allow either

these guys didn't have firearm licenses and open carrying

all that goofy shyt people teach each other online is a detriment in real life. "sovereign citizenship" is not a real thing but has been adopted in fake woke circles for years

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

They would have to sit in jail and hopes that the Moroccan government petitions to have the treaty enforced for them

I believe they are acting based off this law

Moors Sundry Act of 1790 - Wikipedia



The Moors Sundry Act of 1790 was a 1790 advisory resolution passed by South Carolina House of Representatives, clarifying the status of free subjects of the Sultan of Morocco, Mohammed ben Abdallah. The resolution offered the opinion that free citizens of Morocco were not subject to laws governing blacks and slaves.


Petition from Sundry Free MoorsEdit
On January 20, 1790, a petition was presented to the South Carolina House of Representatives from a group of four individuals who were subjects of the Moroccan emperor and residents of the state. They desired that if they happened to commit any fault amenable to be brought to justice, that as subjects to a prince allied with the United States through the Moroccan–American Treaty of Friendship, they would be tried as citizens instead of under the Negro Act of 1740.

The Free Moors, Francis, Daniel, Hammond and Samuel petitioned on behalf of themselves and their wives Fatima, Flora, Sarah and Clarinda.[1] They explained how some years ago while fighting in defense of their country, they and their wives were captured and made prisoners of war by an African king. After this a certain Captain Clark had them delivered to him, promising they would be redeemed by the Moroccan ambassador residing in England, and returned to their country. Instead, he transported them to South Carolina, and sold them for slaves. Since then, "by the greatest industry," they purchased freedom from their respective masters. They requested that as free born subjects of a Prince in alliance with the U.S., that they should not be considered subject to a state law (then in force) known as the negro law. If they be found guilty of any crime or misdemeanor, they would receive a fair trial by lawful jury.[2] The matter was referred to a committee consisting of Justice John Faucheraud Grimké, General Charles Cotesworth Pinckney and Edward Rutledge.

Free Moors Petition: Committee reportEdit
Edward Rutledge reported from the committee on the petition on the same day and the House agreed to the report, which read as follows Vizt: "They have Considered the same and are of opinion that no Law of this State can in its Construction or Operation apply to them, and that persons who were Subjects of the Emperor of Morocco being Free in this State are not triable by the Law for the better Ordering and Governing of Negroes and other Slaves."[3]Because the report was not forwarded to the state Senate for concurrence, it did not have the force of law but served as an advisory opinion offering the sense of the House.[4] The report was later published in the Charleston City Gazette and the Charleston State Gazette of South Carolina

A law passed to protect a monarch and his subjects somehow became confused as being an opt out clause for brothers in America

you would think whoever been pushing this shyt out there on people all these years would have read all these paragraphs.

embarrassing

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

Y'all do realize this entire 'sovereign citizen' thing was created by 'White Supremacists', right????......​

Atheism is destroying black minds.​

doesn't matter who created it THE FACT that people think they can bypass a countries laws or politics and reside on the land unaffected is shocking. that ain't reality

people need to stop with the alternative facts and bad information. Especially when most of it resides in the woke spaces.

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

the dangers of bad ideology. creates a level of delusion that separates people from reality. they really thought they had immunity. if they are not American I guess they don't have currency to buy gas neither.

Nah this is a goofy situation from top to bottom.

Niccas out strapped to the nines and then run out of gas. Can't make this up

 

[Bushmaster69]

Funny how there are so many people ready to clown these dudes, but aren't doing anything to prepare themselves for a major event.

I don't agree with their methods, and they fukked up not knowing the laws, but at least they are training. A lot of you mofos have no range time, can't grow shyt, or know how to pitch a tent.