They fukked up the price on the ELR too, worst pricing on a car ever. But they really had no choice though. The highest spec'd out ATS is around 50k so with the V had to be 60it's pushing $80k though... I'm not entirely sure if it's worth it or it's Cadillac being full of themselves again (overpriced 2015+ Escalade for example)![]()
that looks like a toyota....
EDIT: The dash looks horrible and cheap .....
Dudes are misinformed. Complaining about interior pieces on a 60k performance car vs a 111,000 whipPeople are still living off of these old misconceptions without ever sitting in these cars. The ATS is not the CTS, yet come on...
Dudes are misinformed. Complaining about interior pieces on a 60k performance car vs a 111,000 whip![]()
Fact of the matter is I had a 2013 ATS for a year and a half and I got nothing but compliments especially the dash. With that being said I agree compared to the C63/M3 but the price difference makes up for that![]()
Says nikkas who are judging interiors by looking at pictures...C&D compared the ATS-V interior to the M3 and C63 and found it to be lacking. You can't put the same interior you would use in a Impala in a $60k+ car and not expect to be called out about it.
That 2015 atsv in 2017C&D recently completed their 3 car comparison with the M3, C63, and ATS-V. As expected the M3 is still the top dog due to doing everything well and the Ats-V came in 3rd due to the shytty interior build quality which comes as no surprise. Interestingly enough the ATS-V scored top scores in performance. If this car depreciates as horribly as I expect it to it may still be on my radar when I purchases my next whip.![]()