2017 GOP Tax Cut & Jobs Act EXTENDED via Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBA) | Signed into Law on 7/4/25!
- Thread starter Black Panther
- Start date
This is why I dont want mark Cuban apart of the democratic party
mastermind
Rest In Power Kobe
He’s a wealthy republican
Correct he just doesnt like the Overt racism, he's a 90s-00s republican
Piff Perkins
Veteran
It's still a business cycle that largely determines how people vote. When things are comfortable or good, the president is good. When things aren't comfortable or bad, the president has to go. And it's reflected in midterm voting often (but not all the time, as 2022 showed). Trump fukks up covid and loses in 2020. Biden fukks up the recovery and loses in 2024. And now Trump is in the process of fukking up everything so...I don't think it's crazy to suggest confidence in dems later this year (Virginia governor race), next year midterms, and in 2028.
Prices are still high, tariffs remain a sword of Damocles for business/consumers. Now we've got a bill that will wreck havoc on a lot of normal people - many of whom voted for him, or stayed home but were learning towards voting for him.
One thing I will say though....the Supreme Court ruling on injunctions and the fukkery republicans played around with on reconciliation tax numbers this year benefit dems more than republicans. Biden or Kamala might be president right now if there were no state-wide injunctions on his agenda lol. And a 2029 reconciliation package from a democrat president that erases these cuts and pumps money back into the economy while ignoring deficit concerns? Sign me up. Hopefully Fetterman is gone by then btw.
Ozymandeas
Veteran
I was reading the WaPo today and ACB was basically like "Yea, Trump is King and we're not gonna say he's not"
while morally righteous clowns on here are still saying Biden and Kamala were the problem. Mofos living in the Twilight Zone. These people are saying in the King's English that this man cannot be charged for anything that he does and that judges have no right to block what he does 
Justice Amy Coney Barrett said in her majority opinion that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which established the U.S. courts system, did not envision nationwide injunctions. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a furious dissent, accused the majority of creating a world where the president can break the law and no court can stop him.
“Courts must have the power to order everyone (including the Executive) to follow the law — full stop,” Jackson wrote. “To conclude otherwise is to endorse the creation of a zone of lawlessness within which the executive has the prerogative to take or leave the law as it wishes.”
In a sentence that startled some court-watchers, Barrett accepted the notion that judges may not be able to stop a president’s illegal acts. “No one disputes that the Executive has a duty to follow the law,” she wrote. “But the Judiciary does not have unbridled authority to enforce this obligation — in fact, sometimes the law prohibits the Judiciary from doing so.”
the cac mamba
Veteran
this is a bunch of bullshyt
this is like watching democrats defend trannies in sports. just don't do it
Json
Superstar
Or as reliable as you bringing up trannies in a thread about a healthcare spending billthis is a bunch of bullshyt
this is like watching democrats defend trannies in sports. just don't do it
the cac mamba
Veteran
Napoleon has never been more right about anything, than he is about that trans garbage destroying the party's imageOr as reliable as you bringing up trannies in a thread about a healthcare spending bill
ignore it at your peril
Json
Superstar
ain’t nobody talking about trannies except youNapoleon has never been more right about anything, than he is about that trans garbage destroying the party's image
ignore it at your peril
If you don’t have anything to say about work requirements or ACA credits that’s fine. We weren’t waiting with baited breath for your opinions
Json
Superstar
I mean she’s kinda right. Congress has the ability to penalize the executive or change law if the Supreme Court says the president overstepped. It doesn’t automatically mean the executive should be penalized.I was reading the WaPo today and ACB was basically like "Yea, Trump is King and we're not gonna say he's not"
The judicial branch should fairly call balls and strikes.
the cac mamba
Veteran
i get my ass up and work for 40 hours a week. it's honestly embarrassing that democrats think i should be shamed into decrying 20 hours a week of volunteering, being required, for free medicaid and SNAP
who the fukk made that the rule? is that really where we're at?i don't give a fukk about that requirement being put in place. not gonna pretend to
He's a republican agent, notice how he always try to deflect from criticizing them? He hasnt said one word about this bill, but he's im here crying about trannys and the border blaming dems for spending lol
Like beshear says in this video the point of work requirements aren’t to get people to work idiot, its to get people kicked off of healthcare coverage due to thousands of layers of red tapei get my ass up and work for 40 hours a week. it's honestly embarrassing that democrats think i should be shamed into decrying 20 hours a week of volunteering, being required, for free medicaid and SNAP
i don't give a fukk about that requirement being put in place. not gonna pretend to
