Why do I even bother.
i) I've already stated that Kyrie thoroughly outperformed Curry in the Finals and that he had an argument (not the best, but an argument) for being the Finals MVP.
ii) This discussion is based around
@Newzz saying that Prime Zeke wouldn't get outplayed by someone like Kyrie - as if Curry isn't capable of outplaying better PGs than Kyrie - when he just had a better series than Westbrook did in the WCF. That makes it relevant to the argument.
Zeke didn't outperform every PG/main guard he played in the postseason throughout his career either.
iii) Curry and Westbrook are both better PGs than Kyrie is.
Why is this so hard for you to understand?
How do they not? I've always been upfront with my opinions on who I like/dislike and that it holds little to no weight on how I rank players/teams.