links?No LTx no care
Dont forget the M3/M4 is severely underrated. Real HP on that is closer to 500HP based on dynos
W/the V6 this doesnt give me a reason. Think how lame the old CTS-V would have been with a damn turbo V6
http://blogs.motortrend.com/1407_on...t_generation.html/bmw-m3-dyno-run-f80-vs-e90/
http://blogs.motortrend.com/1407_on...t_generation.html/bmw-m3-dyno-run-f80-vs-e90/
E9x M3 was rated for 414HP, new one is rated for 425
E92 M3 did 300 on this dyno, new one did 375 (25% more). They are supposed to be within 3% of each other
Assuming the E92 was healthy and good to go, the new one is making damn near 520 HP at the crank. New one traps higher in the quarter as well (admittedly not 25% more HP worth though)
Good informationThey cheatin
it defeats the purpose though of the ATS platform. The V8 will be in the cts v thoughThey cheatin
I am sure the ATS-V will be underrated too. I just wish they put the V8 in there instead.
The ATS/CTS platform is the next Camaro's platform. They will def be putting a V8 in those. If it had a V8 there would be a reason to get it over the M3/M4
the m3 has a turbo 6 though too right? The ATS is supposed to be a lighter my driver experience.
Yea the M3 has one too.... thats the prob IMO... if a Cadillac has everything the same as a BMW Im going for the Bimmer every time.
its priced 15 thousand less though.
This, better handling as well.
I think they got rid of that button sliding things